User and Group Behavior in Computer Support for Collaborative Reflection in Practice: An Explorative Data Analysis

1. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

   Google Scholar 

2. Boud D (1985) Reflection: turning experience into learning. Kogan Page, London

   Google Scholar 

3. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic books New York

   Google Scholar 

4. Reynolds M (1999) Critical reflection and management education: rehabilitating less hierarchical approaches. J Manage Educ 23(5):537–553

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Isaacs E, Konrad A, Walendowski A, Lennig T, Hollis V, Whittaker S (2013) Echoes from the past: how technology mediated reflection improves well-being. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 1071–1080

   Google Scholar 

6. Prilla M, Degeling M, Herrmann T (2012) Collaborative reflection at work: supporting informal learning at a healthcare workplace. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on supporting group work (GROUP 2012), pp 55–64

   Google Scholar 

7. Dennis AR, George JF, Jessup LM, Nunamaker Jr JF, Vogel DR (1988) Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Q 12(4): 591–624

   Google Scholar 

8. Hoyrup S (2004) Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. J Workplace Learn 16(8):442–454

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Prilla M, Pammer V, Krogstie B (2013) Fostering collaborative redesign of work practice: challenges for tools supporting reflection at work. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW 2013)

   Google Scholar 

10. Tigelaar D, Dolmans D, Meijer P, de Grave W, van der Vleuten C (2008) Teachers’ interactions and their collaborative reflection processes during Peer meetings. Adv Health Sci Educ 13(3):289–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Loo R, Thorpe K (2002) Using reflective learning journals to improve individual and team performance. Team Perform Manage 8(5):134

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Daudelin MW (1996) Learning from experience through reflection. Org Dyn 24(3):36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Scott SG (2010) Enhancing reflection skills through learning portfolios: an empirical test. J Manage Educ 34(3):430–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Kerth NL (2001) Project retrospectives. Dorset House, Shelburne

    Google Scholar 

15. Crowston K, Kammerer EE (1998) Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Syst J 37(2):227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

17. Dennis AR, George JF, Jessup LM, Nunamaker Jr JF, Vogel DR (1988) Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Q 591–624

    Google Scholar 

18. Power DJ, Sharda R (2009) Decision support systems. Springer handbook of automation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1539–1548

    Google Scholar 

19. Roschelle J, Teasley S (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer supported collaborative learning. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 69–97

    Google Scholar 

20. Lockhorst D, Admiraal W, Pilot A, Veen W (2003) Analysis of electronic communication using 5 different perspectives. In: Proceedings Symposium conducted at the 30th Onderwijs Research Dagen (ORD), Kerkrade, Netherlands, 2003

    Google Scholar 

21. Peesapati ST, Schwanda V, Schultz J, Lepage M, Jeong S, Cosley D (2010) Pensieve: supporting everyday reminiscence. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 2027–2036

    Google Scholar 

22. De Groot E, Endedijk MD, Jaarsma ADC, Simons PR-J, van Beukelen P (2013) Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Stud Continuing Educ 0(0):1–23

    Google Scholar 

23. Fleck R, Fitzpatrick G (2010) Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In: Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the computer-human interaction special interest group of Australia on computer-human interaction, ACM, pp 216–223

    Google Scholar 

24. Bjørn P, Boulus N (2011) Dissenting in reflective conversations: critical components of doing action research. Action Res 9(3):282–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Forneris SG, Peden-McAlpine C (2007) Evaluation of a reflective learning intervention to improve critical thinking in novice nurses. J Adv Nurs 57(4):410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Xiao L, Clark S, Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2008) Promoting reflective thinking in collaborative learning activities. In: Proceedings of the 2008 8th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, IEEE Computer Society, pp 709–711

    Google Scholar 

27. Lin X, Hmelo C, Kinzer CK, Secules TJ (1999) Designing technology to support reflection. Educ Tech Res Dev 47(3):43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. White BY, Shimoda TA, Frederiksen JR (1999) Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. Int J Artif Intell Educ (IJAIED) 10:151–182

    Google Scholar 

29. Järvinen A, Poikela E (2001) Modelling reflective and contextual learning at work. J Workplace Learn 13(7–8):282–290

    Google Scholar 

30. Dyke M (2006) The role of the ‘Other’ in reflection, knowledge formation and action in a late modernity. Int J Lifelong Educ 25(2):105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Van Woerkom M, Croon M (2008) Operationalising critically reflective work behaviour. Pers Rev 37(3):317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Levina N (2005) Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: a collective reflection-in-action view. Inf Syst Res 16(2):109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Raelin JA (2002) I don’t have time to think!” versus the art of reflective practice. Reflections 4(1):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Lockhorst D, Admiraal W, Pilot A, Veen W (2003) Analysis of electronic communication using 5 different perspectives

    Google Scholar 

35. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references