Abstract
The generic software development situational factors model has been developed in order that environments within which software is developed can be profiled and better understood. Situational context is a complex concern for software developers, with a broad set of situational factors holding the potential to affect any one software development project. Safety critical software development is broadly similar to other kinds of software development/ engineering. But there are some additional or more dominant situational factors. In this article we conduct a conceptual experiment to define safety critical software development context using situational factors. Eleven such factors are identified, with some of the factors requiring elaboration beyond the detail presently available in the generic situational factors model. We firstly discuss the appropriateness of the selected factors in generic safety critical software development context. Thereafter we apply the selected factors to the medical device and nuclear power domains. Selected situational factors can be used as a high level profile and starting point for more detailed process and safety assessment. Discussion about potential use cases and further development needs is also presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Such “generic safety critical software” may not exist, because most industry sectors use their own standards. Note also that terminology may vary in standards, for example “safety-related software” or “software important for safety”.
References
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Leavy, B.: A Complexity theory viewpoint on the software development process and situational context. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP 2016). IEEE, San Francisco (2016)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: towards a comprehensive reference framework. J. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(5), 433–447 (2012)
Knight, J.C.: Safety critical systems: challenges and directions. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 547–550. IEEE (2002)
Manson, S.M.: Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32(3), 405–414 (2001)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R., Leavy, B., Yilmaz, M.: Exploring the relationship between software process adaptive capability and organisational performance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 41(12), 1169–1183 (2015)
Clarke, P., Lepmets, M., McCaffery, F., Finnegan, A., Dorling, A., Eagles, S.: Characteristics of a medical device software development framework. In: Industrial Proceedings of EuroSPI 2014 conference, pp. 1–9 (2014)
IEC: IEC 62304 medical device software - software life-cycle processes. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)
Clarke, P., Lepmets, M., Dorling, A., McCaffery, F.: Safety critical software process assessment: how MDevSPICE® addresses the challenge of integrating compliance and capability. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2015. CCIS, vol. 526, pp. 13–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
Varkoi, T., Nevalainen, R.: FiSMA report 2014-2. Advanced nuclear SPICE assessment process. Version 1.0, 2015-01-08. SAFIR2014. FiSMA, Espoo Finland (2015)
IEC: IEC 61508, functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety related systems. Parts 1 – 7. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2010)
ISO: ISO 14971 - medical devices - application of risk management to medical devices. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)
IEC: IEC 60601-1 - medical electrical equipment – part 1: general requirements for basic safety and essential performance. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2005)
BEL-V, BfS, CNSC: Common positio006E. Licensing of safety critical software for nuclear reactors. Common position of seven European nuclear regulators and authorised technical support organisations. Regulator Task Force on Safety Critical Software (TF SCS) (2013)
IEC: IEC 60880, nuclear power plants – instrumentation and control systems important to safety – software aspects for computer-based systems performing category A functions. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)
IEC: IEC 62138, nuclear power plants – I&C systems important to safety – software aspects for computer based systems performing category B and C functions. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2004)
IEC: IEC 61513, nuclear power plants – instrumentation and control for systems important to safety – general requirements for systems. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2001)
IEC: IEC 61226, nuclear power plants – instrumentation and control systems important for safety – classification of instrumentation and control functions. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)
Clarke, P., Elger, P., O’Connor, R.V.: Technology enabled continuous software development. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery (CSED). ACM / IEEE, New York (2016)
Acknowledgments
This research is supported in part by the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centres Programme, through Lero - the Irish Software Research Centre (http://www.lero.ie) grant 10/CE/I1855 & 13/RC/20194; and in part by the Finnish national nuclear safety program SAFIR2018 (http://safir2018.vtt.fi/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nevalainen, R., Clarke, P., McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Varkoi, T. (2016). Situational Factors in Safety Critical Software Development. In: Kreiner, C., O'Connor, R., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 633. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44816-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44817-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)