Abstract
Government Process Capability Determination Model is developed based on ISO/IEC 15504 by the authors in order to assess the extent of the processes to be consistently applied, managed, and controlled across governmental agencies. Government Process Reference Model consists of definitions of common processes across all governmental agencies as well as a generic process definition for agency-specific governmental processes. This study covers the development of the generic process definition in detail. AWL introduced by Medina-Mora is taken as a starting point to develop the generic process definition. A capability dimension based on the capability dimension of 15504-2 is defined. The outcomes and BPs described are, however, considered to be the minimum necessary to meet ISO/IEC 15504 requirements. In order to explore the applicability of the proposed definition, case studies are conducted. Public investment management process definition, ad-hoc defined beforehand, compared to the generic process definition. Moreover, The Graduate Student Selection process performed in METU is assessed and capability level of the process is determined; correspondingly, a roadmap to improve process capability level is derived. The findings of the study indicate the usefulness and adequacy of the proposed approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Teicher, J., Hughes, O., Dow, N.: E-government: a new route to public sector quality. Manag. Serv. Q. Int. J. 12(6), 384–393 (2002)
Hutton, G.: Business process re-engineering–a public sector view. In: Armistead, C., Rowland, P. (eds.) Managing Business Processes–BPR and Beyond. Wiley, Chichester (1996)
Acar, M., Kumaş, E.: Türkiye’nin Dönüşüm Sürecinde Anahtar Bir Mekanizma Olarak e-devlet, e-dönüşüm ve Entegrasyon Standartları. 2. In: National Economoy Symposium (2008)
Stemberger, M.I., Jaklic, J.: Towards E-government by business process change—a methodology for public sector. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 27(4), 221–232 (2007)
Isomäki, H., Liimatainen, K.: Challenges of government enterprise architecture work – stakeholders’ views. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Ferro, E. (eds.) EGOV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5184, pp. 364–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Hjort-Madsen, K., Gøtze, J.: Enterprise architecture in government-towards a multi-level framework for managing IT in government. In: 4th European Conference on e-Government, Dublin Castle, Ireland, pp. 365–374 (2004)
Fong, E.N., Goldfine, A.H.: Information management directions: the integration challenge. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 18(4), 40–43 (1989)
ISO: ISO/IEC 15504-2: Information technology - Process assessment - Part 2: Performing an assessment (2003)
ISO: ISO/IEC 15504-3: Information technology – Process assessment – Part 3: Guidance on performing an assessment (2004)
ISO: ISO/IEC 15504-4: Information technology – Process assessment – Part 4: Guidance on use for process improvement and process capability determination (2004)
ISO: ISO/IEC 15504-5: Information technology - Process assessment - Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model (2012)
Software Engineering Institute (SEI): CMMI Product Team, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3, Improving processes for developing better products and services (2010)
ISO/IEC 33000 – Information Technology – Process Assessment, International Organization for Standardization (2014)
Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE - Process Assessment Model (2007). http://www.itq.ch/pdf/AutomotiveSPICE_PAM_v23.pdf
Mc Caffery, F., Dorling, A.: Medi SPICE development. J. Softw. Maintenance Evol. Res. Pract. 22(4), 255–268 (2010)
Ibrahim, L.: Improving process capability across your enterprise. In: 4th World Congress on Software Quality (4WCSQ), Bethesda, USA (2008)
Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O.: Government process capability model: an exploratory case study. In: Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2014. CCIS, vol. 477, pp. 94–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O.: Proposing an ISO/IEC 15504 based process improvement method for the government domain. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2015. CCIS, vol. 526, pp. 100–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
CIO Council: Federal Enterprise Architecture Consolidated Reference Model Document. Version 2.3 (2007)
American Productivity & Quality Center (APQC), Process Classification Framework, APQC, Washington, DC (2012). http://www.apqc.org/free/framework.htm
CP Team: CMMI for Service, Version 1.2. CMMI-SVC v1. 2. Technical report, CMU/SEI-2009-TR-001, Software Engineering Institute (2009)
Curtis, B., Hefley, B., Miller, S.: People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0. No. CMU/SEI-2009-TR-003 (2009)
Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., Flores, F.: The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. In: ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 281–288. ACM (1992)
Balzer, W.K.: Lean Higher Education: Increasing the Value and Performance of University Processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)
Gokalp, E.: Technical Report of Graduate Student Selection Process Assessment (2016). http://smrg.ii.metu.edu.tr/smrgp/index.php?option=com_jresearch&view=publication&task=show&id=740&Itemid=54
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O. (2016). Towards a Process Capability Assessment Model for Government Domain. In: Clarke, P., O'Connor, R., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 609. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38979-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38980-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)