Abstract
The vulnerable part of our ever-changing socio-technical challenges in a dynamic environment such as maritime berthing operations is frequently the human and our intrinsic cognitive limitations. Human factors and human error have historically been, and still are, attributed as contributing factors to accidents and incidents in the maritime domain [1]. This study utilizes Goal-directed task analysis (GDTA) along with a qualitative research framework to explore complex situational awareness (SA) and decision-making during maritime berthing operations. Many theoretical frameworks have been developed by researchers to understand how human cognitive functions in a dynamic and constantly changing environment [2–5]. Endsley’s research framework was selected for this study based on its suitability, superiority, and applicability. Secondary research questions were also modeled and investigated to complement a more holistic understanding of the complex phenomena of situation awareness in the maritime domain. Utilizing non-probabilistic sampling, five experienced deck officers were interviewed using a semi-structured framework interview guide. The interview transcripts were analyzed using NVivo software. Findings showed 117 level 1 (perception), 32 level 2 (comprehension) and 15 level 3 (projection) information requirements. Secondary research showcased the top 3 factors negatively impact an individual’s SA are noise, wrongfully assessing external factors, and distractions. Effective communication, mutual understanding of tasks, and sharing of relative information were identified to be crucial factors in ensuring cooperation within the ship’s bridge team and improving situation awareness. The navigator’s reliance on information varies based on factors like experience, task clarity, and familiarity with equipment. The findings reinforce available literature, while the secondary research questions justify need for further research. Overall, the theory of individual and shared SA is not only reinforced but also subtly broadened by this study, proving its applicability in maritime operations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grech, M.R., Horberry, T.J., Koester, T.: Human Factors in the Maritime Domain, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2019)
Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 32–64 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
Smith, K., Hancock, P.A.: Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Hum. Factors 37(1), 137–148 (1995)
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D.: Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 10(1), 43–68 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220802045199
Wickens, C.D.: Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11(4), 128–133 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00184
Coraddu, A., Oneto, L., de Maya, B.N., Kurt, R.: Determining the most influential human factors in maritime accidents: a data-driven approach. Ocean Eng. 211, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107588
Xue, J., Van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., Reniers, G., Papadimitriou, E., Wu, C.: Multi-attribute decision-making method for prioritizing maritime traffic safety influencing factors of autonomous ships ‘maneuvering decisions using grey and fuzzy theories’. Saf. Sci. 120, 323–340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.019
Wrόbel, K.: Searching for the origins of the myth: 80% human error impact on maritime safety. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 216, 107942 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107942
Tikkanen, A.: Titanic—Aftermath of Titanic sinking | Britannica. Britannica (1999). https://www.britannica.com/topic/Titanic
Hetherington, C., Flin, R., Mearns, K.: Safety in shipping: the human element. J. Safety Res. 37(4), 401–411 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007
Smith-Solbakken, M.: Torrey Canyon-ulykken. In: Store norske leksikon. (2022). http://snl.no/Torrey_Canyon-ulykken
Sharma, A., Nazir, S., Ernstsen, J.: Situation awareness information requirements for maritime navigation: a goal directed task analysis. Saf. Sci. 120, 745–752 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.016
Cordon, J.R., Mestre, J.M., Walliser, J.: Human factors in seafaring: the role of situation awareness. Saf. Sci. 93, 256–265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.001
Sánchez-Beaskoetxea, J., Basterretxea-Iribar, I., Sotés, I., Machado, M.de lasM.M.: Human error in marine accidents: is the crew normally to blame? Marit. Transp. Res. 2, 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100016
Baker, C.C., McCafferty, D.B.: Accident database review of human element concerns: what do the results mean for classification? Abs technical papers 2005, pp. 1–8 (2005)
Saus, E.-R., Johnsen, B.H., Eid, J., Thayer, J.F.: Who benefits from simulator training: personality and heart rate variability in relation to situation awareness during navigation training. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(4), 1262–1268 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.009
Endsley, M.R., Jones, D.G.: Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)
Hansen, M.A.: A Goal-Directed Task Analysis (GDTA) of Maritime Berthing Operations (Master’s thesis). University of South-Eastern Norway Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences (2022)
Sandhåland, H., Oltedal, H., Eid, J.: Situation awareness in bridge operations – a study of collisions between attendant vessels and offshore facilities in the North Sea. Saf. Sci. 79, 277–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.021
Endsley, M.R.: Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proc. Hum. Factors Soc. Ann. Meet. 32(2), 97–101 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128803200221
Tan, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, J.: Assessing the potential impacts of connected vehicle systems on Driver’s situation awareness and driving performance. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 84, 177–193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.016
Jones, D.G., Endsley, M.R.: Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 67(6). https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/
Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D.P., Shrestha, L.: Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 123–136 (1995)
Endsley, M.R., Jones, W.M.: A Model of Inter and Intra-team Situation Awareness: Implications for Design, Training and Measurement. New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Environments (2001)
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., DeWaard, J.: Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 8th edn. Worth Publishers, New York (2015)
Jacobsen, D.I.: Hvordan gjennomføre undersøkelser? 3rd edn. Cappelen Damm Akademisk (2018)
Dalland, O.: Metode og oppgaveskriving, 6th edn. Gyldendal Akademisk (2017)
Acknowledgement
This article is based on the thesis titled “A Goal-Directed Task Analysis (GDTA) of Maritime Berthing Operations”, written by the first author; Markus A. Hansen, accessible at the university of southeastern - USN archives. The second author would like to acknowledge the support of the project “Enhancing Human Performance in the Complex Socio-technical Systems (ENHANCE)” funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 823904.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hansen, M., Nazir, S. (2024). Situational Awareness and Decision-Making in Maritime Operations: A Cognitive Perspective. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14692. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60728-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60728-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60727-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60728-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)