Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Sufficient Completeness Reasoning Tool for Partial Specifications

  • Conference paper
Term Rewriting and Applications (RTA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3467))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present the Maude sufficient completeness tool, which explicitly supports sufficient completeness reasoning for partial conditional specifications having sorts and subsorts and with domains of functions defined by conditional memberships. Our tool consists of two main components: (i) a sufficient completeness analyzer that generates a set of proof obligations which if discharged, ensures sufficient completeness; and (ii) Maude’s inductive theorem prover (ITP) that is used as a backend to try to automatically discharge those proof obligations.

Research supported by Grants ONR N00014-02-1-0715, NSF CCR-0234524, and Spanish MCYT Projects TIC2002-01167 and TIC2003-01000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meseguer, J.: Membership algebra as a logical framework for equational specification. In: Parisi-Presicce, F. (ed.) WADT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1376, pp. 18–61. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouhoula, A., Jouannaud, J.P., Meseguer, J.: Specification and proof in membership equational logic. Theoretical Computer Science 236, 35–132 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Meseguer, J., Roşu, G.: A total approach to partial algebraic specification. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, pp. 572–584. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Meseguer, J., Palomino, M., Martí-Oliet, N.: Equational abstractions. In: Baader, F. (ed.) CADE 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2741, pp. 2–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapur, D., Subramaniam, M.: New uses of linear arithmetic in automated theorem proving by induction. Journal of Automated Reasoning 16, 39–78 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Mart´ı-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Quesada, J.: Maude: Specification and programming in rewriting logic. Theoretical Computer Science 285, 187–243 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Misra, J.: Powerlist: a structure for parallel recursion. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 16, 1737–1767 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hendrix, J., Clavel, M., Meseguer, J.: A sufficient completeness reasoning tool for partial specifications (extended technical report) (2005), Available on tool website at http://maude.cs.uiuc.edu/tools/scc/

  9. Clavel, M.: The ITP tool’s home page (2005), http://maude.sip.ucm.es/itp

  10. Guttag, J.: The Specification and Application to Programming of Abstract Data Types. PhD thesis, University of Toronto Computer Science Department, Report CSRG-59 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guttag, J.V., Horning, J.J.: The algebraic specification of abstract data types. Acta Inf. 10, 27–52 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Nipkow, T., Weikum, G.: A decidability result about sufficient-completeness of axiomatically specified abstract data types. In: Cremers, A.B., Kriegel, H.-P. (eds.) GI-TCS 1983. LNCS, vol. 145, pp. 257–268. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kapur, D., Narendran, P., Zhang, H.: On sufficient-completeness and related properties of term rewriting systems. Acta Informatica 24, 395–415 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapur, D., Narendran, P., Rosenkrantz, D.J., Zhang, H.: Sufficient-completeness, ground-reducibility and their complexity. Acta Informatica 28, 311–350 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Comon, H., Dauchet, M., Gilleron, R., Jacquemard, F., Lugiez, D., Tison, S., Tommasi, M.: Tree automata techniques and applications (1997), Available on: http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/tata release (October 1, 2002)

  16. Bouhoula, A., Rusinowitch, M.: SPIKE: A system for automatic inductive proofs. In: Alagar, V.S., Nivat, M. (eds.) AMAST 1995. LNCS, vol. 936, pp. 576–577. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kapur, D.: An automated tool for analyzing completeness of equational specifications. In: Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), Seattle, WA, USA. Software Engineering Notes, Special Issue, August 17-19, pp. 28–43. ACM Press, New York (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohsaki, H., Seki, H., Takai, T.: Recognizing boolean closed a-tree languages with membership conditional rewriting mechanism. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) RTA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2706, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Meseguer, J.: Building equational proving tools by reflection in rewriting logic. In: Cafe: An Industrial-Strength Algebraic Formal Method, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Durán, F., Lucas, S., Meseguer, J., Marché, C., Urbain, X.: Proving termination of membership equational programs. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-based Program Manipulation, Verona, Italy, August 24-25, pp. 147–158. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lucas, S., Meseguer, J., Marché, C.: Operational termination of generalized conditional term rewriting systems. Submitted (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hendrix, J., Clavel, M., Meseguer, J. (2005). A Sufficient Completeness Reasoning Tool for Partial Specifications. In: Giesl, J. (eds) Term Rewriting and Applications. RTA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3467. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32033-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32033-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25596-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32033-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics