Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Concerns on the Differences Between AI and System Safety Mindsets Impacting Autonomous Vehicles Safety

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2018)

Abstract

The inflection point in the development of some core technologies enabled the Autonomous Vehicles (AV). The unprecedented growth rate in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) capabilities, focusing only on AVs, is expected to shift the transportation paradigm and bring relevant benefits to the society, such as accidents reduction. However, recent AVs accidents resulted in life losses. This paper presents a viewpoint discussion based on findings from a preliminary exploratory literature review. It was identified an important misalignment between AI and Safety research communities regarding the impact of AI on the safety risks in AV. This paper promotes this discussion, raises concerns on the potential consequences and suggests research topics to reduce the differences between AI and system safety mindsets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    a mindset is a set of assumptions, methods or notations held by one or more people or groups of people which is so established that it creates a powerful incentive within these people or groups to continue to adopt or accept prior behaviors, choices, or tools. …” [17]

References

  1. Singh, S.: Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey, Washington, DC (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dogan, E., Chatila, R., Chauvier, S., Evans, K., Hadjixenophontos, P., Perrin, J.: Ethics in the design of automated vehicles: the AVEthics project. In: EDIA@ ECAI, pp. 10–13 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meltz, D., Guterman, H.: RobIL—Israeli program for research and development of autonomous UGV: performance evaluation methodology. In: IEEE International Conference on the Science of Electrical Engineering (ICSEE), pp. 1–5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lugano, G.: Virtual assistants and self-driving cars. In: 2017 15th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST), pp. 1–5 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamdi, S., Faiedh, H., Souani, C., Besbes, K.: Road signs classification by ANN for real-time implementation. In: 2017 International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD), pp. 328–332 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yoneda, K., Kuramoto, A., Suganuma, N.: Convolutional neural network based vehicle turn signal recognition. In: 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), pp. 204–205 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z., Huang, X.: Accurate and reliable detection of traffic lights using multiclass learning and multiobject tracking. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 8, 28–42 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Habermann, D., Vido, C.E.O., Osório, F.S., Ramos, F.: Road junction detection from 3D point clouds. In: 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 4934–4940 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hossai, M.R.T., Shahjalal, M.A., Nuri, N.F.: Design of an IoT based autonomous vehicle with the aid of computer vision. In: International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE), pp. 752–756 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bock, J., Beemelmanns, T., Klösges, M., Kotte, J.: Self-learning Trajectory Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networks at Intelligent Intersections (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez Pulgarin, E.J., Herrmann, G., Leonards, U.: Drivers’ Manoeuvre classification for safe HRI. In: Gao, Y., Fallah, S., Jin, Y., Lekakou, C. (eds.) TAROS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10454, pp. 475–483. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Koopman, P.: Challenges in autonomous vehicle validation: keynote presentation abstract. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Safe Control of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles, p. 3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McAllister, R., et al.: Concrete problems for autonomous vehicle safety: advantages of Bayesian deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. NTSB: Collision Between a Car Operating with Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck Near Williston, Florida 7 May 2016. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/HAR1702.aspx

  15. NTSB: Preliminary Report Highway: HWY18MH010. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/HWY18MH010-prelim.aspx

  16. NTSB: Driver Errors, Overreliance on Automation, Lack of Safeguards, Led to Fatal Tesla Crash. https://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/PR20170912.aspx

  17. Leveson, N.G.: The use of safety cases in certification and regulation (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knight, W.: The Dark Secret at the Heart of AI. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/

  19. Mirnig, N., Stollnberger, G., Miksch, M., Stadler, S., Giuliani, M., Tscheligi, M.: To err is robot: how humans assess and act toward an erroneous social robot. Front. Robot. AI. 4, 21 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clarke, R.: Big data, big risks. Inf. Syst. J. 26, 77–90 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, K., Sun, L., Dix, A., Narasipuram, M.: Norm-based agency for designing collaborative information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 11, 229–247 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Committee on Legal Affairs: REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Delcker, J.: Europe divided over robot “personhood,” (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. King, W.R.: Editor’s comment decision support systems, artificial intelligence, and expert systems. MIS Q. 8, iv–v (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garret, O.: 10 Million Self-Driving Cars Will Hit The Road By 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliviergarret/2017/03/03/10-million-self-driving-cars-will-hit-the-road-by-2020-heres-how-to-profit/#3af8be847e50

  26. Harris, M.: Google reports self-driving car mistakes: 272 failures and 13 near misses (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wakabayashi, D.: Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. BBC: Tesla in fatal California crash was on Autopilot (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Research, Development and Innovation Center, Ericsson Telecomunicações S.A., Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Nascimento .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nascimento, A.M. et al. (2018). Concerns on the Differences Between AI and System Safety Mindsets Impacting Autonomous Vehicles Safety. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11094. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99228-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99229-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics