Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A New Approach to the Rule-Base Evidential Reasoning with Application

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9119))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2053 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, a new approach to the rule-base evidential reasoning (RBER) based on a new formulation of fuzzy rules is presented. We have shown that the traditional fuzzy logic rules lose an important information when dealing with the intersecting fuzzy classes, e.g., such as Low and Medium, and this property may lead to the controversial results. In the framework of our approach, an information of the values of all membership functions representing the intersecting (competing) fuzzy classes is preserved and used in the fuzzy logic rules. As RBER methods are based on the synthesis of fuzzy logic and the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence (DST), the problem of the combination of basic probability assignments (bpas) from different sources of evidence arises. The classical Dempster’s rule of combination is usually used for this purpose. The classical Dempster’s rule may provide controversial results in the case of great conflict and is not idempotent one. We show that the Dempster’s rule may provide unreasonable results not only in the case of large conflict, but in the case of complete absence of conflict, too. At the end, we show that in the cases of small and large conflict, the use of simple averaging rule for combination of bpas seems to be a best choice. The developed approach is illustrated by the solution of simple, but real-world problem of diagnostics of type 2 diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delmotte, F., Dubois, L., Desodt, A., Borne, P.: Using trust in uncertainty theories. Information and Systems Engineering 1, 303–314 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a muilti-valued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A Set-Theoretic View on Belief Functions: Logical Operations and Approximations by Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of General Systems 12, 193–226 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Computational Intelligence 4, 244–264 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On the combination of evidence in various mathematical frameworks. In: Aamm, J., Luisi, T. (eds.) Reliability Data Collection and Analysis, pp. 213–241 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dymova, L., Sevastianov, P., Bartosiewicz, P.: A new approach to the rule-base evidential reasoning: Stock trading expert system application. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 5564–5576 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dymova, L., Sevastianov, P., Kaczmarek, K.: A stock trading expert system based on the rule-base evidential reasoning using Level 2 Quotes. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 7150–7157 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., Tkacz, K., Cheherava, T.: A new measure of conflict and hybrid combination rules in the evidence theory. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8468, pp. 411–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Florea, M.C., Dezert, J., Valin, P., Smarandache, F., Jousselme, A.L.: Adaptative combination rule and proportional conflict redistribution rule for information fusion. Presented at the Conference “Cognitive Systems with Interactive Sensors”, Paris (2006), arXiv:cs/0604042v1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Florea, M.C., Jousselme, A.-L., Bossé, É., Grenier, D.: Robust combination rules for evidence theory. Information Fusion 10, 183–197 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horiuchi, T.: Decision Rule for Pattern Classification by Integrating Interval Feature Values. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 440–448 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Inagaki, T.: Interdependence between Safety-Control Policy and Multiple-Sensor Schemes Via Dempster-Shafer Theory. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 40, 182–188 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Josang, A., Daniel, M., Vannoorenberghe, P.: Strategies for Combining Conflicting Dogmatic Beliefs. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on International Fusion, vol. 2, pp. 1133–1140 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, A., Osswald, C.H., Dezert, J., Smarandache, F.: General Combination Rules for Qualitative and Quantitative Beliefs. Journal of Advances in Information Fusion 3, 67–89 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuyama, T.: Belief Formation From Observation and Belief Integration Using Virtual Belief Space in Dempster-Shafer Probability Model. In: Proc. Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI 1994), pp. 379–386 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy, C.K.: Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts. Decision Support Systems 29, 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sentz, K., Ferson, S.: Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory. Sandia National Laboratories SAND 2002-0835 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sevastianov, P., Dymova, L.: Synthesis of fuzzy logic and Dempster-Shafer Theory for the simulation of the decision-making process in stock trading systems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 80, 506–521 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevastianov, P., Dymova, L., Bartosiewicz, P.: A framework for rule-base evidential reasoning in the interval setting applied to diagnosing type 2 diabetes. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 4190–4200 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smarandache, F.: An In-Depth Look at Information Fusion Rules and the Unification of Fusion Theories, Computing Research Repository (CoRR), Cornell University arXiv, vol. cs.OH/0410033 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smarandache, F.: Unification of Fusion Theories (UFT), May 16-27. NATO Advanced Study Institute, Albena (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Smets, P.: The alpha-junctions: combination operators applicable to belief functions. LNCS, vol. 1244, pp. 131–153. Springer (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zadeh, L.A.: Review of Books: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. The AI Magazine 5, 81–83 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zadeh, L.: A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its application for the rule of combination. AI Magazine 7, 85–90 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Sevastjanov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sevastjanov, P., Dymova, L., Kaczmarek, K. (2015). A New Approach to the Rule-Base Evidential Reasoning with Application. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L., Zurada, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9119. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19324-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19324-3_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19323-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19324-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics