Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Abstract

SCEL (Service Component Ensemble Language) is a new language specifically designed to rigorously model and program autonomic components and their interaction, while supporting formal reasoning on their behaviors. SCEL brings together various programming abstractions that allow one to directly represent aggregations, behaviors and knowledge according to specific policies. It also naturally supports programming interaction, self-awareness, context-awareness, and adaptation. The solid semantic grounds of the language is exploited for developing logics, tools and methodologies for formal reasoning on system behavior to establish qualitative and quantitative properties of both the individual components and the overall systems.

This research was supported by the European project IP 257414 (ASCENS) and by the Italian PRIN 2010LHT4KM CINA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 15.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 15.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abeywickrama, D.B., Combaz, J., Horký, V., Keznikl, J., Kofroň, J., Lafuente, A.L., Loreti, M., Margheri, A., Mayer, P., Monreale, V., Montanari, U., Pinciroli, C., Tůma, P., Vandin, A., Vassev, E.: Tools for Ensemble Design and Runtime. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds.) Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. LNCS, vol. 8998, pp. 429–448. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agha, G.A., Meseguer, J., Sen, K.: PMaude: Rewrite-based specification language for probabilistic object systems. In: Cerone, A., Wiklicky, H. (eds.) QAPL 2005. ENTCS, vol. 153(2), pp. 213–239. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. AlTurki, M., Meseguer, J.: pVeStA: A parallel statistical model checking and quantitative analysis tool. In: Corradini, A., Klin, B., Cîrstea, C. (eds.) CALCO 2011. LNCS, vol. 6859, pp. 386–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Belzner, L.: Action programming in rewriting logic (technical communication). Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, Online Supplement (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belzner, L., De Nicola, R., Vandin, A., Wirsing, M.: Reasoning (on) service component ensembles in rewriting logic. In: Iida, S., Meseguer, J., Ogata, K. (eds.) Specification, Algebra, and Software. LNCS, vol. 8373, pp. 188–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentea, L., Ölveczky, P.C.: A probabilistic strategy language for probabilistic rewrite theories and its application to cloud computing. In: Martí-Oliet, N., Palomino, M. (eds.) WADT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7841, pp. 77–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bistarelli, S., Montanari, U., Rossi, F.: Semiring-based constraint satisfaction and optimization. J. ACM 44(2), 201–236 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bistarelli, S., Montanari, U., Rossi, F.: Soft concurrent constraint programming. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 7(3), 563–589 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bortolussi, L., Hillston, J.: Fluid model checking. In: Koutny, M., Ulidowski, I. (eds.) CONCUR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7454, pp. 333–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bortolussi, L., Hillston, J., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Continuous approximation of collective system behaviour: A tutorial. Perform. Eval. 70(5), 317–349 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruni, R., Corradini, A., Gadducci, F., Lluch Lafuente, A., Vandin, A.: Modelling and analyzing adaptive self-assembly strategies with Maude. In: Durán, F. (ed.) WRLA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7571, pp. 118–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bures, T., De Nicola, R., Gerostathopoulos, I., Hoch, N., Kit, M., Koch, N., Monreale, G.V., Montanari, U., Pugliese, R., Serbedzija, N., Wirsing, M., Zambonelli, F.: A Life Cycle for the Development of Autonomic Systems: The e-mobility showcase. In: Proc. of SASOW, pp. 71–76. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cabri, G., Capodieci, N., Cesari, L., De Nicola, R., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F., Zambonelli, F.: Self-expression and dynamic attribute-based ensembles in SCEL. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8802, pp. 147–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Castro, M., Druschel, P., Kermarrec, A.-M., Rowstron, A.: Scalable Application-Level Anycast for Highly Dynamic Groups. In: Stiller, B., Carle, G., Karsten, M., Reichl, P. (eds.) NGC 2003 and ICQT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2816, pp. 47–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Cesari, L., De Nicola, R., Pugliese, R., Puviani, M., Tiezzi, F., Zambonelli, F.: Formalising adaptation patterns for autonomic ensembles. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Liu, Z., Xue, J. (eds.) FACS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8348, pp. 100–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS, vol. 4350. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Combaz, J., Bensalem, S., Tiezzi, F., Margheri, A., Pugliese, R., Kofron, J.: Correctness of Service Components and Service Component Ensembles. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds.) Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. LNCS, vol. 8998, pp. 107–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E.C., Sloman, M.: The Ponder Policy Specification Language. In: Sloman, M., Lobo, J., Lupu, E.C. (eds.) POLICY 2001. LNCS, vol. 1995, pp. 18–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G.-L., Loreti, M., Pugliese, R.: A Language-Based Approach to Autonomic Computing. In: Beckert, B., Damiani, F., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M. (eds.) FMCO 2011. LNCS, vol. 7542, pp. 25–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://www.ascens-ist.eu/scel

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G., Pugliese, R.: Klaim: A Kernel Language for Agents Interaction and Mobility. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 24(5), 315–330 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. De Nicola, R., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Rate-based transition systems for stochastic process calculi. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5556, pp. 435–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. De Nicola, R., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: A uniform definition of stochastic process calculi. ACM Comput. Surv. 46(1), 1–5 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Nicola, R., Lluch Lafuente, A., Loreti, M., Morichetta, A., Pugliese, R., Senni, V., Tiezzi, F.: Programming and verifying component ensembles. In: Bensalem, S., Lakhneck, Y., Legay, A. (eds.) From Programs to Systems. LNCS, vol. 8415, pp. 69–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. De Nicola, R., Loreti, M., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: A Formal Approach to Autonomic Systems Programming: The SCEL Language. TAAS 9(2), 7 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eckhardt, J., Mühlbauer, T., AlTurki, M., Meseguer, J., Wirsing, M.: Stable availability under denial of service attacks through formal patterns. In: de Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 78–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilmore, S., Tribastone, M., Vandin, A.: An analysis pathway for the quantitative evaluation of public transport systems. In: Albert, E., Sekerinski, E. (eds.) IFM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8739, pp. 71–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Hölzl, M., Gabor, T.: Reasoning and Learning for Awareness and Adaptation. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds.) Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. LNCS, vol. 8998, pp. 249–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker SPIN. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 23(5), 279–295 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. IBM: Autonomic Computing Policy Language – ACPL, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/tivoli/tutorials/ac-spl/

  30. IBM: An architectural blueprint for autonomic computing. Tech. rep., IBM, Third edition (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khakpour, N., Jalili, S., Talcott, C.L., Sirjani, M., Mousavi, M.R.: Formal modeling of evolving self-adaptive systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 78(1), 3–26 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M., Senni, V.: Stochastically timed predicate-based communication primitives for autonomic computing. In: Bertrand, N., Bortolussi, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Quantitative Aspects of Programming Languages (QAPL 2014). Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (EPTCS), pp. 1–16 (2014), doi:10.4204/EPTCS.154.1

    Google Scholar 

  33. Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M., Senni, V.: On StocS: a Stochastic extension of SCEL. Tech. Rep. 11, ASCENS Project (February 2014), http://www.ascens-ist.eu/

  34. Loreti, M., Margheri, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: On programming and policing autonomic computing systems. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8802, pp. 164–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Margheri, A., Masi, M., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: A Formal Software Engineering Approach to Policy-based Access Control. Tech. rep., DiSIA, Univ. Firenze (2013), available at http://www.ascens-ist.eu/scel

  36. Margheri, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: Linguistic Abstractions for Programming and Policing Autonomic Computing Systems. In: UIC/ATC, pp. 404–409. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Margheri, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: Linguistic abstractions for programming and policing autonomic computing systems. Tech. rep., Univ. Firenze (2013), http://www.ascens-ist.eu/scel

  38. Mayer, P., Klarl, A., Hennicker, R., Puviani, M., Tiezzi, F., Pugliese, R., Keznikl, J., Bure, T.: The autonomic cloud: A vision of voluntary, peer-2-peer cloud computing. In: Proc. of SASOW, pp. 89–94. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. OASIS XACML TC: eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) version 3.0 (January 2013), http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/3.0/xacml-3.0-core-spec-os-en.pdf

  40. O’Grady, R., Groß, R., Christensen, A.L., Dorigo, M.: Self-assembly strategies in a group of autonomous mobile robots. Auton. Robots 28(4), 439–455 (2010), doi:10.1007/s10514-010-9177-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pianini, D., Sebastio, S., Vandin, A.: Distributed statistical analysis of complex systems modeled through a chemical metaphor. In: HPCS (MOSPAS workshop), pp. 416–423. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pinciroli, C., Bonani, M., Mondada, F., Dorigo, M.: Adaptation and Awareness in Robot Ensembles: Scenarios and Algorithms. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds.) Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. LNCS, vol. 8998, pp. 471–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Plotkin, G.D.: A structural approach to operational semantics. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 60-61, 17–139 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Project InterLink (2007), http://interlink.ics.forth.gr

  45. Rossi, F., van Beek, P., Walsh, T.: Handbook of Constraint Programming. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Rowstron, A., Druschel, P.: Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems. In: Guerraoui, R. (ed.) Middleware 2001. LNCS, vol. 2218, pp. 329–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Salehie, M., Tahvildari, L.: Self-adaptive software: Landscape and research challenges. TAAS 4(2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saraswat, V., Rinard, M.: Concurrent constraint programming. In: POPL, pp. 232–245. ACM Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schneider, F.B.: Enforceable security policies. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 3(1), 30–50 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sebastio, S., Amoretti, M., Lluch-Lafuente, A.: A computational field framework for collaborative task execution in volunteer clouds. In: SEAMS, pp. 105–114. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sebastio, S., Vandin, A.: MultiVeStA: statistical model checking for discrete event simulators. In: Horvath, A., Buchholz, P., Cortellessa, V., Muscariello, L., Squillante, M.S. (eds.) 7th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, ValueTools ’13, Torino, Italy, December 10-12, 2013, pp. 310–315. ACM Press, New York (2013), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2631846

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sen, K., Viswanathan, M., Agha, G.A.: Vesta: A statistical model-checker and analyzer for probabilistic systems. In: Baier, C., Chiola, G., Smirni, E. (eds.) QEST 2005, pp. 251–252. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sommerville, I., Cliff, D., Calinescu, R., Keen, J., Kelly, T., Kwiatkowska, M.Z., McDermid, J.A., Paige, R.F.: Large-scale complex IT systems. Commun. ACM 55(7), 71–77 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M.: Knowledge Representation for Adaptive and Self-aware Systems. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds.) Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. LNCS, vol. 8998, pp. 221–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Nicola, R. et al. (2015). The SCEL Language: Design, Implementation, Verification. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds) Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8998. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16310-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16310-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16309-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16310-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics