Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Finding Optimal Classroom Arrangements to Minimize Cheating in Exams Using a Hybrid AI System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems (HAIS 2024)

Abstract

In this work, we propose a hybrid AI system consisting of a multi-agent system simulating students during an exam and a teacher monitoring them, as well as an evolutionary algorithm that finds classroom arrangements which minimize cheating incentives. The students will answer the exam based on how much knowledge they have about the topic of the exam. In our simulation, then they enter a decision phase in which, for those questions they don’t know the answer to, they will either cheat or answer by guessing. If a student gets caught cheating, his/her exam will be cancelled. The purpose of this study is to examine the question of how different monitoring behaviors on the part of the teacher affect the cheating behaviors of students. The results of this study show that an unbiased teacher, that is, a teacher that monitors every student with the same probability, produces minimal cheating incentives for students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bäck, T.: Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming. Genetic Algorithms. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bucciol, A., Cicognani, S., Montinari, N.: Cheating in university exams: the relevance of social factors. International Review of Economics 67(3), 319–338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00343-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cagala, T., Glogowsky, U., Rincke, J.: Detecting and preventing cheating in exams: evidence from a field experiment. J. Hum. Resour. 59(1), 210–241 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodeen, H.M.: Undergraduate student cheating in exams. Damascus Univ. J. 28(1), 37–55 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Genemo, M.D.: Suspicious activity recognition for monitoring cheating in exams. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 88, 1–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-022-00069-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, M.: An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (Complex Adaptive Systems Series), 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramezanian, R., Emdadi, A.: Simulation of Skulduggery in a Multi-Agent System. Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst. 7(1), 17–31 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siev, S., Kliger, D.: Cheating in academic exams: a field study. In: Buccicol, A., Montinari, N. (eds.) Dishonesty in Behavioral Economics. 1st edn., pp. 111–140. Academic Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sklar, E., Davies, M., Co, M.S.T.: SimEd: simulating education as a multi agent system. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 4, pp. 998–1005 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sklar, E., Davies, M.: Multiagent simulation of learning environments. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ‘05), pp. 953–959 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, R.: Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tryfos, P.: Business Statistics, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, Ryerson (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y., Niu, L., Ren, F.: A multi-agent-based approach for the study of student behavior dynamics in peer learning environments. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE), pp. 689–694 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yee, K., MacKown, P.: Detecting and Preventing Cheating During Exams. In: Pedagogy, not Policing, vol. 141, pp. 141–147 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by Asociación Mexicana de Cultura, A.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo León Alazraki Salas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alazraki Salas, P.L., Gómez de Silva Garza, A. (2025). Finding Optimal Classroom Arrangements to Minimize Cheating in Exams Using a Hybrid AI System. In: Quintián, H., et al. Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14857. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74183-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74183-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-74182-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-74183-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics