GAMAI, an AI-Powered Programming Exercise Gamifier Tool

1. Bauer, Y., Leal, J.P., Queirós, R.: Can a content management system provide a good user experience to teachers? In: 4th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2023). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), vol. 112, pp. 4:1–4:8. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany (2023)

   Google Scholar 

2. Botte, B., Bakkes, S., Veltkamp, R.: Motivation in gamification: constructing a correlation between gamification achievements and self-determination theory. In: Marfisi-Schottman, I., Bellotti, F., Hamon, L., Klemke, R. (eds.) GALA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12517, pp. 157–166. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63464-3_15

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

3. Brooks, J.J.: Touching Tales for Touchy Topics? Engaging Contentious Issues Through Narrative Persuasion. Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University (2023)

   Google Scholar 

4. Hosseini, R., et al.: Improving engagement in program construction examples for learning python programming. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 30(2), 299–336 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Jacobsen, L.J., Weber, K.E.: The promises and pitfalls of ChatGPT as a feedback provider in higher education: an exploratory study of prompt engineering and the quality of AI-driven feedback (2023). https://osf.io/cr257/download. Accessed 25 Mar 2024

6. Kao, G.Y.M., Ruan, C.A.: Designing and evaluating a high interactive augmented reality system for programming learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 132, 107245 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Kurdi, G., Leo, J., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Al-Emari, S.: A systematic review of automatic question generation for educational purposes. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 30 (2019)

   Google Scholar 

8. Paiva, J.C., Queirós, R., Leal, J.P., Swacha, J., Miernik, F.: Managing gamified programming courses with the FGPE platform. Information 13(2), 45 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Saleem, A.N., Noori, N.M., Ozdamli, F.: Gamification applications in e-learning: a literature review. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 27(1), 139–159 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Sarsa, S., Denny, P., Hellas, A., Leinonen, J.: Automatic generation of programming exercises and code explanations using large language models. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, vol. 1, pp. 27–43. ICER 2022, Lugano, Switzerland (2022)

    Google Scholar 

11. Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., Thiebes, S., Warsinsky, S.L., Petter, S., Sunyaev, A.: Narrative transportation in gamified information systems: the role of narrative-task congruence. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–9 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

12. Strijbol, N., et al.: Tested - an educational testing framework with language-agnostic test suites for programming exercises. SoftwareX 22, 101404 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Swacha, J., Szydlowska, J.A.: Does gamification make a difference in programming education?: Evaluating FGPE-supported learning outcomes. Educ. Sci., 1–11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100984

14. Ta, N.B.D., Nguyen, H.G.P., Swapna, G.: ExGen: ready-to-use exercise generation in introductory programming courses. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computers in Education Conference, pp. 1–10. Matsue, Shimane, Japan (2023)

    Google Scholar 

15. Zavala, L., Mendoza, B.: On the use of semantic-based AIG to automatically generate programming exercises. In: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 14–19. SIGCSE ’18, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

16. Zeng, J., Parks, S., Shang, J.: To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: a review of educational games. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2(2), 186–195 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references