Water Pollution Reduction: Reverse Combinatorial Auctions Modelling Supporting Decision-Making Processes

1. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (2000)

   Google Scholar 

2. Fiala, P., Kalčevová, J., Vraný, J.: CRAB – CombinatoRial Auction Body Software System. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 3, 718–722 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Šauer, P., Dvořák, A., Fiala, P., Prášek, J.: Methodology for economic and environmental optimisation of reducing pollution in watercourses, University of Economics & Ministry of Agriculture, certificate no. 79469/2013-MZe, Prague (2013)

   Google Scholar 

4. Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., Steinberg, R. (eds.): Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

   Google Scholar 

5. Leyton-Brown, K., Pearson, M., Shoham, Y.: Towards a Universal Test Suite for Combinatorial Auction Algorithms. In: The Proceedings of ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2000) (2000)

   Google Scholar 

6. Balas, E.: An Additive Algorithm for Solving Linear Programs with Zero-one Variables. Operations Research 13, 517–546 (1965)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

7. XA: Linear Optimizer System (2003), http://www.sunsetsoft.com/ (approached December 28, 2009)

8. Government Order of 29 January 2003 No 61/2003 Coll., on the indicators and values of permissible pollution of surface water and wastewater, mandatory elements of the permits for discharge of wastewater into surface water and into sewerage systems, and on sensitive areas (Czech Technological Norm; in Czech) (2003)

   Google Scholar 

9. ČSN 75 6401 Sewage treatment plants for more than 500 of population equivalents.

   Google Scholar 

10. Fiala, P., Šauer, P.: Application of Combinatorial Auctions on Allocation of Public Financial Support in the Area of Environmental Protection: Economic Laboratory Experiment. Politická ekonomie 59(3), 379–392 (2011) (in Czech)

    Google Scholar 

11. Šauer, P., Fiala, P., Dvořák, A.: Environmental negotiation under information asymmetry: a laboratory experiment for coalitions of four parties. Actual Problems of Economics 154(4), 544–550 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

12. Soukopová, J., Struk, M.: Methodology for the efficiency evaluation of the municipal environmental protection expenditure. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Denzer, R. (eds.) Environmental Software Systems. IFIP AICT, vol. 359, pp. 327–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

13. Soukopova, J., Bakos, E.: Assessing the efficiency of municipal expenditures regarding environmental protection. In: Aravossis, K., Brebbia, C.A. (eds.) Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment III. Book Series: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 131, pp. 107–119 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

14. Koontz, T.M., Johnson, E.M.: One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences 37(2), 185–204 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Priscoli, J.D.: What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important? Water International 29(2), 221–227 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Slavikova, L., Jilkova, J.: Implementing the Public Participation Principle into Water Management in the Czech Republic: A Critical Analysis. Regional Studies 45(4), 545–557 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references