Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Recognition of Business Process Elements in Natural Language Texts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2017)

Abstract

Process modeling is a complex and important task in any business process management project. Gathering information to build a process model needs effort by analysts in different ways, such as interviews and document review. However, this documentation is not always well structured and can be difficult to be understood. Thus, techniques that allow the structuring and recognition of process elements in the documentation can help in the understanding of the process and, consequently, in the modeling activity. In this context, this paper proposes an approach to recognize business process elements in natural language texts. We defined a set of 32 mapping rules to recognize business process elements in texts using natural language processing techniques and which were identified through an empirical study in texts containing descriptions of a process. Furthermore, a prototype was developed and it showed promising results. The analyses of 70 texts revealed 73.61% precision, 70.15% recall and 71.82% F-measure. Moreover, two surveys showed that 93.33% of participants agree with the mapping rules and that the approach helps the analysts in both the time spent and the effort made in the process modeling task. This paper is a reiteration and an evolution of the work presented in Ferreira et al. [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://gate.ac.uk/; last accessed 2017-10-02.

  2. 2.

    http://www.nltk.org/; last accessed 2017-10-02.

  3. 3.

    https://spacy.io/; last accessed 2017-10-02.

  4. 4.

    https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PyDictionary; last accessed 2017-10-02.

  5. 5.

    thesaurus.com.

  6. 6.

    https://www.google.com/forms/about; last accessed: 2016-11-17.

  7. 7.

    https://goo.gl/REUmu6; last accessed 2016-11-12.

  8. 8.

    https://goo.gl/rPLqXE; last accessed 2016-11-12.

  9. 9.

    https://goo.gl/KuQOBw; last accessed 2016-11-12.

  10. 10.

    https://goo.gl/MxzAAH; last accessed 2016-11-12.

References

  1. Ferreira, R.C.B., Thom, L.H., Fantinato, M.: A semi-automatic approach to identify business process elements in natural language texts (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thom, L.H.: Gerenciamento de Processos de Negócio e Aplicabilidade na Saúde e na Robótica. Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Computação (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thom, L., Reichert, M., Iochpe, C.: Activity patterns in process-aware information systems: basic concepts and empirical evidence. Int. J. Bus. Process Integr. Manag. (IJBPIM) 4, 93–110 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Leopold, H.: Natural Language in Business Process Models. Springer, Switzerland (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04175-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Blumberg, R., Atre, S.: The problem with unstructured data. DM Rev. 13, 62 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. White, M.: Information overlook. vol. 26, p. 7 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedrich, F., Mendling, J., Puhlmann, F.: Process model generation from natural language text. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Chueng, A., Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.: Process discovery from model and text artefacts. In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Services, pp. 167–174 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goncalves, J.C.A., Santoro, F.M., Baião, F.A.: Let me tell you a story - on how to build process models. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 17, 276–295 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira, R.C.B., Thom, L.H., de Oliveira, J.P.M., Avila, D.T., dos Santos, R.I., Fantinato, M.: Assisting process modeling by identifying business process elements in natural language texts. In: de Cesare, S., Frank, U. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10651, pp. 154–163. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70625-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Santoro, F.M., Goncalves, J.C.A., Baiao, F.A.: Business process mining from group stories. In: International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 161–166 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiexun, L., Wang, H.J., Zhang, Z., Zhao, J.L.: A policy-based process mining framework: mining business policy texts for discovering process models. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 8, 169–188 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: Supporting process model validation through natural language generation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 40, 816–840 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meitz, M., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: An approach to support process model validation based on text generation. 33, 7–20 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Detecting inconsistencies between process models and textual descriptions. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9253, pp. 90–105. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Aa, H., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Dealing with behavioral ambiguity in textual process descriptions. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 271–288. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Heinonen, O.: Optimal multi-paragraph text segmentation by dynamic programming. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 2, ACL 1998, pp. 1484–1486. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hearst, M.A.: Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 1994, pp. 9–16. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hearst, M.A.: TextTiling: segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Comput. Linguist. 23, 33–64 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hynes, G., Bexley, J.: Understandability of banks’ annual reports. In: 69th Association for Business Communication Annual Convention, Albuquerque, pp. 1–11 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferreira, R.C.B., Thom, L.H.: An approach to generate process-oriented text from natural language. In: XII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, p. 77 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. WfMC: Wfmc: Process definition language: XPDL 2.0, p. 164 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morris, J., Hirst, G.: Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Comput. Linguist. 17, 21–48 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Allen, J.: Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. de Kok, D., Brouwer, H.: Natural Language Processing for the Working Programmer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brill, E.: A simple rule-based part of speech tagger. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, ANLC 1992, pp. 152–155. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Briscoe, T., Carroll, J., Watson, R.: The second release of the RASP system. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive Presentation Sessions, COLING-ACL 2006, pp. 77–80. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Choi, J.D., Palmer, M.: Guidelines for the Clear Style Constituent to Dependency Conversion. Technical report 01–12, University of Colorado Boulder (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. OMG: Business process modeling notation (BPMN). versão 2.0.2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mendling, J., Neumann, G., van der Aalst, W.: Understanding the occurrence of errors in process models based on metrics. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 113–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Figl, K., Recker, J., Mendling, J.: A study on the effects of routing symbol design on process model comprehension. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 1104–1118 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kossak, F., Illibauer, C., Geist, V.: Event-based gateways: open questions and inconsistencies. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPMN 2012. LNBIP, vol. 125, pp. 53–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33155-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Kindler, E.: On the semantics of EPCs: resolving the vicious circle. Data Knowl. Eng. 56, 23–40 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 127–136 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mendling, J.: Managing structural and textual quality of business process models. In: Cudre-Mauroux, P., Ceravolo, P., Gašević, D. (eds.) SIMPDA 2012. LNBIP, vol. 162, pp. 100–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40919-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendling, J., Strembeck, M., Recker, J.C.: Factors of process model comprehension : findings from a series of experiments. Decis. Support Syst. 53, 195–206 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What makes process models understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Schrepfer, M., Wolf, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: The impact of secondary notation on process model understanding. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 161–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05352-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Reijers, H., Mendling, J.: Modularity in process models: review and effects. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 20–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. White, S.A.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide: Understanding and Using BPMN. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Japkowicz, N., Shah, M.: Evaluating Learning Algorithms: A Classification Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Forbes, A.D.: Classification-algorithm evaluation: five performance measures based onconfusion matrices. J. Clin. Monit. 11, 189–206 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucinéia Heloisa Thom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferreira, R.C.B., Silva, T.S., Avila, D.T., Thom, L.H., Fantinato, M. (2018). Recognition of Business Process Elements in Natural Language Texts. In: Hammoudi, S., Śmiałek, M., Camp, O., Filipe, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 321. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93375-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93375-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93374-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93375-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics