The Impact of Multidimensionality of Literacy on the Use of Digital Technology: Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives

1. Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: do they really think differently? Horizon 9(6), 1–6 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Gui, M., Argentin, G.: Digital skills of internet natives: different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Med. Soc. 13(6), 963–980 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Howe, N., Strauss, W.: Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. Vintage, New York (2000)

   Google Scholar 

5. Bruce, C.S.: Workplace experiences of information literacy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 19(1), 33–47 (1999)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Kerka, S.: Consumer education for the information age. Practice Application Brief 4, 12–15 (1999)

   Google Scholar 

7. Eshet-Alkalai, Y.: Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermed. 13(1), 93–106 (2004)

   Google Scholar 

8. Ng, W.: Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput. Educ. 59(3), 1065–1078 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Gilster, P.: Digital Literacy. Wiley, New York (1997)

   Google Scholar 

10. Martin, A.: DigEuLit–a European framework for digital literacy: a progress report. J. eLit. 2(2), 130–136 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

11. Eisenberg, M.B.: Information literacy: essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 28(2), 39–47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L.: The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 39(5), 775–786 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Gu, X., Zhu, Y., Guo, X.: Meeting the “digital natives”: understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16(1), 392–402 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

14. Bingimlas, K.A.: Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: a review of the literature. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 5(3), 235–245 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hew, K., Brush, T.: Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 55(3), 223–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Teo, T.: Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: model development and test. Comput. Educ. 57(4), 2432–2440 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Holden, H., Rada, R.: Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 43(4), 343–367 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Buabeng-Andoh, C.: Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Inf. Commun. Technol. 8(1), 136–155 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

20. Rozell, E.J., Gardner, W.L.: Computer-related success and failure: a longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 15(1), 1–10 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Kennedy, G.E., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., Krause, K.L.: First year students’ experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 24(1), 108–122 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., Howell, J.M.: Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15(1), 124–143 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press, New York (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

24. Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Internet High. Educ. 11(2), 71–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Park, S.Y.: An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(3), 150–162 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

26. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19(2), 189–211 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Wang, Q.E., Myers, M.D., Sundaram, D.: Digital natives and digital immigrants. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 5(6), 409–419 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Hargittai, E.: Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 23(3), 371–379 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Hargittai, E.: An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 27(1), 130–137 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Nikou, S., Mezei, J., Brännback, M.: Digital natives’ intention to interact with social media: value systems and gender. Telemat. Inform. 35(2), 421–435 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S.: Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 14(3), 396–402 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W.: Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12(4), 531–544 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

33. Ragin, C.C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987)

    Google Scholar 

34. Woodside, A.G.: Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. J. Bus. Res. 66(4), 463–472 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Ragin, C.C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

36. Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C.: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und fuzzy Sets. Barbara, Budrich (2007)

    Google Scholar 

37. Ragin, C.C.: Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Anal. 14(3), 291–310 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Ragin, C.C.: Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago University Press, Chicago (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

39. Ragin, C.C., Fiss, P.C.: Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: an empirical demonstration. In: Ragin, C.C. (ed.) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, pp. 190–212. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

40. Mikalef, P., Pateli, A.: Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. J. Bus. Res. 70(2017), 1–16 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references