Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Study of Web Application Firewall Solutions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Security (ICISS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 9478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Web application firewalls (WAFs) are the primary front-end protection mechanism for Internet-based infrastructure which is constantly under attack. This paper therefore aims to provide more insights into the performance of the most popular open-source WAFs, including ModSecurity, WebKnight, and Guardian, which we hope will complement existing knowledge. The key contribution of this work is an in-depth approach for conducting such a study. Specifically, we combine three testing frameworks: the Imperva’s proprietary benchmark, a generic benchmark using both FuzzDB and Burp test-beds, and testing for common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVE) known exploits. Our experiments show that open source WAFs are not yet totally reliable for protecting web applications despite many advances in the field. ModSecurity appears to be the most balanced open-source solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guardian. http://guardian.jumperz.net/index.html

  2. ModSecurity. https://www.modsecurity.org/

  3. Web Knight. https://www.aqtronix.com/?PageID=99

  4. Balock, R., Jaffery, T.: Modern Web Application Firewalls Fingerprinting and Bypassing XSS Filters. Technical report, Rhainfosec (2013), White Paper

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bau, J., Bursztein, E., Gupta, D., Mitchell, J.: State of the art: automated black-box web application vulnerability testing. In: 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 332–345. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becher, M.: Web Application Firewalls. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bojinov, H., Bursztein, E., Boneh, D.: Xcs: cross channel scripting and its impact on web applications. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 420–431. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cabrera, H., Krstic, G., Petrushevski, S.: CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Round 2. Technical report, Zero Science Lab (2013). http://zeroscience.mk/files/wafreport2013v2.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2015

  9. Doupé, A., Cova, M., Vigna, G.: Why Johnny can’t pentest: an analysis of black-box web vulnerability scanners. In: Kreibich, C., Jahnke, M. (eds.) DIMVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6201, pp. 111–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, Y.W., Yu, F., Hang, C., Tsai, C.H., Lee, D.T., Kuo, S.Y.: Securing web application code by static analysis and runtime protection. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 40–52. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jovanovic, N., Kruegel, C., Kirda, E.: Pixy: a static analysis tool for detecting web application vulnerabilities. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen-Tuong, A., Guarnieri, S., Greene, D., Shirley, J., Evans, D.: Automatically hardening web applications using precise tainting. In: Sasaki, R., Qing, S., Okamoto, E., Yoshiura, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th IFIP International Information Security Conference, vol. 181, pp. 295–307. Springer, US (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tibom, P.: Incapsula vs. CloudFlare: Security Review & Comparison. Technical report, Personal Review (2012). https://www.computerscience.se/downloads/Full-Review.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2015

  14. Torrano-Gimenez, C., Perez-Villegas, A., Alvarez, G.: A self-learning anomaly-based web application firewall. In: Herrero, Á., Gastaldo, P., Zunino, R., Corchado, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems, vol. 63, pp. 85–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Vernotte, A., Dadeau, F., Lebeau, F., Legeard, B., Peureux, F., Piat, F.: Efficient detection of multi-step cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. In: Prakash, A., Shyamasundar, R. (eds.) ICISS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8880, pp. 358–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duc-Son Pham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prandl, S., Lazarescu, M., Pham, DS. (2015). A Study of Web Application Firewall Solutions. In: Jajoda, S., Mazumdar, C. (eds) Information Systems Security. ICISS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9478. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26961-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26961-0_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26960-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26961-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics