The Social Consequences of Language Technologies and Their Underlying Language Ideologies

• Ajisoko, P.: The use of Duolingo apps to improve English vocabulary learning. Int. J. Emerging Technol. Learn. (iJET) 15(7), 149–155 (2020). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217084/. Accessed 15 Jan 2024

• Alharbi, W.: AI in the Foreign language classroom: a pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Educ. Res. Int. 2023 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

• Ayres-Bennett, W.: Codification and prescription in linguistic standardisation. Constructing Lang. Norms, Myths Emotions 13, 99 (2016)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bang, M., Vossoughi, S.: Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition Inst. 34(3), 173–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879

• Baratta, A.: Accent and linguistic prejudice within British teacher training. J. Lang. Identity Educ. 16(6), 416–423 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1359608

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barocas, S., Selbst, A.D.: Big data's disparate impact. California Law Rev., 671–732 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG31

• Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S.: On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610–623 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

• Bender, E.M., Koller, A.: Climbing towards NLU: on meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In: Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp. 5185–5198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463

• Ben-Simon, A., Bennett, R.E.: Towards more substantively meaningful automated essay scoring. J. Teach. Learn. Assessment 6(1), 4–44 (2007). http://www.jtla.org

• Bhardwaj, R., Majumder, N., Poria, S.: Investigating gender bias in bert. Cognitive Comput. 13(4), 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09881-2 (@021)

• Blattner, L., Nelson, S., Spiess, J.: Unpacking the Black Box: Regulating Algorithmic Decisions (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.03443

• Blodgett, S.L., Barocas, S., Daumé III, H., Wallach, H.: Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in nlp (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14050

• Bødker, S., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., Smith, R.C.: Participatory design. Synthesis Lectures Hum.-Centered Inform. 14(5), i–143 (2021)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, pp. 77–91. PMLR (2018)

  Google Scholar 

• Burgstahler, S.: Universal design: Implications for computing education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (TOCE) 11(3), 1–17 (2011)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burner, T.: Formative assessment of writing in English as a foreign language. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 60(6), 626–648 (2016)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Caliskan, A., Bryson, J.J., Narayanan, A.: Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356(6334), 183–186 (2017)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cardona, M.A., Rodríguez, R.J., Ishmael, K.: Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning. Office of Educational Technology (2023). https://tech.ed.gov/files/2023/05/ai-future-of-teaching-and-learning-report.pdf

• Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., Barro, S.: AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. Int. J. STEM Educ. 10(1), 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7

• Chan, M.P.Y., Choe, J., Li, A., Chen, Y., Gao, X., Holliday, N.: Training and typological bias in ASR performance for world Englishes. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (2022). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2022-10869

• Chang, D.H., Lin, M.P.C., Hajian, S., Wang, Q.Q.: Educational design principles of using AI chatbot that supports self-regulated learning in education: goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Sustainability 15(17), 12921 (2023)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen, K.H.: Ideologies of Language Standardization. In: The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Oxford University Press (2018)

  Google Scholar 

• Chien, Y.H., Yao, C.K.: Development of an ai userbot for engineering design education using an intent and flow combined framework. Appl. Sci. 10(22), 7970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227970

• Chiu, T.K.: The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interact. Learn. Environ., 1–17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

• Choudhury, M. Generative AI has a language problem. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1802–1803. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01716-4 (2023)

• Curzan, A.: Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge University Press (2014)

  Google Scholar 

• Cushing, I.: ‘Say it like the Queen’: the standard language ideology and language policy making in English primary schools. Lang. Culture Curriculum 34(3), 321–336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1840578

• Dalton, B., Proctor, C.P., Uccelli, P., Mo, E., Snow, C.E.: Designing for diversity: the role of reading strategies and interactive vocabulary in a digital reading environment for fifth-grade monolingual English and bilingual students. J. Literacy Res. 43(1), 68–100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X10397872

• Deane, P.: On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writing 18, 7–24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.002

• Delgado, F., Yang, S., Madaio, M., Yang, Q.: The participatory turn in ai design: Theoretical foundations and the current state of practice. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, pp. 1–23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3617694.3623261

• Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding (2018). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805

• DiChristofano, A., Shuster, H., Chandra, S., Patwari, N.: Performance disparities between accents in automatic speech recognition (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.01157

• Drake, G.: American Linguistic Prescriptivism: Its Decline and Revival in the 19th Century1. Lang. Soc. 6(3), 323–340 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005042

• Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.: Variation in evaluations of the (im) politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. J. Pragmat. 106, 1–19 (2016)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenstein, J., Prabhakaran, V., Rivera, C., Demszky, D., & Sharma, D. MD3: The Multi-Dialect Dataset of Dialogues. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.05527 (2023)

• Eubanks, V.: Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Martin’s Press, St (2018)

  Google Scholar 

• European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators, Publications Office of the European Union (2022). https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2766/153756

• Fine, M., et al.: Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-010

• Flores, N.: From academic language to language architecture: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies in research and practice. Theory Practice 59(1), 22–31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665411

• Gardner, J., O’Leary, M., Yuan, L.: Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: ‘Breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo?’ J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37(5), 1207–1216 (2021)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goyal, N., Kivlichan, I.D., Rosen, R., Vasserman, L.: Is your toxicity my toxicity? exploring the impact of rater identity on toxicity annotation. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1–28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3555088

• Graham, S., Hebert, M., Harris, K.R.: Formative assessment and writing: a meta-analysis. Elem. Sch. J. 115(4), 523–547 (2015)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gupta, A.: African-American English: Teacher beliefs, teacher needs and teacher preparation programs. Reading Matrix Int. Online J. 10(2) (2010). https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=teachinglearning_fac_pubs

• Gupta, A., Atef, Y., Mills, A., Bali, M.: Assistant, Parrot, or Colonizing Loudspeaker? ChatGPT Metaphors for Developing Critical AI Literacies (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.08711

• Gururangan, S., et al.: Whose language counts as high quality? measuring language ideologies in text data selection. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2562–2580, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.10474

• Haig, Y., Oliver, R.: Language variation and education: Teachers' perceptions. Lang. Educ. 17(4), 266–280 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666852

• Hannon, D., Danahy, E., Schneider, L., Coopey, E., Garber, G.: Encouraging teachers to adopt inquiry-based learning by engaging in participatory design. In: IEEE 2nd Integrated STEM Education Conference, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2012.6204169

• Heritage, M. Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press (2021)

  Google Scholar 

• Hong, J. Y., Kim, Y.: Development of AI data science education program to foster data literacy of elementary school students. J. Korean Assoc. Inform. Educ. 24(6), 633–641 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.6.633

• Horvath, B.M.: Australian English: Phonology. Varieties of English 3, 89–110 (2008)

  Google Scholar 

• Hovy, D., Yang, D.: The importance of modeling social factors of language: theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 588–602 (2021)

  Google Scholar 

• Hunt, V., Layton, D., Prince, S.: Diversity matters. McKinsey Company 1(1), 15–29 (2015)

  Google Scholar 

• Jackson, L., Kuhlman, C., Jackson, F., Fox, P.K.: Including vulnerable populations in the assessment of data from vulnerable populations. Front. Big Data 2, 19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00019

• Kauf, C., et al.: Event knowledge in large language models: the gap between the impossible and the unlikely. Cognitive Sci. 47(11), e13386 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13386

• Kendall, T., Farrington, C.: The corpus of regional African American language. Version 6, 1 (2018)

  Google Scholar 

• Kidd, M.A.: Archetypes, stereotypes and media representation in a multi-cultural society. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 236, 25–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.007

• Knesek, G.E.: Why Focusing on Grades Is a Barrier to Learning. Harvard Business Publishing: Education. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/why-focusing-on-grades-is-a-barrier-to-learning, 24 Apr 2022

• Koenecke, A., et al.: Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(14), 7684–7689 (2020)

  Google Scholar 

• Koh, E., Doroudi, S.: Learning, teaching, and assessment with generative artificial intelligence: towards a plateau of productivity. Learn. Res. Practice 9(2), 109–116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2264086

• Kotek, H., Dockum, R., Sun, D.: Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models. In: Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference, pp. 12–24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615599

• Krishnan, J., Black, R.W., Olson, C.B.: The power of context: exploring teachers’ formative assessment for online collaborative writing. Read. Writ. Q. 37(3), 201–220 (2021)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Krishnamurthy, P. Understanding data bias. Towards data science. https://towardsdatascience.com/survey-d4f168791e57 (2019, September 11)

• Kuhlman, C., Jackson, L., Chunara, R.: No computation without representation: avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.11836

• Kutlu, E., Tiv, M., Wulff, S., Titone, D.: The impact of race on speech perception and accentedness judgements in racially diverse and non-diverse groups. Appl. Linguis. 43(5), 867–890 (2022)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kurinec, C.A., Weaver, C.A.: III Dialect on trial: use of African American Vernacular English influences juror appraisals. Psychol. Crime Law 25(8), 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1597086 (2019)

• Lachney, M.: Computational communities: African-American cultural capital in computer science education. Comput. Sci. Educ. 27(3–4), 175–196 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1429062

• Larimore, S., Kennedy, I., Haskett, B., Arseniev-Koehler, A.: Reconsidering annotator disagreement about racist language: Noise or signal? In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, pp. 81–90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.socialnlp-1.7

• Lawton, R., de Kleine, C.: The need to dismantle “standard” language ideology at the community college: an analysis of writing and literacy instructor attitudes. J. College Reading Learn. 50(4), 197–219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938

• Lee, I., Ali, S., Zhang, H., DiPaola, D., Breazeal, C.: Developing middle school students' AI literacy. In: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 191–197 (2021)

  Google Scholar 

• Lee, K.J., et al.: The show must go on: a conceptual model of conducting synchronous participatory design with children online. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445715

• Lee, I., Ali, S., Zhang, H., DiPaola, D., Breazeal, C.: Developing middle school students' AI literacy. In: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 191–197 (2021). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3408877.3432513

• Lee, H., Chung, H.Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., Warschauer, M.: The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: a systematic review. Appl. Measur. Educ. 33(2), 124–140 (2020)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, C.D.: The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: how an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educ. Res. 37(5), 267 (2008)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., Zou, J.: GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02819

• Lindquist, H., Levin, M.: Apples and oranges: on comparing data from different corpora. In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, pp. 201–213. Brill (2000). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004490758_017

• Lippi-Green, R.: English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge (2012)

  Google Scholar 

• Liu, C. C., Koto, F., Baldwin, T., Gurevych, I.: Are multilingual llms culturally-diverse reasoners? an investigation into multicultural proverbs and sayings (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08591

• Long, D., Magerko, B.: What is AI literacy? competencies and design considerations. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

• Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., du Boulay, B.: Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 3, 100076 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076

• Maghbouleh, N., Schachter, A., Flores, R.D.: Middle Eastern and North African Americans may not be perceived, nor perceive themselves, to be White. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(7) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117940119 (2022)

• Markl, N.: Language variation and algorithmic bias: understanding algorithmic bias in British English automatic speech recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 521–534 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533117

• Martin, J.L., Tang, K.: Understanding racial disparities in automatic speech recognition: the case of habitual “be”. In: Interspeech, pp. 626–630 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2893

• Martin, J.L., Wright, K.E.: Bias in automatic speech recognition: The case of African American language. Appl. Linguist. 44(4), 613–630 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac066

• Mason, M., Carson-Berndsen, J.: Investigating phoneme similarity with artificially accented speech. In: Proceedings of the 20th SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, pp. 49–57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07389

• McNamara, D.S., et al.: The Writing-Pal: Natural language algorithms to support intelligent tutoring on writing strategies. In: K-12 Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pp. 780–793. IGI Global (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4502-8.ch045

• Milios, A., BehnamGhader, P.: An analysis of social biases present in bert variants across multiple languages (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14402

• Milroy, J.: Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. J. Sociolinguistics 5(4), 530–555 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163

• Milroy, L.: Standard English and language ideology in Britain and the United States. In: Standard English, pp. 173–206. Routledge (2002)

  Google Scholar 

• Milroy, J.: The ideology of the standard. The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics 133 (2007)

  Google Scholar 

• Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., Zhang, H.: AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2021). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709

• Moore, B.: Speaking our language: the story of Australian English, pp. 97–8. Melbourne: Oxford University Press (2008)

  Google Scholar 

• Mozafari, M., Farahbakhsh, R., Crespi, N.: Hate speech detection and racial bias mitigation in social media based on BERT model. PloS one 15(8), e0237861 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237861

• Munro, M.J.: Listening to the “noise” in the data: the critical importance of individual differences in second-language speech. J. Second Lang. Pronunciation (2023). https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.23029.mun

• Nekoto, W., et al.: Participatory research for low-resourced machine translation: a case study in african languages (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.02353

• Ocumpaugh, J., Roscoe, R.D., Baker, R.S., et al.: Toward asset-based instruction and assessment in artificial intelligence in education. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00382-x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O'Neil, C.: Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown (2017)

  Google Scholar 

• Paris, D., Winn, M.T. (eds.): Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Sage Publications (2013)

  Google Scholar 

• Parks, A.N.: Metaphors of hierarchy in mathematics education discourse: the narrow path. J. Curriculum Stud. 42(1), 79–97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903167743

• Patel, L.: Decolonizing Educational Research : From Ownership to Answerability. Routledge, NewYork (2015)

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Pater, J., Coupe, A., Pfafman, R., Phelan, C., Toscos, T., Jacobs, M.: Standardizing reporting of participant compensation in HCI: a systematic literature review and recommendations for the field. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445734

• Peng, H., Ma, S., Spector, J.M.: Personalized adaptive learning: an emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learn. Environ. 6(1), 1–14 (2019)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pham, N., Pham, L., Meyers, A.L.: Towards Better Inclusivity: A Diverse Tweet Corpus of English Varieties (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.11487

• Pierre, J., Crooks, R., Currie, M., Paris, B., Pasquetto, I.: Getting Ourselves Together: Data-centered participatory design research & epistemic burden. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445103

• Plank, B.: The ‘Problem’ of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluation (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02570

• Preston, D.R.: The cognitive foundations of language regard. Poznan Stud. Contemporary Linguist. 53(1), 17–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2017-0002

• Prinsloo, P.: Of ‘black boxes’ and algorithmic decision-making in (higher) education–a commentary. Big Data & Soc. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933994 (2020)

• Reyero Lobo, P., Daga, E., Alani, H., Fernandez, M.: Semantic Web technologies and bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic literature review. Semantic Web 14(4), 745–770 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-223041

• Rose, H., Galloway, N.: Debating standard language ideology in the classroom: Using the ‘Speak Good English Movement’to raise awareness of global Englishes. RELC J. 48(3), 294–301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216684281

• Roscoe, R.D., McNamara, D.S.: Writing Pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(4), 1010–1025 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032340

• Santiago, H., Martin, J., Moeller, S., Tang, K.: Disambiguation of morpho-syntactic features of African American English--the case of habitual be (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.1242

• Scott, K.A., Sheridan, K.M., Clark, K.: Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited. Learn. Media Technol. 40(4), 412–436 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924966

• Silaj, K.M., Frangiyyeh, A., Paquette‐Smith, M.: The impact of multimedia design and the accent of the instructor on student learning and evaluations of teaching. Applied Cognitive Psychology (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4143

• Silber Mohamed, H., Farris, E.M.: ‘Bad hombres’? an examination of identities in US media coverage of immigration. J. Ethnic Migration Stud. 46(1), 158–176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1574221

• Slota, S.C., et al.: Good systems, bad data? interpretations of AI hype and failures. Proc Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(1), e275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.275

• Snell, J.: Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Lang. Educ. 27(2), 110–128 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.760584

• Spence, J. L., Hornsey, M.J., Stephenson, E.M., Imuta, K.: Is Your Accent Right for the Job? A Meta-Analysis on Accent Bias in Hiring Decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221130595

• Strickland, C.L., Young, S.: Dialect bias in questioning styles in the standard English classroom. In: Presented at Annual Research Forum (Winston-Salem, NC, December 1999), p. 121

  Google Scholar 

• Tan, S., Joty, S., Varshney, L.R., Kan, M.Y.: Mind your inflections! Improving NLP for non-standard Englishes with Base-Inflection Encoding (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.14870

• Teng, L.S.: Explicit strategy-based instruction in L2 writing contexts: a perspective of self-regulated learning and formative assessment. Assess. Writ. 53, 100645 (2022)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, N.A., Weiss, D.A.: A framework for the development of computerized adaptive tests. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 16(1), 1 (2019)

  Google Scholar 

• Trudgill, P., Hannah, J.: International English: A guide to the varieties of standard English. Routledge (2013)

  Google Scholar 

• Tuck, E., Yang, K.W.: Decolonization is not a metaphor. Tabula Rasa (38), 61–111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n38.04

• Van der Linden, W.J., Glas, C.A. (eds.): Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media. (2000)

  Google Scholar 

• Vakil, S., McKinney de Royston, M., Suad Nasir, N.I., Kirshner, B.: Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition Instruction 34(3), 194–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817

• Walsh, J.A.: Natural language processing in educational contexts: opportunities and potential pitfalls (Doctoral dissertation) (2022)

  Google Scholar 

• Wassink, A.B., Gansen, C., Bartholomew, I.: Uneven success: automatic speech recognition and ethnicity-related dialects. Speech Commun. 140, 50–70 (2022)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, J., Huang, Y., Palermo, C., Beard, G., MacArthur, C.A.: Automated feedback and automated scoring in the elementary grades: Usage, attitudes, and associations with writing outcomes in a districtwide implementation of MI Write. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 31(2), 234–276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00236-w

• Wingate, U.: The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. In: Approaches to Assessment that Enhance Learning in Higher Education, pp. 29–43. Routledge (2014)

  Google Scholar 

• Wolf, M.J., Miller, K., Grodzinsky, F.S.: Why we should have seen that coming: comments on Microsoft's tay “experiment,” and wider implications. ACM Sigcas Comput. Soc. 47(3), 54–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3144592.3144598

• Yin, W., Agarwal, V., Jiang, A., Zubiaga, A., Sastry, N.: Annobert: effectively representing multiple annotators’ label choices to improve hate speech detection. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 17, pp. 902–913 (2023)

  Google Scholar 

• Yu, C., Jeoung, S., Kasi, A., Yu, P., Ji, H.: Unlearning bias in language models by partitioning gradients. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pp. 6032–6048 (2023). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.375

• Zavala, M.: What do we mean by decolonizing research strategies? Lessons from decolonizing, Indigenous research projects in New Zealand and Latin America (2013)

  Google Scholar 

Download references