Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Validation Test of an Accessibility Evaluation Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability and User Experience (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 607))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Digital materials have become a popular medium for information access, and attracted a diverse group of users, such as college students, who benefit from the low cost of, and portable access to, the materials. However, college students with disabilities may have difficulty accessing electronic materials if the materials were not developed appropriately. Laws and standards provide guidance on making digital documents accessible, but these regulations are implemented slowly. As a result, published materials on the market may have accessibility issues. Efforts have been made to produce evaluation methods for eBooks. For example, automated tools have been used to check for accessibility aspects in multiple studies, but using automated tools to evaluate accessibility of electronic materials is not enough due to the complexity of the checkpoints. Thus, human evaluators are needed. This study assessed a newly developed accessibility evaluation methodology that was designed for e-textbooks, and examined whether books that were rated as higher in accessibility versus books that were rated lower in accessibility resulted in differences in user experience and performance. This study consisted of 6 students with visual impairments and 6 students with normal or corrected-to-normal vision, who read and interacted with eBooks. User experience and performance were measured using subjective questionnaires, reading time, and accuracy to content-related questions. We found differences in user experience ratings for eBooks that were rated as high or low in accessibility; however, we found no differences in users’ task performance as a function of the accessibility level of the eBook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Booth, C.: Why accessibility? Libr. Technol. Rep. 48(7), 5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adobe. What is accessibility? (2016). http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/gettingstarted.html

  3. W3C. Accessibility (2010). https://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility

  4. Cool4Ed. About this project (2014). http://www.cool4ed.org/about.html

  5. Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., Tomás, J.: The use of guidelines to automatically verify web accessibility. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3(1), 71–79 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Web Accessibility Initiative. Introduction to web accessibility (2010). https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php

  7. Sun, Y., Manabat, A.K.M., Chan, M., Chong, I., Vu, K.: Accessibility evaluation: manual development and tool selection for evaluating accessibility of e-textbooks (2016). http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-41691-5_28

  8. Chan, M., Sun, Y., Tesoro, A., Vu, K.: Development of a scoring system for evaluating the accessibility of etextbooks (2016). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304995934_Development_of_a_Scoring_System_for_Evaluating_the_Accessibility_of_eTextbooks

  9. SkillsCommons. Accessibility and SkillsCommons. http://support.taaccct.org/accessibility/

  10. Sauro, J.: Measuring usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) (2011). http://www.measuringu.com/sus.php

  11. Usability.gov. Heuristic evaluations and expert reviews (2014). http://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/heuristic-evaluation.html

  12. Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neilson J.: Beyond accessibility: treating users with disabilities as people (2001). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/beyond-accessibility-treating-users-with-disabilities-as-people/

  14. Bayer, N., Pappas, L.: Accessibility testing: case history of blind testers of enterprise software. Tech. Commun. 53(1), 32–38 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Ting Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, Y.T., Vu, KP.L., Strybel, T.Z. (2018). A Validation Test of an Accessibility Evaluation Method. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60492-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics