Abstract
Nowadays, the wide spectrum of Intel Xeon processors is available. The new Zen CPU architecture developed by AMD has extended the number of options for x86_64 HPC hardware. This large number of options makes the optimal CPU choice for HPC systems not a straightforward procedure. Such a co-design procedure should follow the requests from the end-users community. Modern computational materials science studies are among the major consumers of HPC resources worldwide. The VASP code is perhaps the most popular tool for these research. In this work, we discuss the benchmark metric and results based on a VASP test model that give us the possibility to compare different CPUs and to select best options with respect to time-to-solution and energy-to-solution criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kresse, G., Hafner, J.: Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558
Kresse, G., Hafner, J.: Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251
Kresse, G., Furthmuller, J.: Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6(1), 15–50 (1996). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0927025696000080
Kresse, G., Furthmüller, J.: Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
Bethune, I.: Ab initio molecular dynamics. Introduction to Molecular Dynamics on ARCHER (2015). https://www.archer.ac.uk/training/course-material/2015/06/MolDy_Strath/AbInitioMD.pdf
Hutchinson, M.: VASP on GPUs. When and how. GPU technology theater, SC 2015 (2015). http://images.nvidia.com/events/sc15/pdfs/SC5107-vasp-gpus.pdf
Zhao, Z., Marsman, M.: Estimating the performance impact of the MCDRAM on KNL using dual-socket Ivy Bridge nodes on Cray XC30. In: Proceedings of the Cray User Group – 2016 (2016). https://cug.org/proceedings/cug2016_proceedings/includes/files/pap111.pdf
Kogge, P., Shalf, J.: Exascale computing trends: adjusting to the “new normal” for computer architecture. Comput. Sci. Eng. 15(6), 16–26 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2013.95
Burtscher, M., Kim, B.D., Diamond, J., McCalpin, J., Koesterke, L., Browne, J.: Perfexpert: An easy-to-use performance diagnosis tool for HPC applications. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2010, pp. 1–11. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2010.41
Rane, A., Browne, J.: Enhancing performance optimization of multicore/multichip nodes with data structure metrics. ACM Trans. Parallel Comput. 1(1), 3:1–3:20 (2014). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2588788
Stanisic, L., Mello Schnorr, L.C., Degomme, A., Heinrich, F.C., Legrand, A., Videau, B.: Characterizing the performance of modern architectures through opaque benchmarks: pitfalls learned the hard way. In: IPDPS 2017–31st IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (RepPar workshop), Orlando, USA (2017). https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01470399
Kutzner, C., Páll, S., Fechner, M., Esztermann, A., de Groot, B.L., Grubmüller, H.: Best bang for your buck: GPU nodes for GROMACS biomolecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 36(26), 1990–2008 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24030
Corsetti, F.: Performance analysis of electronic structure codes on HPC systems: a case study of SIESTA. PLOS One 9(4), 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095390
Stegailov, V.V., Orekhov, N.D., Smirnov, G.S.: HPC hardware efficiency for quantum and classical molecular dynamics. In: Malyshkin, V. (ed.) PaCT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9251, pp. 469–473. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21909-7_45
Hoefler, T., Belli, R.: Scientific benchmarking of parallel computing systems: twelve ways to tell the masses when reporting performance results. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2015, pp. 73:1–73:12. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2807591.2807644
Scogland, T., Azose, J., Rohr, D., Rivoire, S., Bates, N., Hackenberg, D.: Node variability in large-scale power measurements: perspectives from the Green500, Top500 and EEHPCWG. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2015, pp. 74:1–74:11. ACM, New York (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2807591.2807653
Calore, E., Schifano, S.F., Tripiccione, R.: Energy-performance tradeoffs for HPC applications on low power processors. In: Hunold, S., Costan, A., Giménez, D., Iosup, A., Ricci, L., Gómez Requena, M.E., Scarano, V., Varbanescu, A.L., Scott, S.L., Lankes, S., Weidendorfer, J., Alexander, M. (eds.) Euro-Par 2015. LNCS, vol. 9523, pp. 737–748. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27308-2_59
Rojek, K., Ilic, A., Wyrzykowski, R., Sousa, L.: Energy-aware mechanism for stencil-based MPDATA algorithm with constraints. In: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, p. e4016-n/a (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4016. Cpe.4016
Nikolskiy, V., Stegailov, V.: Floating-point performance of ARM cores and their efficiency in classical molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 681(1), 012049 (2016). http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/681/i=1/a=012049
Nikolskiy, V.P., Stegailov, V.V., Vecher, V.S.: Efficiency of the Tegra K1 and X1 systems-on-chip for classical molecular dynamics. In: 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing Simulation (HPCS), pp. 682–689 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCSim.2016.7568401
Vecher, V., Nikolskii, V., Stegailov, V.: GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics: energy consumption and performance. In: Voevodin, V., Sobolev, S. (eds.) RuSCDays 2016. CCIS, vol. 687, pp. 78–90. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55669-7_7
Cytowski, M.: Best Practice Guide – IBM Power 775, PRACE, November 2013. http://www.prace-ri.eu/IMG/pdf/Best-Practice-Guide-IBM-Power-775.pdf
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. Maciej Cytowski and Dr. Jacek Peichota (ICM, University of Warsaw) for the data on the VASP benchmark [22].
The authors acknowledge Joint Supercomputer Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences (http://www.jscc.ru) and Shared Resource Center “Far Eastern Computing Resource” IACP FEB RAS (http://cc.dvo.ru) for the access to the supercomputers MVS10P, MVS1P5 and IRUS17.
The work was supported by the grant No. 14-50-00124 of the Russian Science Foundation. A part of the equipment used in this work was purchased with financial support of HSE and using the President of Russian Federation grant for young researchers MD-9451.2016.8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stegailov, V., Vecher, V. (2017). Efficiency Analysis of Intel and AMD x86_64 Architectures for Ab Initio Calculations: A Case Study of VASP. In: Voevodin, V., Sobolev, S. (eds) Supercomputing. RuSCDays 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 793. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71255-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71255-0_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71254-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71255-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)