Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Using Demographics in Predicting Election Results with Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10047))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2747 Accesses

Abstract

The results of two Dutch elections are predicted by counting political party mentions from tweets. In an attempt to improve the predictions, gender and age information from the Twitter users is automatically derived and used to adapt the party counts to the demographics in the election turnout. The prediction improves only slightly in one of the elections where the correlation between election outcome and Twitter-based prediction was relatively lower to begin with (0.86 versus 0.97). The relatively inaccurate estimation of Twitter user age may hinder a larger improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://twitter.com.

  2. 2.

    In this study we only studied gender and age because these are the two most basic demographic data and because these are the only two that are automatically retrievable to a certain extent.

  3. 3.

    http://www.verkiezingsuitslagen.nl/Na1918/Verkiezingsuitslagen.aspx.

  4. 4.

    www.tns-nipo.com.

References

  1. Barberá, P., Rivero, G.: Understanding the political representativeness of twitter users. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 0894439314558836 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duggan, M., Brenner, J.: The demographics of social media users, vol. 14. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gayo-Avello, D.: A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(6), 649–679 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelman, A.: Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling. Stat. Sci. 22, 153–164 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Goerres, A.: Why are older people more likely to vote? The impact of ageing on electoral turnout in Europe. Br. J. Politics Int. Relat. 9(1), 90–121 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Inglehart, R., Norris, P.: The developmental theory of the gender gap: womens and mens voting behavior in global perspective. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 21(4), 441–463 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jungherr, A.: Predictor of electoral success and public opinion at large. In: Jungherr, A. (ed.) Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data: The Role of Twitter Messages in Social Science Research. Contributions to Political Science, pp. 189–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P., Schoen, H.: Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: a response to tumasjan, a., sprenger, to, sander, pg, & welpe, im predicting elections with twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30(2), 229–234 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mellon, J., Prosser, C.: Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: political attitudes and demographics of social media users. Available at SSRN (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.Y., Onnela, J.P., Rosenquist, J.N.: Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In: ICWSM 2011, p. 5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, D., Trieschnigg, D., Meder, T.: Tweetgenie: development, evaluation, and lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2014), pp. 62–66. Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2014. http://doc.utwente.nl/94056/

  12. Nguyen, D.P., Gravel, R., Trieschnigg, R., Meder, T.: How old do you think i am? A study of language and age in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanders, E., Van den Bosch, A.: Relating political party mentions on Twitter with polls and election results. In: Proceedings of DIR-2013, pp. 68–71 (2013). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-986/paper_9.pdf

  14. Tjong Kim Sang, E., Bos, J.: Predicting the 2011 Dutch senate election results with Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media, pp. 53–60. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tilley, J., Evans, G.: Ageing and generational effects on vote choice: combining cross-sectional and panel data to estimate APC effects. Electoral Stud. 33, 19–27 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tjong Kim Sang, E., Van den Bosch, A.: Dealing with big data: the case of Twitter. Comput. Linguist. Neth. J. 3, 121–134 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: ICWSM 2010, pp. 178–185 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verge Mestre, T., Tormos Marín, R.: The persistence of gender differences in political interest. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 138 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, W., Rothschild, D., Goel, S., Gelman, A.: Forecasting elections with non-representative polls. Int. J. Forecast. 31(3), 980–991 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Webster, S.W., Pierce, A.W.: Older, younger, or more similar? The use of age as a voting heuristic. Tech. rep., working paper (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dong Nguyen who provided the TweetGenie data, TNS-Nipo who provided the demographic data of the election turnout, Ruut Brandsma of allepeilingen.com for the polling information and Eline Pilaet, who did part of the demographic annotations of the political tweeters.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Sanders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sanders, E., de Gier, M., van den Bosch, A. (2016). Using Demographics in Predicting Election Results with Twitter. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, YY. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10047. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47873-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47874-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics