Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Formal Verification of ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) Through SMT-Based Model Checking - A Case Study -

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10510))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Internet protocols are intrinsically complex to understand and validate, due both to the potentially unbounded number of entities involved, and to the complexity of interactions amongst them. Yet, their safety is indispensable to guarantee the proper behavior of a number of critical applications.

In this work, we apply formal methods to verify the safety of the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP), a standard protocol of the TCP/IP stack i.e. the communication protocols used by any Internet Host, and we are able to formally prove that the ARP protocol, as defined by the standard Request for Comments, exhibits various vulnerabilities which have been exploited since many years and still are the main ingredient of many attack vectors. As a complementary result we also show the feasibility of formal verification methods when applied to real network protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We briefly recall that the MAC address of any device is hardwired into the device by its manufacturer, and is not publicly available.

  2. 2.

    Both source codes and results of all the models described in this work are available at http://homes.di.unimi.it/~pagae/ARPmodel/index.html.

  3. 3.

    It is worth to notice that the lack of this check allowed the MitM attack in RFC 826 against the victim itself.

  4. 4.

    Also \(p_m\), who may nondeterministically behave honestly.

References

  1. Abdulla, P.A., Delzanno, G., Henda, N.B., Rezine, A.: Regular model checking without transducers (on efficient verification of parameterized systems). In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 721–736. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71209-1_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdulla, P.A., Haziza, F., Holík, L.: All for the price of few. In: Giacobazzi, R., Berdine, J., Mastroeni, I. (eds.) VMCAI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7737, pp. 476–495. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35873-9_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdulla, P.A., Jonsson, B., Nilsson, M., Saksena, M.: A survey of regular model checking. In: Gardner, P., Yoshida, N. (eds.) CONCUR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3170, pp. 35–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28644-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alqahtani, A.H., Iftikhar, M.: TCP/IP attacks, defenses and security tools. Int. J. Sci. Mod. Eng. (IJISME) 1(10) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bardin, S., Finkel, A., Leroux, J., Schnoebelen, P.: Flat acceleration in symbolic model checking. In: Peled, D.A., Tsay, Y.-K. (eds.) ATVA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3707, pp. 474–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11562948_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellovin, S.M.: Security problems in the TCP/IP protocol suite. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 19(2), 32–48 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhargavan, K., Obradovic, D., Gunter, C.A.: Formal verification of standards for distance vector routing protocols. J. ACM 49(4), 538–576 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bloem, R., Jacobs, S., Khalimov, A., Konnov, I., Rubin, S., Veith, H., Widder, J.: Decidability of Parameterized Verification. Synthesis Lectures on Distributed Computing Theory. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bouajjani, A., Habermehl, P., Vojnar, T.: Abstract regular model checking. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 372–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27813-9_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheshire, S.: IPv4 Address Conflict Detection. RFC 5227, July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheshire, S., Aboba, B., Guttman, E.: Dynamic Configuration of IPv4 Link-Local Addresses. RFC 3927, May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conchon, S., Goel, A., Krstic, S., Mebsout, A., Zaïdi, F.: Invariants for finite instances and beyond. In: Proceedings of FMCAD (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conchon, S., Goel, A., Krstić, S., Mebsout, A., Zaïdi, F.: Cubicle: a parallel SMT-based model checker for parameterized systems. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) CAV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 718–724. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31424-7_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghilardi, S., Nicolini, E., Ranise, S., Zucchelli, D.: Towards SMT model checking of array-based systems. In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5195, pp. 67–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghilardi, S., Ranise, S.: MCMT: a model checker modulo theories. In: Giesl, J., Hähnle, R. (eds.) IJCAR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6173, pp. 22–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14203-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghilardi, S., Ranise, S.: Backward reachability of array-based systems by SMT solving: termination and invariant synthesis. J. Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 6(4) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Islam, S.M.S., Sqalli, M.S., Khan, S.: Modeling and formal verification of DHCP using SPIN. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 3(6), 145–159 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alford, M.W., Ansart, J.P., Hommel, G., Lamport, L., Liskov, B., Mullery, G.P., Schneider, F.B.: Formal foundation for specification and verification. In: Paul, M., et al. (eds.) Distributed Systems. LNCS, vol. 190, pp. 203–285. Springer, Heidelberg (1985). doi:10.1007/3-540-15216-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Plummer, D.C.: An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol - or - Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware. RFC 826, November 1982

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner, R.: Address Resolution Protocol Spoofing and Man-in-the-Middle Attacks. The SANS Institute, Reston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Pagani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bruschi, D., Di Pasquale, A., Ghilardi, S., Lanzi, A., Pagani, E. (2017). Formal Verification of ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) Through SMT-Based Model Checking - A Case Study -. In: Polikarpova, N., Schneider, S. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10510. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66845-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66845-1_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66844-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66845-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics