Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Improving the Performance of NEAT Related Algorithm via Complexity Reduction in Search Space

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 217))

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the learning aspect of NEAT and its variants in an attempt to solve benchmark problems through fewer generations. In NEAT, genetic algorithm is the key technique that is used to complexify artificial neural network. Crossover value, being the parameter that dictates the evolution of NEAT is reduced. Reducing crossover rate aids in allowing the algorithm to learn. This is because lesser interchange among genes ensures that patterns of genes carrying valuable information is not split or strayed during mating of two chromosomes. By tweaking the crossover parameter and with some minor modification, it is shown that the performance of NEAT can be improved. This enables NEAT algorithm to evolve slowly and retain information even while undergoing complexification. Thus, the learning process in NEAT is greatly enhanced as compared to evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanley, K.O., Miikkulainen, R.: Efficient Evolution of Neural Network Topologies. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), Honolulu, Hawaii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gomez, F., Miikkulainen, R.: Solving non-Markovian control tasks with neuroevolution. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Denver (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moriarty, D.E.: Symbiotic Evolution of Neural Networks in Sequential Decision Tasks. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Technical Report UT-AI97-257 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, Z.: A benchmark for classifier learning. Technical Report TR474, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney, N.S.W. Australia (2006), Anonymous ftp from ftp.cs.su.oz.au.in/pub/tr

  5. Granville, V., Krivanek, M., Rasson, J.P.: Simulated annealing: A proof of convergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16(6), 652–656 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cano, A., Gomez, M., Moral, S.: Application of a hill-climbing algorithm to exact and approximate inference in credal networks. In: 4th International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley, K.O.: Exploiting Regularity without Development. In: Proceedings of the 2006 AAAI Fall Symposium on Developmental Systems. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stanley, K.O., Miikkulainen, R.: Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 63–100 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Whiteson, S., Stanley, K.O., Miikkulainen, R.: Automatic Feature Selection in Neuroevolution. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Workshop on Self-Organization (GECCO 2004), Seattle, WA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. http://amazingdiscoveries.org/Cdeception_gene_chromosome_sexual_reproduction.hmtl (accessed December 17, 2011)

  11. Moriarty, D.E., Miikkulainen, R.: Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution. Machine Learning 22, 11–32 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baird, L.C.: Residual Algorithms: Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation. In: Prieditis, A., Russell, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, July 9-12 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ai-lab/?neatmatlab (accessed on October 25, 2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heman Mohabeer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohabeer, H., Soyjaudah, K.M.S. (2013). Improving the Performance of NEAT Related Algorithm via Complexity Reduction in Search Space. In: Omatu, S., Neves, J., Rodriguez, J., Paz Santana, J., Gonzalez, S. (eds) Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 217. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00551-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00551-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00550-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00551-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics