Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A New Reduced-Length Genetic Representation for Evolutionary Multiobjective Clustering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The last decade has seen a growing body of research illustrating the advantages of the evolutionary multiobjective approach to data clustering. The scalability of such an approach, however, is a topic which merits more attention given the unprecedented volumes of data generated nowadays. This paper proposes a reduced-length representation for evolutionary multiobjective clustering. The new encoding explicitly prunes the solution space and allows the search method to focus on its most promising regions. Moreover, it allows us to precompute information in order to alleviate the computational overhead caused by the processing of candidate individuals during optimisation. We investigate the suitability of this proposal in the context of a representative algorithm from the literature: MOCK. Our results indicate that the new reduced-length representation significantly improves the effectiveness and computational efficiency of MOCK specifically, and can be seen as a further step towards a better scalability of evolutionary multiobjective clustering in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Whereas the clustering phase is responsible for generating a PFA comprising high-quality partitions, the model-selection phase is concerned with selecting and reporting one (or more) candidate partition(s) from this PFA as the problem’s solution.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that changing the optimisation criteria is the only adaptation of MOCK required by the representation scheme proposed in this paper. Such an adaptation, however, is only intended to exploit the advantages that the new representation can provide in terms of computational efficiency; this change is not found to affect MOCK’s behaviour and performance as discussed at the end of Sect. 3.2.

  3. 3.

    Notice that when parameter \(\delta \) is set to \({\delta =0}\), the encoding scheme proposed here is equivalent to the original (full-length) locus-based adjacency representation.

  4. 4.

    Since the creation of new solutions relies mainly on recombination (due to the low mutation rates used), the genetic material introduced during initialisation plays a key role in delimiting the extent of the solution space that is reached by the method.

  5. 5.

    During the evolutionary process, the clusters defined by the partial solution are combined, which can only lead to the decrease of k and the increase of VAR.

References

  1. Chan, T., Golub, G., LeVeque, R.: Algorithms for computing the sample variance: analysis and recommendations. Am. Stat. 37(3), 242–247 (1983)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Corne, D.W., Jerram, N.R., Knowles, J.D., Oates, M.J.: PESA-II: region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 283–290. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grunert da Fonseca, V., Fonseca, C.M., Hall, A.O.: Inferential performance assessment of stochastic optimisers and the attainment function. In: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 213–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi:10.1007/3-540-44719-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., Vazirgiannis, M.: On clustering validation techniques. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 17(2), 107–145 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Handl, J., Knowles, J.: An evolutionary approach to multiobjective clustering. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(1), 56–76 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Handl, J., Knowles, J.: An investigation of representations and operators for evolutionary data clustering with a variable number of clusters. In: Runarsson, T.P., Beyer, H.-G., Burke, E., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Whitley, L.D., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4193, pp. 839–849. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11844297_85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hruschka, E.R., Campello, R.J.G.B., Freitas, A.A., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F.: A survey of evolutionary algorithms for clustering. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 39(2), 133–155 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishibuchi, H., Masuda, H., Tanigaki, Y., Nojima, Y.: Modified distance calculation in generational distance and inverted generational distance. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Henggeler Antunes, C., Coello, C.C. (eds.) EMO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9019, pp. 110–125. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, A.K.: Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 31(8), 651–666 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. López-Ibáñez, M., Paquete, L., Stützle, T.: Exploratory analysis of stochastic local search algorithms in biobjective optimization. In: Bartz-Beielstein, T., Chiarandini, M., Paquete, L., Preuss, M. (eds.) Experimental Methods for the Analysis of Optimization Algorithms, pp. 209–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 281–297. University of California Press, Berkeley (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mukhopadhyay, A., Maulik, U., Bandyopadhyay, S.: A survey of multiobjective evolutionary clustering. ACM Comput. Surv. 47(4), 61:1–61:46 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park, Y.J., Song, M.S.: A genetic algorithm for clustering problems. In: Genetic Programming, pp. 568–575. Morgan Kaufmann, Madison, July 1998

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66(336), 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothlauf, F., Goldberg, D.E.: Redundant representations in evolutionary computation. Evol. Comput. 11(4), 381–415 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Syswerda, G.: Uniform crossover in genetic algorithms. In: International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 2–9. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Grunert da Fonseca, V.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Garza-Fabre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garza-Fabre, M., Handl, J., Knowles, J. (2017). A New Reduced-Length Genetic Representation for Evolutionary Multiobjective Clustering. In: Trautmann, H., et al. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics