Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Clustering U.S. 2016 Presidential Candidates Through Linguistic Appraisals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017 (EUSFLAT 2017, IWIFSGN 2017)

Abstract

During electorate campaigns, linguistic appraisals of presidental candidates given by voters are essential. In order to deal with linguistic appraisals and cluster analysis, this paper presents the results of grouping the United States 2016 presidential candidates using linguistic appraisals collected from a political survey. To do this, we have developed an agglomerative hierarchical clustering procedure based on consensus through the concept of ordinal proximity measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The computations for obtaining the corresponding sequential consensus and similarity vectors have been performed with MATLAB.

References

  1. Aleskerov, F., Nurmi, H.: A method for finding patterns of party support and electoral change: an analysis of British general and Finnish municipal elections. Math. Comput. Modell., 1225–1269 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balinski, M., Laraki, R.: A theory of measuring, electing and ranking. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 8720–8725 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Balinski, M., Laraki, R.: Majority Judgment. Measuring, Ranking, and Electing. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowdle, A., Limbocker, S., Yang, S., Sebold, K., Stewart, P.: The Invisible Hands of Political Parties in Presidential Elections: Party Activists and Political Aggregation from 2004 to 2012. Palgrave Macmillan US (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M., Stahl, D.: Cluster Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Lapresta, J.L., González del Pozo, R., Pérez-Román, D.: Metrizable ordinal proximity measures and their aggregation (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  7. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: Consensus-based hierarchical agglomerative clustering in the context of weak orders. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IFSA-NAFIPS Joint Congress, Edmonton, pp. 1010–1015 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: Ordinal proximity measures in the context of unbalanced qualitative scales and some applications to consensus and clustering. Appl. Soft Comput. 35, 864–872 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: Consensus-based clustering under hesitant qualitative assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 292, 261–273 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: A consensus reaching process in the context of non-uniform ordered qualitative scales. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10700-016-9256-6

  11. Pearson, P.T., Cooper, C.I.: Using self organizing maps to analyze demographics and swing state voting in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7477. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org

  13. Seabrook, N.R.: The Obama effect: patterns of geographic clustering in the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections. Forum 7 (2009). doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1308

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Victoriano Ramírez for the information about the data source used in this paper. The financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (project ECO2016-77900-P) and ERDF are acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel González del Pozo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

González del Pozo, R., García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D. (2018). Clustering U.S. 2016 Presidential Candidates Through Linguistic Appraisals. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66824-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66824-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66823-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66824-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics