A Prognosis of Junior High School Students’ Performance Based on Active Learning Methods

1. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Cortez, P., Silva, A.M.G.: Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance (2008)

   Google Scholar 

3. Dasgupta, S.: Two faces of active learning. Theoretical Computer Science 412(19), 1767–1781 (2011)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

4. Hady, M.F.A., Schwenker, F.: Combining committee-based semi-supervised learning and active learning. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 25(4), 681–698 (2010)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

5. Hodges, J.L., Lehmann, E.L.: Rank methods for combination of independent experiments in analysis of variance. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33(2), 482–497 (1962)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

6. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2(5), 359–366 (1989)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. John, G.H., Langley, P.: Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1995)

   Google Scholar 

8. Kostopoulos, G., Kotsiantis, S., Pintelas, P.: Predicting student performance in distance higher education using semi-supervised techniques. In: Bellatreche, L., Manolopoulos, Y. (eds.) MEDI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9344, pp. 259–270. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23781-7_21

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Leng, Y., Xu, X., Qi, G.: Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning to construct SVM classifier. Knowledge-Based Systems 44, 121–131 (2013)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Ling, C.X., Huang, J., Zhang, H.: AUC: a statistically consistent and more discriminating measure than accuracy. IJCAI 3, 519–524 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

11. Livieris, I.E., Mikropoulos, T.A., Pintelas, P.: A decision support system for predicting students’ performance. Themes in Science and Technology Education 9(1), 43–57 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

12. Mamitsuka, N.A.H.: Query learning strategies using boosting and bagging. In: Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference (ICML 1998), vol. 1. Morgan Kaufmann Pub. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

13. Márquez-Vera, C., Cano, A., Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Predicting student failure at school using genetic programming and different data mining approaches with high dimensional and imbalanced data. Applied Intelligence 38(3), 315–330 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Platt, J.: Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines (1998)

    Google Scholar 

16. Ramirez-Loaiza, M.E., Sharma, M., Kumar, G., Bilgic, M.: Active learning: an empirical study of common baselines. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1–27 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

17. Reyes, O., Pérez, E., del Carmen Rodriguez-Hernández, M., Fardoun, H.M., Ventura, S.: JCLAL: a Java framework for active learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research 17(95), 1–5 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 3(1), 12–27 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

19. Settles, B., Craven, M.: An analysis of active learning strategies for sequence labeling tasks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1070–1079. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

20. Settles, B.: Active learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 6(1), 1–114 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

21. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 5(1), 3–55 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

22. Sharma, M., Bilgic, M.: Evidence-based uncertainty sampling for active learning. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31(1), 164–202 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

23. Slater, S., Joksimović, S., Kovanovic, V., Baker, R.S., Gasevic, D.: Tools for Educational Data Mining A Review. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics (2016)

    Google Scholar 

24. Stapel, M., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: An ensemble method to predict student performance in an online math learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, International Educational Data Mining Society, pp. 231–238 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

25. Triguero, I., García, S., Herrera, F.: Self-labeled techniques for semi-supervised learning: taxonomy, software and empirical study. Knowledge and Information Systems 42(2), 245–284 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A., Pal, C.J.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann (2016)

    Google Scholar 

27. Zhang, H.: The optimality of naive Bayes. AA 1(2), 3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

28. Zhou, Z.-H.: Learning with unlabeled data and its application to image retrieval. In: Yang, Q., Webb, G. (eds.) PRICAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4099, pp. 5–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-36668-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

29. Zhu, X., Lafferty, J., Ghahramani, Z.: Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: ICML 2003 Workshop on The Continuum From Labeled To Unlabeled Data in Machine Learning and Data Mining, vol. 3 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references