Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

The Influence of the Level of Detail and Interactivity of 3D Elements on UX in XR Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14706))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 328 Accesses

Abstract

In the realm of extended reality (XR) applications, a significant challenge lies in the resource-intensive rendering of 3D models, which often demand high computational power, creating a need for optimization. However, not all elements within a 3D environment are equally important for the user experience (UX). Recognizing and effectively addressing this could greatly enhance the performance of XR applications. How can manipulating the level of detail (LOD) increase the overall quality of user interactions? It was hypothesised that there would be no significant effect on participants’ perception of the reduction of LOD for non-interactive objects, thereby forming the null hypothesis for \(H_1\). Additionally, a second hypothesis was proposed: The reduction of LOD of non-interactive objects would not significantly affect the game enjoyment, forming the null hypothesis for \(H_2\). A virtual reality (VR) survival game was developed in Unreal Engine to test these hypotheses. The virtual environment contained two types of objects: interactive objects (e.g., barrels and weapons) and non-interactive objects (e.g., pallets and shelves). Using interactive objects, players must defend themselves against multiple enemies. Users had to play through different conditions with a decreasing LOD of non-interactive objects and answer a post-session questionnaire. Only 5 out of 53 participants noticed a difference in quality. Furthermore, the majority of participants reported equal game satisfaction for every condition. These findings indicate that a decrease in the LOD of non-interactive objects is not significantly perceptible and does not significantly affect the UX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.unrealengine.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://quixel.com/megascans/.

References

  1. Buhr, M., Pfeiffer, T., Reiners, D., Cruz-Neira, C., Jung, B.: Echtzeitaspekte von VR-Systemen. Springer Vieweg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28903-3

  2. Chang, E., Kim, H.T., Yoo, B.: Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 36(17), 1658–1682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. HarperPerennial, New York, 1. harperperennial ed edn. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. El-Nasr, M.S., Yan, S.: Visual attention in 3D video games. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, p. 22. ACM, Hollywood California USA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178849

  5. Gallagher, M., Ferrè, E.R.: Cybersickness: a multisensory integration perspective. Multisensory Res. 31(7), 645–674 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20181293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guenter, B., Finch, M., Drucker, S., Tan, D., Snyder, J.: Foveated 3D graphics. ACM Trans. Graph. 31(6), 1–10 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2366145.2366183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization: ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). Tech. Rep. ISO 9241-210:2010, International Organization for Standardization, Genf (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koulieris, G.A., Drettakis, G., Cunningham, D., Mania, K.: C-LOD: context-aware material level-of-detail applied to mobile graphics. Comput. Graph. Forum 33(4), 41–49 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LaViola, J.J.: A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32(1), 47–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Möller, S., Schmidt, S., Beyer, J.: Gaming taxonomy: an overview of concepts and evaluation methods for computer gaming QoE. In: 2013 Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 236–241 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2013.6603243

  11. Reddy, M.: Specification and evaluation of level of detail selection criteria. Virtual Reality 3(2), 132–143 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slater, M., Banakou, D., Beacco, A., Gallego, J., Macia-Varela, F., Oliva, R.: A separate reality: an update on place illusion and plausibility in virtual reality. Front. Virtual Real. 3 (2022). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2022.914392

  14. Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6(6), 603–616 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watson, B., Walker, N., Hodges, L.F., Worden, A.: Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance with a head-mounted display. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 4(4), 323–346 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work would not have been possible without the effort of Annalena Wittig, Denys Babenko, Ella Danay, Lin Son Cheung, Milos Denck, Shao-Chieh Lee, Colin Schreiber, and You-Jin Kim, who contributed to the design and development of the shown solution. This work was partly funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the state of Berlin under the Excellence Strategy of the Federal Government and the Länder.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Vergari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vergari, M. et al. (2024). The Influence of the Level of Detail and Interactivity of 3D Elements on UX in XR Applications. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14706. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61041-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61041-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61040-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61041-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics