Abstract
Agile software development is characterized by very intensive communication and collaboration among members of the software development team and external stakeholders. In this context, we look specifically at cardwalls, noting that despite the wide availability of digital cardwalls, most Agile teams still use physical cardwalls to support their collaborative events. This is true even though a physical cardwall hinders efficient distributed software development and causes extra effort to capture story artefacts into digital tools to meet traceability and persistence requirements. We conducted two empirical studies in industry to understand the use of existing digital Agile cardwalls and to find out the needs for an ideal digital Agile cardwall. The first study was with eight Agile teams of committed digital cardwall users. The study showed the reasons why some teams use projected digital cardwalls and their detailed experiences with them. The study showed that most digital cardwalls seem not be sufficient for the highly interactive and collaborative Agile workstyle. The second study was with eleven Agile companies. The study comprised of the development of aWall, a software prototype of a large interactive high-resolution multi-touch display that supports varied Agile meetings where cardwalls are used. The results of the study emerged with design considerations for digital Agile cardwalls from the evaluation of aWall in a user workshop. Both studies, which were conducted concurrently, began with an interest in new large interactive surface technologies which might have the potential to provide not only the required interaction possibilities to support intensive collaboration, but also the required large display format necessary for a collaborative space. The results of the studies collectively seem to confirm our assumption, that large interactive surface technologies could bring the support for the collaboration of Agile teams to a new level, potentially making the teams more productive.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
All quotes have been translated from German.
References
Agile Manifesto. Web, March 2016. http://agilemanifesto.org/
Kropp M, Meier A, Biddle R (2016) Agile adolescence to maturity: experience leads to collaboration. Presented at OOP Conference, Munich, 2016
Whitworth E, Biddle R (2007) The social nature of agile teams. In: Proceedings of the Agile software development conference, Washington D.C. IEEE
Azizyan G, Magarian MK, Kajko-Matsson M (2011) Survey of Agile tool usage and needs. In: Agile conference (AGILE), 2011, pp 29–38
Sharp H, Robinson H, Petre M (2009) The role of physical artefacts in agile software development. Interdisc J Human-Comput Interac 21(1–2)
Thomas RG (1996) Green and Marian Petre. Usability analysis of visual programming environments: A ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. J Visual Lang Comput 7(2):131–174
Cockburn A (2006) Agile software development: the cooperative game, second edition. Addison-Wesley Professional
Beck K (1999) Extreme programming explained. Addison-Wesley Professional
Fog Creek Software (2016) Trello. Web, Feb 2016. http://trello.com/
Atlassian (2016) JIRA. Web, Feb 2016. http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Wang X (2009) Using digital tabletops to support agile project planning. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 2009
Weber S, Ghanam Y, Wang X, Maurer F (2008) Apdt- an agile planning tool for digital tabletops. In: Proceedings 9th international conference on agile processes and eXtreme programming in software engineering (XP2008)
Morgan RE (2008) Distributed agile planner: a card-based planning environment for agile teams. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science, 2008
Smart Technologies (2010) Digital vision touch. http://www.smarttech.com/
Schöning J, Brandl P, Daiber F, Echtler F, Hilliges O, Hook J, Lchtefeld M, Motamedi N, Muller L, Olivier P, Roth T, von Zadow U (2008) Multi-touch surfaces: a technical guide. Technical Report TUM-I0833, University of Munster, 2008
Gossage Stevenson (2010) CMAP: a collaborative multitouch Agile planner. University of Carleton, School of Computer Science, Honours project
Scott SD, Grant KD, Mandryk RL (2003) System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on european conference on computer supported cooperative work, ECSCW’03, Norwell, MA, USA, 2003. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 159–178
PyMt.eu. PyMt, Multitouch Framework. http://pymt.eu, December 2010
Esbensen M, Tell P, Cholewa JB, Pedersen MK, Bardram J (2015) The dboard: a digital scrum board for distributed software development. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS). ACM, pp 161–170
Anslow C, Marshall S, Noble J, Biddle R (2013) SourceVis: collaborative software visualization for co-located environments. In: Proceedings of the international working conference on software visualization (VISSOFT). IEEE
Bragdon A, DeLine R, Hinckley K, Morris MR (2011) Code space: touch+air gesture hybrid interactions for supporting developer meetings. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS). ACM, pp 212–221
Gossage S, Brown JM, Biddle R (2015) Understanding digital cardwall usage. In: Agile conference (AGILE), 2015. IEEE, pp 21–30
Bernard HR (2011) Research methods in anthropology. AltaMira Press
Lofland J (2006) Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis, chapter 5. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 4th edition, pp 81–116
Sanjek Roger (1990) Fieldnotes: the makings of anthropology. J Hist Behav Sci 28(3):274–276
Fontana A, Frey JH (1994) Interviewing: the art of science. SAGE Publications, pp 361–376
Rubin HJ, Rubin I (1995) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, chapter 5. Sage Publications, pp 93–121
Smith JA (1995) Rethinking methods in psychology, chapter 2. Thousand Oaks, pp 9–26
Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications
Gubrium JF, Sankar A (1994) Qualitative methods in aging research, vol 168, chapter 12. SAGE Publications, pp 189–210
De Almeida RA, Pillias C, Pietriga E, Cubaud P (2012) Looking behind bezels: French windows for wall displays. In: Proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI ’12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM, pp 124–131
Endert A, Bradel L, Zeitz J, Andrews C, North C (2012) Designing large high-resolution display workspaces. In: Proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI ’12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM, pp 58–65
Jagodic R (2011) Collaborative interaction and display space organization in large high-resolution environments. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011. AAI3551257
Jagodic Ratko, Renambot Luc, Johnson Andrew, Leigh Jason, Deshpande Sachin (2011) Enabling multi-user interaction in large high-resolution distributed environments. Future Gener Comput Syst 27(7):914–923 July
Jakobsen MR, Haile YS, Knudsen S, Hornbæk K (2013) Information visualization and proxemics: design opportunities and empirical findings. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19(12):2386–2395
Yost Beth, North Chris (2006) The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 12(5):837–844 Sept
Shneiderman B (1996) The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages, VL ’96, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society, p 336
Mateescu M, Kropp M, Greiwe S, Burkhard R, Vischi D, Zahn C (2015) Erfolgreiche zusammenarbeit in agilen teams: Eine schweizer interview-studie ber kommunikation, 22 Dec 2015. http://www.swissagilestudy.ch/studies
Mateescu M, Kropp M, Burkhard R, Zahn C, Vischier D (2015) awall: a socio-cognitive tool for agile team collaboration using large multi-touch wall systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS). ACM, pp 361–366
Beck Kent, Cunningham Ward (1989) A laboratory for teaching object oriented thinking. ACM Sigplan Notices 24(10):1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kropp, M., Brown, J.M., Anslow, C., Gossage, S., Mateescu, M., Biddle, R. (2016). Interactive Digital Cardwalls for Agile Software Development. In: Anslow, C., Campos, P., Jorge, J. (eds) Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45853-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45853-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45852-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45853-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)