Abstract
Quantum computing as an inevitable technology can revolutionize many aspects of our society. One potential impact is on cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin, which relies on proof-of-work mining to secure the underlying blockchain protocol. Miners empowered by quantum computers will have superior computational power to win the competition. The quantum advantage jeopardizes the security and trustworthy of cryptocurrency and the transaction validation process by taking over a majority of the network’s computing power, known as a \(51\%\) attack. Fraudulent Bitcoin transactions in the form of double spending can happen, and the emerging quantum miner could enable double spending and benefit from it. How much double spending is optimal without causing too much “inflation”? What shall be the optimal strategy of the first quantum miner facing the competition from other quantum miners? What are the implications of having one or multiple quantum miners to the security of the Bitcoin network? We conduct a novel game theoretic and economic analysis to address these questions. Simulation illustrates that quantum miners would have to collude to gain from double spending in a quantum competitive environment. The distribution of cryptocurrency between quantum miners and classical miners and how cost-effective classical miners are can affect the profitability and the sustainability of double spending as well as the collusion of quantum miners. Intensified quantum competition will decrease the chance of collusion and eventually make the Bitcoin network secure again. The critical point of quantum popularity that will eliminate double spending is found.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., et al.: Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019)
Bailey, B., Sattath, O.: \(51\%\) attack via difficulty increase with a small quantum miner. arXiv:2403.08023 (2024)
Bertucci, C., Bertucci, L., Lasry, J.M., Lions, P.L.: Mean field game approach to bitcoin mining. arXiv:2004.08167 (2020)
Breiki, H.A.: Trust evolution game in blockchain. In: Proceedings of 2022 IEEE/ACS 19th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (2022)
Chiu, J., Koeppl, T.V.: The economics of cryptocurrency: bitcoin and beyond. Can. J. Econ. 55(4), 1762–1798 (2022)
Chohan, U.W.: The double spending problem and cryptocurrencies. SSRN (2021)
Eisert, J., Wilkens, M., Lewenstein, M.: Quantum games and quantum strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(15), 3077–3080 (1999)
Holmes, S., Chen, L.: Assessment of quantum threat to bitcoin and derived cryptocurrencies. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2021, 967 (2021)
Jang, J., Lee, H.N.: Profitable double-spending attacks. Appl. Sci. 10(23) (2020)
Kappert, N., Karger, E., Kureljusic, M.: Quantum computing - the impeding end for the blockchain? In: Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Dubai, UAE (2021)
Kiktenko, E.O., et al.: Quantum-secured blockchain. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3(3), 35004 (2018)
Kim, D., Ryu, D., Webb, R.I.: Determination of equilibrium transaction fees in the Bitcoin network: a rank-order contest. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 86 (2023)
Kim, Y., et al.: Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance. Nature 618, 500–505 (2023)
Li, Z., Liao, Q.: Toward socially optimal bitcoin mining. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), Zhengzhou, China (2018)
Li, Z., Liao, Q.: Is quantum computing the bitcoin terminator? In: Proceedings of the 30th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 1–10 (2024)
Li, Z., Reppen, A.M., Sircar, R.: A mean field games model for cryptocurrency mining. Manag. Sci. 70(4) (2023)
Liu, Z., et al.: A survey on applications of game theory in blockchain. arXiv:1902.10865 (2019)
Moore, W.O.: Demystifying bitcoin’s ownership landscape. Grayscale (2023)
Nguyen, C.T., Hoang, D.T., Nguyen, D.N., Niyato, D., Nguyen, H.T., Dutkiewicz, E.: Proof-of-stake consensus mechanisms for future blockchain networks: fundamentals, applications and opportunities. IEEE Access 7, 85727–85745 (2019)
Nuzzi, L., Waters, K., Andrade, M.: Breaking BFT: quantifying the cost to attack Bitcoin and Ethereum. SSRN (2024)
Pinzón, C., Rocha, C.: Double-spend attack models with time advantage for bitcoin. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 329, 79–103 (2016)
Pérez-Antón, R., Sánchez, J.I.L., Corbi, A.: The game theory in quantum computers: a review. Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. (2023)
Stewart, I., Ilie, D., Zamyatin, A., Werner, S., Torshizi, M.F., Knottenbelt, W.J.: Committing to quantum resistance: a slow defence for bitcoin against a fast quantum computing attack. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 180410 (2018)
Tas, E.N., Tse, D., Gai, F., Kannan, S., Maddah-Ali, M.A., Yu, F.: Bitcoin-enhanced proof-of-stake security: possibilities and impossibilities. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA (2023)
Zaghloul, E., Li, T., Mutka, M.W., Ren, J.: Bitcoin and blockchain: security and privacy. IEEE Internet Things J. 7(10), 10288–10313 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, Z., Liao, Q. (2025). How Much Should I Double Spend My Bitcoin? Game Theory of Quantum Mining. In: Sinha, A., Fu, J., Zhu, Q., Zhang, T. (eds) Decision and Game Theory for Security. GameSec 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14908. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74835-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74835-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-74834-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-74835-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)