Collecting Weighted Coercions from Crowd-Sourced Lexical Data for Compositional Semantic Analysis

1. Asher, N.: Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

   Book  Google Scholar 

2. Bekki, D.: Dependent type semantics: an introduction. In: Christoff, Z., Galeazzi, P., Gierasimczuk, N., Marcoci, A., Smet, S. (eds.) Logic and Interactive RAtionality (LIRa) Yearbook 2012. vol. I, pp. 277–300. University of Amsterdam (2014)

   Google Scholar 

3. Chamberlain, J., Fort, K., Kruschwitz, U., Lafourcade, M., Poesio, M.: Using games to create language resources: successes and limitations of the approach. In: Gurevych, I., Kim, J. (eds.) The People’s Web Meets NLP. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, pp. 3–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35085-6_1

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Chatzikyriakidis, S., Lafourcade, M., Ramadier, L., Zarrouk, M.: Modern type theories and lexical networks: using serious games as the basis for multi-sorted typed systems. J. Lang. Model. 5, 229–272 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

5. Chatzikyriakidis, S., Luo, Z.: Natural language inference in coq. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 23(4), 441–480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-014-9208-x

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

6. Cooper, R.: Copredication, dynamic generalized quantification and lexical innovation by coercion. In: Fourth International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon (2007)

   Google Scholar 

7. Cruse, D.A.: Lexical Semantics. Cambridge, New York (1986)

   Google Scholar 

8. Fass, D., Wilks, Y.: Preference semantics, ill-formedness, and metaphor. Comput. Linguist. 9(3–4), 178–187 (1983). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1334.980082

   Google Scholar 

9. Im, S., Lee, C.: A developed analysis of type coercion using asher’s TCL and conventionality. In: Cooper, R., Retoré, C. (eds.) Extended Abstracts of the ESSLLI 2015 Workshop TYTLES: Types Theory and Lexical Semantics, pp. 91–99, August 2015. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01584832

10. Lafourcade, M.: Making people play for lexical acquisition with the JeuxDeMots prototype. In: SNLP 2007: 7th International Symposium on Natural Language Processing, Pattaya, Chonburi, Thailand, p. 7, December 2007. https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-00200883

11. Lafourcade, M., Brun, N.L.: Ambiguss, a game for building a sense annotated corpus for French. In: IWCS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

12. Lascarides, A.: The pragmatics of word meaning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series: Representation and Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge: Polysemy, Ambiguity and Generativity, pp. 75–80 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

13. Luo, Z.: Contextual analysis of word meanings in type-theoretical semantics. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736, pp. 159–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

14. Luo, Z.: Common nouns as types. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) LACL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 173–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

15. Mery, B.: Challenges in the computational implementation of montagovian lexical semantics. In: Kurahashi, S., Ohta, Y., Arai, S., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10247, pp. 90–107. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61572-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Mery, B., Moot, R., Retoré, C.: Computing the semantics of plurals and massive entities using many-sorted types. In: Murata, T., Mineshima, K., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9067, pp. 144–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_11. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01214435

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

17. Mery, B., Moot, R., Retoré, C.: Typed Hilbert operators for the lexical semantics of singular and plural determiner phrases. In: Epsilon 2015 - Hilbert’s Epsilon and Tau in Logic, Informatics and Linguistics. Montpellier, France, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

18. Mery, B., Retoré, C.: Are books events? ontological inclusions as coercive sub-typing, lexical transfers as entailment. In: LENLS 2012, in jSAI 2015. Kanagawa, Japan, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

19. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Moot, R.: The grail theorem prover: type theory for syntax and semantics. In: Chatzikyriakidis, S., Luo, Z. (eds.) Modern Perspectives in Type-Theoretical Semantics. SLP, vol. 98, pp. 247–277. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50422-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

21. Nagao, K.: A preferential constraint satisfaction technique for natural language analysis. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 77(2), 161–170 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

22. Pustejovsky, J.: The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

23. Retoré, C.: The Montagovian Generative Lexicon Lambda Ty\(_n\): a Type Theoretical Framework for Natural Language Semantics. In: 19th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 26, pp. 202–229. Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references