Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Optimization of a Simulation for Inhomogeneous Mineral Subsoil Machining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analysis of Large and Complex Data

Abstract

For the new generation of concrete which enables more stable constructions, we require more efficient tools. Since the preferred tool for machining concrete is a diamond impregnated drill with substantial initial investment costs, the reduction of tool wear is of special interest. The stochastic character of the diamond size, orientation, and position in sintered segments, as well as differences in the machined material, justifies the development of a statistically motivated simulation. In the simulations presented in the past, workpiece and tool are subdivided by Delaunay tessellations into predefined fragments. The heterogeneous nature of the ingredients of concrete is solved by Gaussian random fields. Before proceeding with the simulation of the whole drill core bit, we have to adjust the simulation parameters for the two main components of the drill, diamond and metal matrix, by minimizing the discrepancy between simulation results and the conducted experiments. Due to the fact that our simulation is an expensive black box function with stochastic outcome, we use the advantages of model based optimization methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ankenman, B., Nelson, B. L., & Staum, J. (2010). Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Operations Research, 58(2), 371–382.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bischl, B., Bossek, J., Richter, J., Horn, D., & Lang, M. (2013). mlrMBO: mlr: Model-based optimization. R package version 1.0, https://github.com/berndbischl/mlr

  • Ding, H., Trajcevski, G., Scheuermann, P., Wang, X., & Keogh, E. (2008). Querying and mining of time series data: Experimental comparison of representations and distance measures. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 1 (2), August 23–28, 2008, Auckland (pp. 1542–1552).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgino, T. (2009). Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: The dtw package. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(7), 1–24. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v31/i07/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 21(4), 345–383.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2007). Dynamic time warping. In Information retrieval for music and motion (pp. 69–84). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Picheny, V., Wagner, T., & Ginsbourger, D. (2013). A benchmark of kriging-based infill criteria for noisy optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(3), 607–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, N., Rautert, C., Ferreira, M., & Weihs, C. (2011). Geometrical process modeling and simulation of concrete machining based on Delaunay tessellations. In S. I. Ao, C. L. Douglas, W. S. Grundfest & J. Burgstone (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2011 (WCECS’11), October 19–21, 2011. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science (Vol. II, pp. 991–996). San Francisco: International Association of Engineers, Newswood Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, N., Thieler, A. M., Weihs, C., Fried, R., Rautert, C., & Biermann, D. (2012). Modeling material heterogeneity by Gaussian random fields for the simulation of inhomogeneous mineral subsoil machining. In P. Dini, P. Lorenz (Eds.), SIMUL 2012: The Fourth International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, November 18–23, 2012, Lisbon (pp. 97–102).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlather, M., Malinowski, A., Oesting, M., Boecker, D., Strokorb, K., Engelke, S., et al. (2014). RandomFields: Simulation Simulation and analysis of random fields. R package version 3.0.10, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RandomFields

  • Weihs, C., Raabe, N., Ferreira, M., & Rautert, C. (2014). Statistical process modelling for machining of inhomogeneous mineral subsoil. In German-Japanese interchange of data analysis results (pp. 253–263). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Collaborative Research Center “Statistical modeling of nonlinear dynamic processes” (SFB 823) of the German Research Foundation (DFG)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Swetlana Herbrandt or Claus Weihs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herbrandt, S. et al. (2016). Optimization of a Simulation for Inhomogeneous Mineral Subsoil Machining. In: Wilhelm, A., Kestler, H. (eds) Analysis of Large and Complex Data. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25226-1_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics