Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Study of Archiving Strategies in Multi-objective PSO for Molecular Docking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Swarm Intelligence (ANTS 2016)

Abstract

Molecular docking is a complex optimization problem aimed at predicting the position of a ligand molecule in the active site of a receptor with the lowest binding energy. This problem can be formulated as a bi-objective optimization problem by minimizing the binding energy and the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) difference in the coordinates of ligands. In this context, the SMPSO multi-objective swarm-intelligence algorithm has shown a remarkable performance. SMPSO is characterized by having an external archive used to store the non-dominated solutions and also as the basis of the leader selection strategy. In this paper, we analyze several SMPSO variants based on different archiving strategies in the scope of a benchmark of molecular docking instances. Our study reveals that the SMPSOhv, which uses an hypervolume contribution based archive, shows the overall best performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In URL: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do.

  2. 2.

    In URL: http://research.cs.wisc.edu/htcondor/.

References

  1. Coello, C.A., Toscano, G., Lechuga, M.S.: Handling Multiple objectives with Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 8(3), 3 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durillo, J.J., García-Nieto, J., Nebro, A.J., Coello, C.A.C., Luna, F., Alba, E.: Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: an experimental comparison. In: Ehrgott, M., Fonseca, C.M., Gandibleux, X., Hao, J.-K., Sevaux, M. (eds.) EMO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5467, pp. 495–509. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. García-Godoy, M.J., López-Camacho, E., García Nieto, J., Nebro, A.J., Aldana-Montes, J.F.: Solving molecular docking problems with multi-objective metaheuristics. Molecules 20(6), 10154–10183 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu, J., Yang, X., Kang, L., Wu, J., Wang, X.: MoDock: a multi-objective strategy improves the accuracy for molecular docking. Algs. Mol. Bio. 10, 8 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Janson, S., Merkle, D., Middendorf, M.: Molecular docking with multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 8(1), 666–675 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. López-Camacho, E., García-Godoy, M.J., Nebro, A.J., Aldana-Montes, J.F.: jMetalCpp: optimizing molecular docking problems with a C++ metaheuristic framework. Bioinformatics 30(3), 437–438 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. López-Camacho, E., García-Godoy, M.J., García-Nieto, J., Nebro, A.J., Aldana-Montes, J.F.: Solving molecular flexible docking problems with metaheuristics: a comparative study. Appl. Soft Comput. 28, 379–393 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. López-Camacho, E., García-Godoy, M.J., García-Nieto, J., Nebro, A.J., Aldana-Montes, J.F.: A new multi-objective approach for molecular docking based on RMSD and binding energy. In: 3rd International Conference on Algorithm for Computational Biology (2016, in-Press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris, G.M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M.F., Belew, R.K., Goodsell, D.S., Olson, A.J.: AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30(16), 2785–2791 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nebro, A., Durillo, J., Garcia-Nieto, J., Coello Coello, C.A., Luna, F., Alba, E.: SMPSO: a new PSO-based metaheuristic for multi-objective optimization. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-criteria Decision-Making, pp. 66–73 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nebro, A., Durillo, J., Coello Coello, C.A.: Analysis of leader selection strategies in a MOPSO. In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 3153–3160, June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norgan, A.P., Coffman, P.K., Kocher, J.P.A., Katzmann, D.J., Sosa, C.P.: Multilevel parallelization of AutoDock 4.2. J. Cheminform. 3(1), 12 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sierra, M.R., Coello Coello, C.A.: Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and \(\epsilon \)-dominance. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 505–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandoval-Perez, A., Becerra, D., Vanegas, D., Restrepo-Montoya, D., Nino, F.: A multi-objective optimization energy approach to predict the ligand conformation in a docking process. In: Krawiec, K., Moraglio, A., Hu, T., Etaner-Uyar, A.Ş., Hu, B. (eds.) EuroGP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7831, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheskin, D.J.: Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 3(4), 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., da Fonseca, V.G.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially funded by Grants TIN2011-25840 (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación) and P11-TIC-7529 and P12-TIC-1519 (Plan Andaluz I+D+I). This article is based upon work from COST Action CA15140, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to José García-Nieto , Esteban López-Camacho , María Jesús García Godoy , Antonio J. Nebro , Juan J. Durillo or José F. Aldana-Montes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

García-Nieto, J., López-Camacho, E., Godoy, M.J.G., Nebro, A.J., Durillo, J.J., Aldana-Montes, J.F. (2016). A Study of Archiving Strategies in Multi-objective PSO for Molecular Docking. In: Dorigo, M., et al. Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44426-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44427-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics