Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Understanding Governance Mechanisms and Health in Software Ecosystems: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 321))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a software ecosystem, organizations work collaboratively to remain profitable and survive market changes. For the relationship between these organizations to succeed, it is necessary to participate in the ecosystem software without violating rules of collaboration or to take advantages that destabilize the general health of the ecosystem. The application of governance mechanisms is essential for achieving this balance. Governance mechanisms are employed to define the level of control, rights of decision and scope of owner versus shared ownership in an ecosystem. Selecting appropriate governance mechanisms, organizations can gain strategic advantage over others leading them to better performance and, consequently, to be healthier. In this article, we report a systematic literature review that aggregates definitions of software ecosystem governance and classify governance mechanisms in three dimensions: value creation, coordination of players, and organizational openness and control. Additionally, we propose a research agenda that addresses relevant topics for researchers and practitioners to explore these issues. Initially, we performed a systematic literature review of 63 primary studies. In this extended article, we have included more 26 studies to analyze the relation between health and governance. In total, we reviewed 89 studies. 52 metrics were identified and classified into the three health elements (productivity, robustness, niche creation). Our results suggest that software ecosystems governance determines decision rights between platform owners and extension developers, control mechanisms used by the platform owner, and platform ownership. We posit that ecosystem health is under the direct influence of how governance mechanisms are implemented by ecosystem’s players.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbosa, O., Santos, R., Alves; C., Werner, C., Jansen, S.: A systematic mapping study on software ecosystems through a three-dimensional perspective. In: Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry, pp. 59–81. Edward Elgar Publishing, UK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch, J., Bosch-Sijtsema, P.: ESAO: a holistic ecosystem-driven analysis model. In: Lassenius, C., Smolander, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2014. LNBIP, vol. 182, pp. 179–193. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 187–190 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iyer, B., Dreyfus, D., Gyllstrom, P.: A network-based view of enterprise architecture. Handbook of Enterprise Systems Architecture in Practice, pp. 500–525 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manikas, K., Hansen, K.M.: Software ecosystems – a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 86(5), 1294–1306 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 675–687 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. West, J., Wood, D.: Creating and Evolving an Open Innovation Ecosystem: Lessons from Symbian Ltd. Available at SSRN Working Paper Series (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. den Hartigh, M., Visscher, W.: The health measurement of a business ecosystem. In: proceedings of the European Network on Chaos and Complexity Research and Management Practice Meeting. pp. 1–39 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wareham, J., Fox, P.B., Cano Giner, J.L.: Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4), 1195–1215 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alves, C., Oliveira, J.A., Jansen, S.: Software ecosystems governance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. In: 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Review in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report, 2.3, Keele University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cruzes D., Dybå, T.: Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M.: Lesson from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80(4), 571–583 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franco-Bedoya, O., Ameller, D., Costal, D., Franch, X.: Queso a quality model for open source software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (ICSOFT-EA’S3), pp. 209–221 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manikas, K.: Revisiting software ecosystems research: a longitudinal literature study. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 84–103 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brhel, M., Meth, H., Maedcher, A.: Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development: a literature review. Inf. Soft. Technol. 61, 163–181 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen, G., Dyba, T.: Theoretical foundations of software ecosystems. International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Axelsson, J., Skoglund, M.: Quality assurance in software ecosystems: a systematic literature mapping and research agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 114, 69–81 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manikas, K., Hansen, M.K.: Reviewing the health of software ecosystems - a conceptual framework proposal. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO 2013), in ICSOB, pp. 33–44 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goeminne, M., Claes, M., Mens, T.: A historical dataset for the Gnome ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barbosa, O., Alves, C.: A systematic mapping study on software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO 2011) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fotrousi, F., Fricker, Samuel A., Fiedler, M., Le-Gall, F.: KPIs for software ecosystems: a systematic mapping study. In: Lassenius, C., Smolander, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2014. LNBIP, vol. 182, pp. 194–211. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Papatheocharous, E., Andersson, J., Axelsson, J.: Ecosystems and open innovation for embedded systems: a systematic mapping study. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB 2015), pp. 81–95 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hyrynsalmi, S., Seppanen, M., Nokkala, T., Suominen, A., Jarvi, A.: Wealthy, Healthy and/or Happy — What does ‘Ecosystem Health’ Stand for? ICSOB 2015, pp. 272–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Corporate governance. Enterp. Governance Enterp. Eng. 3(1), 3–11 (2009). Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Informática, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Carina Alves & Joyce Oliveira

  2. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Engenharia, Cuiabá, Brazil

    Joyce Oliveira

  3. Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Slinger Jansen

Authors
  1. Carina Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joyce Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Slinger Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Alves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. MODESTE/ESEO, Angers, France

    Slimane Hammoudi

  2. Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

    Michał Śmiałek

  3. MODESTE/ESEO, Angers, France

    Olivier Camp

  4. INSTICC, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Poland

    Joaquim Filipe

Appendix

Appendix

  1. S1.

    Albert. B.E., Santos, R.P., Werner, C.:. Software ecosystems governance to enable IT architecture based on software asset management. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (2013).

  2. S2.

    Alspaugh, T.A., Asuncion, H. U., Scacchi, W.: The Role of Software Licenses in Open Architecture Ecosystems. In proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO’09), pp. 4–18 (2010).

  3. S3.

    Axelsson, J., Papatheocharous, E., Andersson, J.: Characteristics of software ecosystems for Federated Embedded Systems: A case study. Information and Software Technology, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp. 1457–1475 (2014).

  4. S4.

    Baars, A., Jansen, S.: A framework for software ecosystem governance. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB’12), pp. 168–180 (2012).

  5. S5.

    Bosch, J., Bosch-Sijtsema, M.P.: Esao: A Holistic Ecosystem-Driven Analysis Model. In Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB 2014), Springer Verlag, pp. 179–193 (2014).

  6. S6.

    Burkard, C., Widjaja, T., Buxmann, P.,. Software ecosystems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, volume 4, Issue. 1, pp. 41–44 (2012).

  7. S7.

    Campbell, P., Ahmed, F.: A three-dimensional view of software ecosystems. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume (ECSA ‘10), CarlosE. Cuesta (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 81–84 (2010).

  8. S8.

    Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., Wu, D.J.: Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, Forthcoming (2011).

  9. S9.

    Che, M., Perry, D.E.: Architectural Design Decisions in Open Software Development: A Transition to Soft/ware Ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 58–61 (2014).

  10. S10.

    Den Hartigh, E., Tol, M., Visscher, W.: The health measurement of a business ecosystem. In proceedings of the European Network on Chaos and Complexity Research and Management Practice Meeting. pp. 1–39 (2006).

  11. S11.

    Dittrich, Y.: Software engineering beyond the project – Sustaining software ecosystems. Information and Software Technology, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp. 1436–1456 (2014).

  12. S12.

    Dubinsky, Y., Kruchten, P.: Software development governance (sdg): report on 2nd workshop. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Volume 34, pp. 46–47 (2009).

  13. S13.

    Eisenmann, T.R., Parker, G., M.W.; Van Alstyne, M.W.: Opening platforms: how, when and why? In Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Gawer A (ed). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, pp. 131–162 (2008).

  14. S14.

    Eklund, U., Bosch, J.: Introducing software ecosystems for mass-produced embedded systems. In Software Business. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 248–254 (2012).

  15. S15.

    Fricker. S.: Requirements Value Chains: Stakeholder Management and Requirements Engineering in Software Ecosystems. In proceedings of Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ’10), volume 6182, pp. 60–66 (2010).

  16. S16.

    Fricker, S.: Specification and Analysis of Requirements Negotiation Strategy in Software Ecosystems. In proceedings of Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 19–33 (2009).

  17. S17.

    Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp. 417–433 (2014).

  18. S18.

    Gawer, A., Henderson, R.: Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp. 1–34 (2007).

  19. S19.

    Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, pp. 29–30 (2002).

  20. S20.

    Ghazawne, A., Henfridsson, O.: Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. In proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS’ 10), AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), pp 1–18 (2010).

  21. S21.

    Goldbach, T., Kemper, V.K.: Should I Stay or should I go? the effects of control mechanisms on app developers´ intention to stick with a platform. In proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS’S3) (2014).

  22. S22.

    Haile, N., Altmann, J.: Value creation in software service platforms. Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 55, pp. 495–509 (2016).

  23. S23.

    Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A., Makila, T., Jarvi, A., Knuutila, T.: Revenue models of application developers in android market ecosystem. In M. Cusumano, B. Iyer, N. Venkatraman, eds.: ICSOB 2012. Number 114 in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer Heidelberg (2012).

  24. S24.

    Huang, P., Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Wu, D.J.: Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Science, Vol 59, Issue 1 (2013).

  25. S25.

    Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review. Vol 82, Issue 3 (2004).

  26. S26.

    Iyer, B., Lee,C.H., Venkatraman, N.: Managing a small world ecosystem: Some lessons from the software sector. California Management Review, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp. 28–47 (2006).

  27. S27.

    James, W.P., and De Meyer, A.: Ecosystem advantage: how to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review, Volume 55, Issue 1 (2012): 24–46 (2012).

  28. S28.

    Jansen, S., Cusumano, M.:. Defining Software Ecosystems: A Survey of Software Platforms and Business Network Governance. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO ’12), pp. 41–58 (2012).

  29. S29.

    Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 187–190 (2009).

  30. S30.

    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.:. Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems. In proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO’09). pp. 34–48 (2009).

  31. S31.

    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., Luinenburg, L.: The open software enterprise model: how open is my software business? In Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 159–186 (2013).

  32. S32.

    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., Luinenburg, L.: Shades of gray: Opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. Journal of System and Software. Volume 85, Issue 7, pp. 1495–1510 (2012).

  33. S33.

    Jansen, S.: Opening the Ecosystem Flood Gates: Architecture Challenges of Opening Interfaces Within a Product Portfolio. In proceedings of European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA’15), Springer International Publishing, pp. 121–136 (2015).

  34. S34.

    Jansen, S.: Measuring the health of open source software ecosystems: Beyond the scope of project health. Information and Software Technology, Volume, 56, Issue 11, pp. 1508–1519 (2014).

  35. S35.

    Kapoor, R., Lee, J.M.: Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp. 274–296 (2013).

  36. S36.

    Kim, H.J., Kim, L., Lee, H.: Third-party mobile app developers’ continued participation in platform-centric ecosystems: An empirical investigation of two different mechanisms. International Journal of Information Management, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp. 44–59 (2016).

  37. S37.

    Knauss, E., Damian, D., Knauss, A., Borici, A.: Openness and requirements: Opportunities and tradeoffs in software ecosystems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’S3), 2014, pp. 213–222 (2014).

  38. S38.

    Koch, S., Kerschbaum, M.: Joining a smartphone ecosystem: Application developers’ motivations and decision criteria. Information and Software Technology, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp. 1423–1435 (2014).

  39. S39.

    Manikas, K., Klaus, M.H., and Kyng, M,K.: Governance mechanisms for healthcare apps. In Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops. ACM, p. 10 (2014).

  40. S40.

    Mizushima, K., Ikawa,Y.: A structure of cocreation in an open source software ecosystem: A case study of the eclipse community. In Proceedings of Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET’11). pp. 1–8 (2011).

  41. S41.

    Monteith, J.Y., McGregor, J.D., Ingram, J.E.:. Proposed metrics on ecosystem health. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international workshop on Software-defined ecosystems (BigSystem’S3), ACM, pp. 33–36 (2014).

  42. S42.

    Mukhopadhyay, S., de Reuver, M., and Bouwman, H.: Effectiveness of control mechanisms in mobile platform ecosystem. Telematics and Informatics, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp. 848–859 (2016).

  43. S43.

    Olsson, H., and Bosch, J. Strategic Ecosystem Management: A multi-case study on challenges and strategies for different ecosystem types. In proceedings of Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA’15), pp. 398–401 (2015).

  44. S44.

    Pilinkienė, V., Mačiulis, P.: Comparison of Different Ecosystem Analogies: The Main Economic Determinants and Levels of Impact. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 156, Issue 26, pp. 365–370.

  45. S45.

    Popp, K.M.: Goals of Software Vendors for Partner Ecosystems – A Practitioner ́s View. In proceedings of First International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB’10). Springer: pp. 181–186 (2010).

  46. S46.

    Sadi, M.H., Yu, E.: Designing Software Ecosystems: How Can Modeling Techniques Help?In proceedings of Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. Springer International Publishing, pp. 360–375 (2015).

  47. S47.

    Sadi, H., Yu, E.: Analyzing the evolution of software development: From creative chaos to software ecosystems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS’S3), pp. 1–11 (2014).

  48. S48.

    Santos, R., Werner, C.: Treating social dimension in software ecosystems through ReuseECOS approach. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems Technologies (DEST’12), pp. 1–6 (2012).

  49. S49.

    Schönberger, A., Elsner, C.: Modeling Partner Networks for Systematic Architecture Derivation in Software Ecosystems. In: Linnhoff-Popien, Claudia; Zaddach, Michael; Grahl, Andreas (Ed.): Marktplätze im Umbruch – Digital e Strategien für Services in Mobilen Internet. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 655–665 (2015).

  50. S50.

    Schultis, K.B., Elsner, C., Lohmann, D.: Architecture challenges for internal software ecosystems: a large-scale industry case study. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE’S3), ACM, pp. 542–552 (2014).

  51. S51.

    Tiwana, A. Konsynski, B. Bush, A.: Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research. Volume 21, Issue 4, pp. 675–687 (2010).

  52. S52.

    Valenca, G., Alves, C., Heimann, V., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Competition and collaboration in requirements engineering: A case study of an emerging software ecosystem. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’S3), pp. 384–393 (2014).

  53. S53.

    van Angeren, J., Kabbedijk, K., Popp, K., Jansen, S.: Managing software ecosystems through partnering. In Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 85–102 (2013).

  54. S54.

    van Angeren, J., Alves, C., Jansen, S.: Can We Ask You To Collaborate? Analyzing App Developer Relationships in Commercial Platform Ecosystems. Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 113, pp. 430–445 (2016).

  55. S55.

    van Angeren, J., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Exploring the relationship between partnership model participation and interfirm network structure: An analysis of the office365 ecosystem, In Proceedings of Software Business (ICSOB’S3). Springer, pp. 1–15 (2014).

  56. S56.

    Ven, K., Mannaert, H.: Challenges and strategies in the use of Open Source Software by Independent Software Vendors. Information and Software Technology, Volume 50, Issues 9–10, pp. 991–1002 (2008).

  57. S57.

    Viljainen, M., Kauppinen., M.: Framing Management practices for keystones in platform ecosystems. In Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 121–137 (2013).

  58. S58.

    Viljainen, M., Kauppinen, M. Software Ecosystems: A Set of Management Practices for Platform Integrators in the Telecom Industry. In proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Software Business. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 32–43 (2011).

  59. S59.

    Wareham, J., Fox, P.B., CanoGiner, J.L. Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science Volume 25, Issue 4, pp. 1195–1215 (2014).

  60. S60.

    West, J., and Wood, D.: Creating and Evolving an Open Innovation Ecosystem: Lessons from Symbian Ltd. Available at SSRN Working Paper Series (2008).

  61. S61.

    West, J., and Wood, D. Tradeoffs of Open Innovation Platform Leadership: The Rise and Fall of Symbian Ltd. In proceedings of Social Science and Technology Seminar Series (2011).

  62. S62.

    Wnuk, K., Manikas, K., Runeson, P., Lantz, M., Weijden, O., Munir, H.: Evaluating the governance model of hardware-centric software ecosystems: a case study of the axis ecosystem. In proceedings of 5th International Conference on Software Business, pp. 212–226 (2014).

  63. S63.

    Yu, E., Deng, S.:. Understanding Software Ecosystems: A Strategic Modelling Approach. In International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO’10) (2010)

  64. S64.

    Aarnoutse, F., Renes, C., Snijders, R., and Jansen, S.: The Reality of an Associate Model: Comparing Partner Activity in the Eclipse Ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops (ECSAW ‘14), ACM, pp. 6–8. (2014).

  65. S65.

    Alami, D., Rodríguez, M., and Jansen, S.: Relating Health to Platform Success: Exploring Three E-commerce Ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops (ECSAW ‘15), ACM, p. 43. (2015).

  66. S66.

    Ben Hadj Salem Mhamdia, A.: Performance measurement practices in software ecosystem. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Volume 62, Issue 5, pp. 514–533. 2013.

  67. S67.

    Cardoso, J.L., Barbin, S.E., and Silva Filho, O.S.: The public software ecosystem: exploratory survey. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (MEDES ‘13), ACM, pp. 289–296 (2013).

  68. S68.

    Costanza, R.: Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. Ecosystem health: New goals for environmental management, Island Press, pp. 239–256 (1992).

  69. S69.

    Den Hartigh, E., Visscher, W., Tol, M., and Salas, A.: Measuring the health of a business ecosystem. In Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 221–246 (2013).

  70. S70.

    Dhungana, D., Groher, I., Schludermann, E., and Biffl, S.: Software ecosystems vs. natural ecosystems: learning from the ingenious mind of nature. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume (ECSA ‘10), Carlos E. Cuesta (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 96–102 (2010).

  71. S71.

    Eckhardt, E., Kaats, E., Jansen, S., and Alves, C.: The Merits of a Meritocracy in Open Source Software Ecosystems. In Proceedings of European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops (ECSAW ‘14), ACM, p. 7 (2014).

  72. S72.

    Eklund U., and Bosch, J.: Using architecture for multiple levels of access to an ecosystem platform. In Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGSOFT conference on Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA ‘12), ACM, pp. 143–148 (2012).

  73. S73.

    German, D, M., Adams, B., Hassan, A. E.: The Evolution of the R Software Ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR’13), pp. 243–252 (2013).

  74. S74.

    Hoving, R., Slot, G., Jansen, S.: Python: Characteristics identification of a free open source software ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST’13), pp. 13–18 (2013).

  75. S75.

    Hyrynsalmi, S., Seppänen, M., Suominen, A.: Sources of value in application ecosystems. Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 96, pp. 61–72 (2014).

  76. S76.

    Iansiti, M., and Richards, G.L.: Information technology ecosystem: Structure, health, and performance. The Antitrust Bull., Volume 51, p. 77 (2006).

  77. S77.

    Iansiti, M., and Levien, R.: Keystones and Dominators: Framing Operating and Technology Strategy in a Business Ecosystem. Harvard Business School, Working Paper, p. 03–061 (2004).

  78. S78.

    Kabbedijk, J., and Jansen, S.: Unraveling Ruby ecosystem dynamics: a quantitative network analysis. In Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 322–332 (2013).

  79. S79.

    Kilamo, T., Hammouda, I., Mikkonen, T and Aaltonen, T.: Open source ecosystems: a tale of two cases. In Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 276–206 (2013).

  80. S80.

    Lucassen, G., van Rooij, K., Jansen, S.: Ecosystem health of cloud paas providers. In Software Business. From Physical Products to Software Services and Solutions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 183–194 (2013).

  81. S81.

    Lundell, B., Forssten, B., Gamalielsson, J., Gustavsson, H., Karlsson, R., Lennerholt, C., and Olsson, E.: Exploring health within OSS ecosystems. In proceedings of the First International Workshop on Building Sustainable Open Source Communities (OSCOMM’ 09) (2009).

  82. S82.

    Manikas, K., and D., Kontogiorgos, D.: Characterizing Software Activity: The Influence of Software to Ecosystem Health. In Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops (ECSAW ‘15), ACM, p. 46 (2015).

  83. S83.

    Manikas, K and Hansen, K.M. Reviewing the Health of Software Ecosystems-A Conceptual Framework Proposal. In proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO’13), in ICSOB, pp. 33–44 (2013).

  84. S84.

    McGregor, D. J.: A method for analyzing software product line ecosystems. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume (ECSA’10), Carlos E. Cuesta (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 73–80. 2010.

  85. S85.

    Spauwen, R., and Jansen, S.: Towards the roles and motives of open source software developers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO’13), p. 62 (2013).

  86. S86.

    Stefi, A., Berger, M., and Hess, T.: What Influences Platform Provider’s Degree of Openness?–Measuring and Analyzing the Degree of Platform Openness. In proceedings of Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery. Springer International Publishing, pp. 258–272 (2014).

  87. S87.

    Syed, S and Jansen, S.: On Clusters in Open Source Ecosystems. In proceedings of International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO’13), in ICSOB, pp. 19–32. (2013).

  88. S88.

    Teixeira, J., Robles, G., González-Barahona, J.M.: Lessons learned from applying social network analysis on an industrial Free/Libre/Open Source Software ecosystem. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 1–27 (2015).

  89. S89.

    Van Lingen, S., Palomba, A., and Lucassen, G.: On the software ecosystem health of open source content management systems. In proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO 2013), p. 38 (2013).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alves, C., Oliveira, J., Jansen, S. (2018). Understanding Governance Mechanisms and Health in Software Ecosystems: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Hammoudi, S., Śmiałek, M., Camp, O., Filipe, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 321. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93375-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93375-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93374-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93375-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation