Building a High Performance End-to-End Explicit Discourse Parser for Practical Application

1. Verberne, S., Boves, L., Oostdijk, N., Coppen, P.-A.: Evaluating discourse-based answer extraction for why-question answering. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 735–736. ACM (2007)

   Google Scholar 

2. Cimiano, P., Reyle, U., Šarić, J.: Ontology-driven discourse analysis for information extraction. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55(1), 59–83 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A.K., Webber, B.L.: The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. In LREC. Citeseer (2008)

   Google Scholar 

4. Ghosh, S., Johansson, R., Riccardi, G.,, Tonelli, S.: Shallow discourse parsing with conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp. 1071–1079. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, November 2011

   Google Scholar 

5. Kong, F., Ng, H.T., Zhou, G.: A constituent-based approach to argument labeling with joint inference in discourse parsing. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, pp. 68–77. Association for Computational Linguistics, October 2014

   Google Scholar 

6. Lin, Z., Kan, M.-Y., Ng, H.T.: Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the penn discourse Treebank. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore, pp. 343–351. Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2009

   Google Scholar 

7. Pitler, E., Louis, A., Nenkova, A.: Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Suntec, Singapore, pp. 683–691. Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2009

   Google Scholar 

8. Pitler, E., Nenkova, A.: Using syntax to disambiguate explicit discourse connectives in text. In: Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pp. 13–16. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

   Google Scholar 

9. Rutherford, A.T., Xue, N.: Discovering implicit discourse relations through brown cluster pair representation and coreference patterns. In: EACL 2014, p. 645 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

10. Lin, Z., Ng, H.T., Kan, M.-Y.: A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser. Natural Language Engineering, 1–34 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

11. Lan, M., Xu, Y., Niu, Z.-Y., et al.: Leveraging synthetic discourse data via multi-task learning for implicit discourse relation recognition. In: ACL, no. 1, pp. 476–485. Citeseer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

12. Knott, A.: A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references