Exploring Categorizations of Algorithmic Affordances in Graphical User Interfaces of Recommender Systems

1. Amershi, S., Fogarty, J., Kapoor, A., Tan, D.: Effective end-user interaction with machine learning (2011)

   Google Scholar 

2. Petridis, S., Daskalova, N., Mennicken, S., Way, S.F., Lamere, P., Thom, J.: Tastepaths: enabling deeper exploration and understanding of personal preferences in recommender systems. In: 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 120–133, March 2022

   Google Scholar 

3. He, C., Parra, D., Verbert, K.: Interactive recommender systems: a survey of the state of the art and future research challenges and opportunities. Expert Syst. Appl. 56, 9–27 (2016)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Keim, D.A.: Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 8(1), 1–8 (2002)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

5. Ananny, M., Crawford, K.: Seeing without knowing: imitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Med. Soc. 20(3), 973–989 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

6. Shin, D., Park, Y.J.: Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 98, 277–284 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Van Rossen, S., Kluijtmans, E., Van Brussel, S., Van Harsel, M., Smarius, J., van der Stappen, E.: Recommender systems for students in flexible education: an exploration of benefits and risks. In: Bramwell-Dicks, A., Evans, A., Norcera, J., Petrie, H., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2023 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 14536, pp. 1–9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_18

8. Pott, K., Smits, A., Agotai, D.: Recognizing the algorithmic literacy of users in XAI - an example-based approach. In: Bramwell-Dicks, A., Evans, A., Norcera, J., Petrie, H., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2023 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 14536, pp. 1–9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_20

9. Eslami, M. et al.: First i like it, then i hide it: folk theories of social feeds. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2371–2382, May 2016

   Google Scholar 

10. Gretarsson, B., O’Donovan, J., Bostandjiev, S., Hall, C., Höllerer, T.: Smallworlds: visualizing social recommendations. Comput. Graph. Forum 29(3), 833–842. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

11. Rani, N., Chu, S.L., Mei, V.R.: Investigating the effects of different levels of user control on the effectiveness of context-aware recommender systems for web-based search. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, pp. 1–6, April 2022

    Google Scholar 

12. Smits, A., van Turnhout, K.: Towards a practice-led research agenda for user interface design of recommender systems. In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., Kristín Lárusdóttir, M., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023. INTERACT 2023. LNCS, vol. 14144, pp. 170–190. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_10

13. Shin, D.: How do users interact with algorithm recommender systems? The interaction of users, algorithms, and performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 109, 106344 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Alexander, C.: A pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)

    Google Scholar 

15. Lehmann, F., Buschek, D.: Autocompletion as a basic interaction concept for user-centered AI (2020)

    Google Scholar 

16. Hekman, E., Nguyen, D., Stalenhoef, M.: Towards a pattern library for algorithmic affordances. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3124, pp. 24–33. CEUR WS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

17. Andjelkovic, I., Parra, D., O’Donovan, J.: Moodplay: interactive mood-based music discovery and recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 275–279, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

18. Knijnenburg, B.P., Bostandjiev, S., O’Donovan, J., Kobsa, A.: Inspectability and control in social recommenders. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 43–50, September 2012

    Google Scholar 

19. Palanque, P., Paternò, F., Roto, V., Schmidt, A., Stumpf, S., Ziegler, J.: A multi-perspective panel on user-centred transparency, explainability, and controllability in automations. In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., Kristín Lárusdóttir, M., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023. INTERACT 2023. LNCS, pp. 349–353. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42293-5_34

20. Tsai, C.H., Brusilovsky, P.: Explaining recommendations in an interactive hybrid social recommender. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 391–396, March 2019

    Google Scholar 

21. Jin, Y., Cardoso, B., Verbert, K.: How do different levels of user control affect cognitive load and acceptance of recommendations? In: Jin, Y., Cardoso, B., Verbert, K. (eds.), 2017, August. How do different levels of user control affect cognitive load and acceptance of recommendations? In Proceedings of the 4th Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems co-located with ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2017), Vol. 1884, pp. 35–42. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

22. Jannach, D., Jugovac, M., Nunes, I.: Explanations and user control in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Personalization and Recommendation on the Web and Beyond, p. 31, September 2019

    Google Scholar 

23. Langacker, R.W., Lakoff, G.: Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Language (Baltim) 64 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/415440

24. Smits, A., Bartels, E., Detweiler, C., van Turnhout, K.: Algorithmic affordances in recommender interfaces. In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., Kristín Lárusdóttir, M., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023. INTERACT 2023. LNCS, vol. 14145, pp. 605–609. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42293-5_80

25. Waldner, W., Vassileva, J.: A visualization interface for Twitter timeline activity. In: Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems, p. 45, September 2014

    Google Scholar 

26. Spencer, D., Warfel, T.: Card sorting: a definitive guide. Boxes Arrows 2(2004), 1–23 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

27. Rugg, G., McGeorge, P.: The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert. Syst. 14(2), 80–93 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Kunkel, J., Loepp, B., Ziegler, J.: A 3D item space visualization for presenting and manipulating user preferences in collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 3–15, March 2017

    Google Scholar 

29. Tan, J., Xu, S., Ge, Y., Li, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, Y.: Counterfactual explainable recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 1784–1793, October 2021

    Google Scholar 

30. Wünn, T.: Trust in artificial intelligence: exploring the influence of model presentation and interaction on trust. University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (2023)

    Google Scholar 

31. Lenz, E., Diefenbach, S., Hassenzahl, M.: Exploring relationships between interaction attributes and experience. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 126–135, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

32. Smits, A., Van Turnhout, K., Hekman, E., Nguyen, D.: Data-driven design. In: DS 104: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2020), VIA Design, VIA University in Herning, Denmark, 10th–11th September 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

33. Dalsgaard, P., Hansen, L.K.: Performing perception - Staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 15(3), 1–33 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Van Rossen, S., et al.: Design ideas for recommender systems in flexible education: how algorithmic affordances may address ethical concerns. In: Bramwell-Dicks, A., Evans, A., Norcera, J., Petrie, H., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2023 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 14536, pp. 1–9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_19

35. Smits, A., et al.: Assessing the utility of an interaction qualities framework in systematizing the evaluation of user control. In: Bramwell-Dicks, A., Evans, A., Norcera, J., Petrie, H., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2023 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 14536, pp. 1–11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_17

36. Smarius, J., Van Der Stappen, E.: Designing a choice support system for students in flexible curricula. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3569173.3569178

Download references