Attitude Toward Online Peer-Assessment Activity: Experiential Learning Theory Viewpoint

1. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The learning way: meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simul. Gaming 40(3), 297–327 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Almeida, P.A.: Kolb’s experiential learning theory revisited. Adv. Psychol. Res. 102, 63–76 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

3. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The Kolb learning style inventory 4.0: a comprehensive guide to the theory, psychometrics, research on validity and educational applications. Hay Resources Direct, Boston, MA (2013)

   Google Scholar 

4. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1984)

   Google Scholar 

5. Ogut, E., Senol, Y., Yildirim, F.B.: Do learning styles affect study duration and academic success? Eur. J. Anat. 21(3), 235–240 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

6. Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R.E., Kolb, D.A.: Learning styles and adaptive flexibility - testing experiential learning theory. Manage. Learn. 33(1), 5–33 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Platsidou, M., Metallidou, P.: Validity and reliability issues of two learning style inventories in a Greek sample: Kolb learning style inventory and Felder Soloman’s index of learning styles. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 20(3), 324–335 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

8. Cassidy, S.: Learning styles an overview of theories, models and measures. Educ. Psychol. 24(4), 419–444 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A., Passarelli, A., Sharma, G.: On becoming an experiential educator: the educator role profile. Simul. Gaming 45(2), 204–234 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Novak, S., Shah, S., Wilson, J.P., Lawson, K.A., Salzman, R.D.: Pharmacy students’ learning styles before and after a problem-based learning experience. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 70(4), 74 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Topping, K.: Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility. In: Segers, M., Dochy, F., Cascallar, E. (eds.) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, pp. 55–87. Springer, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

12. Hsia, L.H., Huang, I., Hwang, G.J.: Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students’ performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Comput. Educ. 96, 55–71 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Cheng, K.H., Tsai, C.C.: Students’ interpersonal perspectives on, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 28(4), 599–618 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., van den Broek, P.: Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 43, 1–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

15. van Gennip, N.A.E., Segers, M.S.R., Tillema, H.H.: Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: the role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learn. Instr. 20(4), 280–290 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O.E., Zacharia, Z.C.: Peer versus expert feedback: an investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Comput. Educ. 71(Suppl. C), 133–152 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

17. Wang, X.M., Hwang, G.J., Liang, Z.Y., Wang, H.Y.: Enhancing students’ computer programming performances, critical thinking awareness and attitudes towards programming: an online peer assessment attempt. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20(4), 58–68 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

18. Murillo-Zamorano, L.R., Montanero, M.: Oral presentations in higher education: a comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 43, 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

19. Yu, F.Y., Wu, C.P.: Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16(1), 332–341 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

20. Li, K., Keller, J.M.: Use of the ARCS model in education: a literature review. Comput. Educ. 122, 54–62 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references