Abstract
This paper reports on the authors’ ongoing collaboration on model co-creation, a process that involves not only the reconciliation of methodologies (qualitative vs. quantitative), but also of epistemologies (empirical vs empirical/rationalist) and ontologies (observable referent vs. abstracted referent). The co-creation process has taken place over several months, from early 2017, both in person, teleconferencing and via email. The result was an ethnographic model of the refugee situation in Lesbos, Greece. The qualifier “ethnographic” means that the simulation’s purpose was to capture the problem situation described by ethnographers in a manner that resembles their observations, not to answer a research question. Ethnographers used the modeling process – mostly elicitation and variable identification - to think about questions they had not considered in the field. Further, the used the prototype model to further narrow their desired modeling scope and ask new questions. Lastly, notes captured by the ethnographers in the field highlight the challenges of the modeling situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Italicized paragraphs at the beginning of each section are from ethnographers’ field notes.
- 2.
We follow this terminology here for simplicity of explanation, acknowledging that social scientists and modelers may have a number of different ways to describe the process.
- 3.
Citizen Initiatives for Global Solidarity (CIGS) is the term coined to reflect emergent actors in the humanitarian sector, the main focus of the ethnographers’ research.
References
Rwashana, A.S., Williams, D.W., Neema, S.: System dynamics approach to immunization healthcare issues in developing countries: a case study of Uganda. Health Inform. J. 15, 95–107 (2009)
Dilaver, O.: From participants to agents: grounded simulation as a mixed-method research design. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 18, 15 (2015)
Epstein, J.M.: Why model? J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 11, 12 (2008)
Ghorbani, A., Dijkema, G., Schrauwen, N.: Structuring qualitative data for agent-based modelling. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 18, 2 (2015)
Gibbs, G.R.: Analysing Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, SAGE (2008)
John, L., Lyn, L.H.: Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1995)
Tolk, A., Diallo, S.Y., Padilla, J.J., Herencia-Zapana, H.: Reference modelling in support of M&S: foundations and application. J. Simul. 7, 69–82 (2013)
Vennix, J.A.M.: Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 15, 379–401 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Padilla, J.J., Frydenlund, E., Wallewik, H., Haaland, H. (2018). Model Co-creation from a Modeler’s Perspective: Lessons Learned from the Collaboration Between Ethnographers and Modelers. In: Thomson, R., Dancy, C., Hyder, A., Bisgin, H. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93371-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93372-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)