Abstract
Digital materials have become a popular medium for information access, and attracted a diverse group of users, such as college students, who benefit from the low cost of, and portable access to, the materials. However, college students with disabilities may have difficulty accessing electronic materials if the materials were not developed appropriately. Laws and standards provide guidance on making digital documents accessible, but these regulations are implemented slowly. As a result, published materials on the market may have accessibility issues. Efforts have been made to produce evaluation methods for eBooks. For example, automated tools have been used to check for accessibility aspects in multiple studies, but using automated tools to evaluate accessibility of electronic materials is not enough due to the complexity of the checkpoints. Thus, human evaluators are needed. This study assessed a newly developed accessibility evaluation methodology that was designed for e-textbooks, and examined whether books that were rated as higher in accessibility versus books that were rated lower in accessibility resulted in differences in user experience and performance. This study consisted of 6 students with visual impairments and 6 students with normal or corrected-to-normal vision, who read and interacted with eBooks. User experience and performance were measured using subjective questionnaires, reading time, and accuracy to content-related questions. We found differences in user experience ratings for eBooks that were rated as high or low in accessibility; however, we found no differences in users’ task performance as a function of the accessibility level of the eBook.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth, C.: Why accessibility? Libr. Technol. Rep. 48(7), 5 (2012)
Adobe. What is accessibility? (2016). http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/gettingstarted.html
W3C. Accessibility (2010). https://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility
Cool4Ed. About this project (2014). http://www.cool4ed.org/about.html
Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., Tomás, J.: The use of guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3(1), 71–79 (2004)
Web Accessibility Initiative. Introduction to web accessibility (2010). https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php
Sun, Y., Manabat, A.K.M., Chan, M., Chong, I., Vu, K.: Accessibility evaluation: manual development and tool selection for evaluating accessibility of e-textbooks (2016). http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-41691-5_28
Chan, M., Sun, Y., Tesoro, A., Vu, K.: Development of a scoring system for evaluating the accessibility of etextbooks (2016). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304995934_Development_of_a_Scoring_System_for_Evaluating_the_Accessibility_of_eTextbooks
SkillsCommons. Accessibility and SkillsCommons. http://support.taaccct.org/accessibility/
Sauro, J.: Measuring usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) (2011). http://www.measuringu.com/sus.php
Usability.gov. Heuristic evaluations and expert reviews (2014). http://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/heuristic-evaluation.html
Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2013)
Neilson J.: Beyond accessibility: treating users with disabilities as people (2001). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/beyond-accessibility-treating-users-with-disabilities-as-people/
Bayer, N., Pappas, L.: Accessibility testing: case history of blind testers of enterprise software. Tech. Commun. 53(1), 32–38 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sun, Y.T., Vu, KP.L., Strybel, T.Z. (2018). A Validation Test of an Accessibility Evaluation Method. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60491-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60492-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)