Abstract
The unreasonable design of interface information has given rise to malfunctions of cognition and decision-making among operators, thus leading users into a complex cognition and finally resulting in serious failures in information recognition and analysis, and even in operation and execution processes, which poses one of the major causes for many accidents. Firstly, there remains an internal relevance between errors and perception, and five error factors i.e., visual confined, visual interference, visual illusion, attention shift and over attention were extracted from the point of visual attention mechanism; Secondly, the cognitive model (theory) and psychological experimental paradigm corresponding to the cognitive level were combed out through explanation of the error level, thus the misperception model was established; Finally, It provides a feasible basis for design improvement of visual interface through behavior and physiological experimental data. This misperception analysis method of visual interface has applied mature psychological experimental paradigm and can favorably analyze the design factors from the aspect of misperception, so as to play a significant role in improving the visual interface design.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Shen, J.: Guidance of eye movements during conjunctive visual search: The distractor-ratio effect. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 63(2B), 6126 (2003)
Schweizer, K.: Visual search, reaction time, and cognitive a-bility. Perceptual and Motor Skills 86(1), 79–84 (1998)
Williams, C.C.: Age differences in visual memory and the re-lation to eye movements and executive control processes in visual search. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 64(8B), 4080 (2004)
Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Brocklehurst, N., UnderwoodJ, C.D.: Visual attention while driving: Sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers. Ergonomics 46(6), 629–646 (2003)
Lee, T.S.: Computations in the early visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 97, 121–139 (2003)
Grill-Spector, K., Malach, R.: The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27, 649–677 (2004)
Norman, D.A.: Categorisation of action slips. Psychology Review 88, 1–15 (1981)
Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)
Reason, J.: Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal 320, 768–770 (2000)
Leshan, L.: Human computer interface design. Science Press, Beijing (2004) (in Chinese)
Fang, H.: Uninhibited processing mechanism of prioritizing selection in preview search. Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (2006)
Shihui, H.: The global precedence in visual information processing. Journal of Chinese Psychology 32(3), 337–347 (2000) (in Chinese)
Petty, R.E., Desteno, D., Rueher, D.D.: The Role of Affect in Attitude Change. In: Forgas, J.P. (ed.) Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition, pp. 212–229. Lawrence Erlbaurn, Mahwah (2001)
Neisser, U.: Cognition and reality: principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W.H.Freeman (1976)
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J., Viding, E.: Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 339–354 (2004)
Lavie, N.: Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 75–82 (2005)
Desimone, R., Duncan, J.: Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 193–222 (1995)
Bjorklund, D.F.: Children’s thinking, 4th edn., 119–140, 142–145,162–163, 343–344. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont (2003)
Theeuwes, J., Burger, R.: Attentional Control during Visual Search the Effect of Irrelevant Singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 1342–1353 (1998)
Theeuwes, J.: Top-down Search Strategies Cannot Override Attentional Capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(1), 65–70 (2004)
Fleetwood, M.D., Byrne, M.D.: Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM. Cognitive Systems Research 3, 25–33 (2002)
Fleetwood, M.D., Byrne, M.D.: Modeling the Visual Search of Displays:A Revised ACT-R/PM Model of Icon Search Based on Eye-Tracking and Experimental Data. Human-Computer Interaction 21(2), 153–197 (2006)
Monnier, P.: Redundant coding assessed in a visual search task. Displays 24(1), 49–55 (2003)
Bolin, Y.: An experimental study of effects of character spacing under visual interference. Psychological Science 17(3), 129–132 (1994) (in chinese)
Van Orden, K.F., Divita, J., Shim, M.J.: Redundant use of luminance and flashing with shape and color as highlighting codes in symbolic displays. Human Factors 35, 195–204 (1993)
Wickens, C.D., Andre, A.D.: Proximity compatibility and information display: effects of color, space, and object display on information integration. Human Factors 32(1), 61–77 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, X., Xue, C., Feng, Z. (2014). Misperception Model-Based Analytic Method of Visual Interface Design Factors. In: Harris, D. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. EPCE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8532. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07514-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07515-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)