Abstract
In this paper, the impact of the size of the training set on the benefit from ensemble, i.e. the gains obtained by employing ensemble learning paradigms, is empirically studied. Experiments on Bagged/ Boosted J4.8 decision trees with/without pruning show that enlarging the training set tends to improve the benefit from Boosting but does not significantly impact the benefit from Bagging. This phenomenon is then explained from the view of bias-variance reduction. Moreover, it is shown that even for Boosting, the benefit does not always increase consistently along with the increase of the training set size since single learners sometimes may learn relatively more from additional training data that are randomly provided than ensembles do. Furthermore, it is observed that the benefit from ensemble of unpruned decision trees is usually bigger than that from ensemble of pruned decision trees. This phenomenon is then explained from the view of error-ambiguity balance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, E., Kohavi, R.: An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and variants. Machine Learning 36, 105–139 (1999)
Blake, C., Keogh, E., Merz, C.J.: UCI repository of machine learning databases, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html
Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24, 123–140 (1996)
Breiman, L.: Bias, variance, and arcing classifiers. Technical Report 460, Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1996)
Dietterich, T.G.: Machine learning research: four current directions. AI Magazine 18, 97–136 (1997)
Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Computational Learning Theory, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 23–37 (1995)
German, S., Bienenstock, E., Doursat, R.: Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation 4, 1–58 (1992)
Krogh, A., Vedelsby, J.: Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning. In: Tesauro, G., Touretzky, D.S., Leen, T.K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 7, pp. 231–238. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhou, ZH., Wei, D., Li, G., Dai, H. (2004). On the Size of Training Set and the Benefit from Ensemble. In: Dai, H., Srikant, R., Zhang, C. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3056. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22064-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24775-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive