Abstract
Legal cases can be lengthy and complex, often containing much information, evidence, and legal arguments. On the contrary, attorneys, judges, and legal researchers must review multiple cases to build arguments, make decisions, or conduct legal research. Summarizing cases can help legal professionals and researchers quickly grasp the essential details without reading through every word of the original documents. While various legal case summarization algorithms exist in the literature, they lack a systematic integration of the various summary quality factors necessary to create comprehensive and concise legal summaries. To address this gap, the present paper proposes an innovative extractive summarization approach by leveraging the use of legal-domain knowledge in the multi-objective optimization-based evolutionary framework. Our method simultaneously optimizes different objectives, including legal domain knowledge, tf-idf scores, and diversity, to get good-quality summaries. As per our knowledge, this work is the first of its kind in utilizing the efficacy of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for generating legal document summaries. For evaluation, we thoroughly conduct experiments on legal case documents from the Indian Supreme Court, accompanied by gold-standard summaries created by legal experts. The results obtained reveal that our algorithm demonstrates significant improvements of 16.00%, 12.91%, 13.65%, and 0.18%, over the state-of-the-art technique, in terms of ROUGE-2 F1, ROUGE-L F1, ROUGE-2 Recall, and ROUGE-L Recall, respectively. Further, the statistical significance of the results is also validated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For more information, see https://irwinlaw.com/cold/catchwords.
References
Bhattacharya, P., Hiware, K., Rajgaria, S., Pochhi, N., Ghosh, K., Ghosh, S.: A comparative study of summarization algorithms applied to legal case judgments. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval (2019)
Bhattacharya, P., Poddar, S., Rudra, K., Ghosh, K., Ghosh, S.: Incorporating domain knowledge for extractive summarization of legal case documents. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2021, pp. 22–31. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466092
Cheng, J., Lapata, M.: Neural summarization by extracting sentences and words. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2016)
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI: 6th International Conference Paris, France, 18–20 September 2000 Proceedings 6, pp. 849–858. Springer (2000)
Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT (2019)
Dong, Y.: A survey on neural network-based summarization methods. CoRR (2018). arXiv:1804.04589
Erkan, G., Radev, D.R.: Lexrank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Int. Res. 22(1), 457–479 (2004)
Farzindar, A., Lapalme, G.: Letsum, an automatic legal text summarizing system. In: Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX) (2004)
Jing, H.: Sentence reduction for automatic text summarization. In: Proceedings of the Applied Natural Language Processing Conference (2000)
Kusner, M., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N., Weinberger, K.: From word embeddings to document distances. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 957–966 (2015)
Liu, C.L., Chen, K.C.: Extracting the gist of Chinese judgments of the supreme court. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL) (2019)
Liu, Y., Lapata, M.: Text summarization with pretrained encoders. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP-IJCNLP (2019)
Luhn, H.: The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2(2), 159–165 (1958)
Mallick, C., Das, A.K., Ding, W., Nayak, J.: Ensemble summarization of bio-medical articles integrating clustering and multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Appl. Soft Comput. 106, 107347 (2021)
Mandal, A., Ghosh, K., Pal, A., Ghosh, S.: Automatic catchphrase identification from legal court case documents. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 2187–2190. CIKM 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3133102
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
Mishra, S.K., Harshavardhan, K., Mitra, S., Saha, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Bug report summarization using multi-view multi-objective optimization framework. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1245–1253 (2022)
Nallapati, R., Zhai, F., Zhou, B.: Summarunner: a recurrent neural network based sequence model for extractive summarization of documents. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 31 (2017)
Paul, S., Mandal, A., Goyal, P., Ghosh, S.: Pre-trained language models for the legal domain: a case study on Indian law. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2023) (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06049
Polsley, S., Jhunjhunwala, P., Huang, R.: Casesummarizer: a system for automated summarization of legal texts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING) System Demonstrations (2016)
Saini, N., Kumar, S., Saha, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Mining graph-based features in multi-objective framework for microblog summarization. In: 2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2020)
Saini, N., Saha, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Multiobjective-based approach for microblog summarization. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 6(6), 1219–1231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2019.2945172
Saini, N., Saha, S., Bhattacharyya, P., Tuteja, H.: Textual entailment–based figure summarization for biomedical articles. ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. (TOMM) 16(1s), 1–24 (2020)
Saravanan, M., Ravindran, B., Raman, S.: Improving legal document summarization using graphical models. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX (2006)
Wu, H.C., Luk, R.W.P., Wong, K.F., Kwok, K.L.: Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 26(3), 1–37 (2008)
Zhong, L., Zhong, Z., Zhao, Z., Wang, S., Ashley, K.D., Grabmair, M.: Automatic summarization of legal decisions using iterative masking of predictive sentences. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL) (2019)
Zhou, A., Qu, B.Y., Li, H., Zhao, S.Z., Suganthan, P.N., Zhang, Q.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol. Comput. 1(1), 32–49 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goswami, S., Saini, N., Shukla, S. (2025). Incorporating Domain Knowledge in Multi-objective Optimization Framework for Automating Indian Legal Case Summarization. In: Antonacopoulos, A., Chaudhuri, S., Chellappa, R., Liu, CL., Bhattacharya, S., Pal, U. (eds) Pattern Recognition. ICPR 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78495-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78495-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-78494-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-78495-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)