Abstract
As robots become more integrated into society and the workforce, people will be required to work cooperatively with not just other people, but robots as well. People engage in team-building activities to improve cooperation and promote positive group identity. This paper explores the effect that a team-building activity had on humans working cooperatively with human and robot teammates with the goal of better understanding how to improve cooperation between a human and a robotic agent. We conducted a 2x2 study with the presence or absence of a team-building activity and the possibility or impossibility of the cooperative task. 40 participants conducted a group search task with a robot and another human partner. Half of the participants engaged in a short team-building exercise. Surveys were used to capture participants’ perceptions before and after the session. Success and failure of the task was also measured to identify any changes related to the outcome of the team-building task. It was found that humans’ perceptions of robots improve after performing team-building activities. We also found that this effect was comparable to the change of perception when the group succeeded on the task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(1), 71–81 (2009)
Brown, G., Crossley, C., Robinson, S.L.: Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology 67(2), 463–485 (2014)
Dyer, W.G., Dyer, J., Dyer, J.H.: Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. John Wiley & Sons (2010)
Feil-Seifer, D.J., Matarić, M.J.: Distance-based computational models for facilitating robot interaction with children. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1(1), 55–77 (2012). doi:10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Feil-Seifer
Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Collaboration, dialogue, and human-robot interaction. In: Jarvis, R.A., Zelinsky, A. (eds.) Robotics Research. STAR, vol. 6, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Jung, M.F., Martelaro, N., Hinds, P.J.: Using robots to moderate team conflict: the case of repairing violations. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 229–236. ACM (2015)
Kanda, T., Shiomi, M., Miyashita, Z., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: An affective guide robot in a shopping mall. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 173–180. ACM (2009)
McCallum, L., McOwan, P.W.: Face the music and glance: How nonverbal behaviour aids human robot relationships based in music. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 237–244 (2015)
Miller, B.C.: Quick activities to improve your team: How to run a successful team-building activity. Journal for Quality and Participation 30(3), (2007)
Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J.: Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 287–294. ACM, New York/Amsterdam, March 2008
Nagavalli, S., Chien, S.Y., Lewis, M., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K.: Bounds of neglect benevolence in input timing for human interaction with robotic swarms. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 197–204. ACM (2015)
Newell, S., David, G., Chand, D.: An analysis of trust among globally distributed work teams in an organizational setting. Knowledge and Process Management 14(3), 158–168 (2007)
Nikolaidis, S., Ramakrishnan, R., Gu, K., Shah, J.: Efficient model learning from joint-action demonstrations for human-robot collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 189–196 (2015)
Ponda, S., Choi, H.L., How, J.P.: Predictive planning for heterogeneous human-robot teams. AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace (2010)
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
Rivas, O., Jones, I.S.: Leadership: building a team using structured activities
Unhelkar, V.V., Siu, H.C., Shah, J.A.: Comparative performance of human and mobile robotic assistants in collaborative fetch-and-deliver tasks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 82–89 (2014)
Xu, A., Dudek, G.: Optimo: Online probabilistic trust inference model for asymmetric human-robot collaborations. In: ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on HRI (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carlson, Z., Sweet, T., Rhizor, J., Poston, J., Lucas, H., Feil-Seifer, D. (2015). Team-Building Activities for Heterogeneous Groups of Humans and Robots. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25553-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25554-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)