Abstract
The classical von Neumann–Morgenstern’s notion of lottery is generalized by replacing a probability distribution on a finite support with a belief function on the power set of the support. Given a partial preference relation on a finite set of generalized lotteries, a necessary and sufficient condition (weak rationality) is provided for its representation as a Choquet expected utility of a strictly increasing utility function.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M.: Choquet expected utility model: a new approach to individual behavior under uncertainty and social choice welfare. In: Fuzzy Meas. and Int.: Th. and App., pp. 289–314. Physica, Heidelberg (2000)
Coletti, G., Regoli, G.: How can an expert system help in choosing the optimal decision? Th. and Dec. 33(3), 253–264 (1992)
Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Toward a General Theory of Conditional Beliefs. Int. J. of Int. Sys. 21, 229–259 (2006)
Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R., Vantaggi, B.: Inferential processes leading to possibility and necessity. Inf. Sci. 245, 132–145 (2013)
Dempster, A.P.: Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping. Ann. of Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)
Denneberg, D.: Non-additive Measure and Integral. Theory and Decision Library: Series B, vol. 27. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1994)
Ellsberg, D.: Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms. Quart. Jour. of Econ. 75, 643–669 (1961)
Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y.: Uncertainty, belief and probability. Comput. Int. 7(3), 160–173 (1991)
Gale, D.: The Theory of Linear Economic Models. McGraw Hill (1960)
Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Additive representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet integral. Ann. of Op. Res. 52, 43–65 (1994)
Jaffray, J.Y.: Linear utility theory for belief functions. Op. Res. Let. 8(2), 107–112 (1989)
Mc Cord, M., de Neufville, R.: Lottery Equivalents: Reduction of the Certainty Effect Problem in Utility Assessment. Man. Sci. 23(1), 56–60 (1986)
Miranda, E., de Cooman, G., Couso, I.: Lower previsions induced by multi-valued mappings. J. of Stat. Plan. and Inf. 133, 173–197 (2005)
Quiggin, J.: A Theory of Anticipated Utility. J. of Ec. Beh. and Org. 3, 323–343 (1982)
Savage, L.: The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)
Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 571–587 (1989)
Schmeidler, D.: Integral representation without additivity. Proc. of the Am. Math. Soc. 97(2), 255–261 (1986)
Smets, P.: Decision making in the tbm: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 38(2), 133–147 (2005)
von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press (1944)
Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Chapman & Hall, London (1991)
Wakker, P.: Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical. Th. and Dec. 29(2), 119–132 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Coletti, G., Petturiti, D., Vantaggi, B. (2014). Choquet Expected Utility Representation of Preferences on Generalized Lotteries. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 443. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08855-6_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08854-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08855-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)