Abstract
Business Process Management (BPM) takes care of the business process (BP) lifecycle using different technologies in organizations to provide value-added services or products for end-users. Although today’s fast-changing business world poses vast variants of business processes (BPs) alongside uncertainty. This situation requires an agile BPM to manage, maintain, and execute different variants of a BP as well as deal with uncertainties and changes. One of the emphasises of agile BPM is involving stakeholders in the BP lifecycle, which requires a standard approach for all stakeholders to have quick and efficient access to the BP lifecycle to prevent problems like cultural resistance. In order to reach a standard approach, social BPM is an emerging concept that can help the easy and efficient involvement of stakeholders in the BP lifecycle. By inspiring form social BPM, this paper propose a new social media-based BPM platform to deal with different varieties of BP and uncertainties by integrating stakeholders in the BP lifecycle. While the platform eases communication, information exchange, and decision-making among stakeholders; it also eliminates the exchange between design-time and run-time while a change occurs by merging design-time and run-time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. Int. Scholarly Res. Not. 2013 (2013)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. Cooperative Information Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
Ariouat, H., Hanachi, C., Andonoff, E., Bénaben, F.: A conceptual framework for social business process management. In: Zanni-Merk, C., Frydman, C.S., Toro, C., Hicks, Y., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference KES-2017, Marseille, France, 6–8 September 2017. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 112, pp. 703–712. Elsevier (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.151
Badakhshan, P., Conboy, K., Grisold, T., vom Brocke, J.: Agile business process management: a systematic literature review and an integrated framework. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 26(6), 1505–1523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2018-0347
Barthe-Delanoë, A.M., Montarnal, A., Truptil, S., Benaben, F., Pingaud, H.: Towards the agility of collaborative workflows through an event driven approach. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 28, 214–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.029. https://hal-mines-albi.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01724575
Barthe-Delanoë, A., Truptil, S., Bénaben, F., Pingaud, H.: Event-driven agility of interoperability during the run-time of collaborative processes. Decis. Support Syst. 59, 171–179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.11.005
Bénaben, F., Mu, W., Boissel-Dallier, N., Barthe-Delanoë, A., Zribi, S., Pingaud, H.: Supporting interoperability of collaborative networks through engineering of a service-based mediation information system (MISE 2.0). Enterp. Inf. Syst. 9(5–6), 556–582 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2014.928949
vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Handbook on Business Process Management 2, Strategic Alignment, Governance, People and Culture, 2nd edn. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4
Bruno, G., et al.: Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software. J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract. 23(4), 297–326 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.523
Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4
Gong, Y., Janssen, M.: Agent-based simulation for evaluating flexible and agile business processes: separating knowledge rules, process rules and information resources. In: Barjis, J. (ed.) EOMAS 2010. LNBIP, vol. 63, pp. 41–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15723-3_4
Kocbek, M., Jošt, G., Polančič, G.: Introduction to social business process management. In: Uden, L., Heričko, M., Ting, I.-H. (eds.) KMO 2015. LNBIP, vol. 224, pp. 425–437. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_33
Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: lessons from experience. MIS Q. 22(3), 363–408 (1998). https://misq.org/an-empirical-investigation-of-information-technology-sourcing-practices-lessons-from-experience.html
Pichler, P., Weber, B., Zugal, S., Pinggera, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Imperative versus declarative process modeling languages: an empirical investigation. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 383–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_37
Prodanova, J., Looy, A.V.: How beneficial is social media for business process management? A systematic literature review. IEEE Access 7, 39583–39599 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903983
Thiemich, C., Puhlmann, F.: An agile BPM project methodology. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 291–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_25
Weske, M.: Business Process Management - Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2
Zhang, D.: Web services composition for process management in e-business. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 45(2), 83–91 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2005.11645834. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2005.11645834
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eidgahi, M.M., Araghi, S.N., Bork, D., Barthe-Delanoë, AM., Mace-Ramete, G., Benaben, F. (2024). A Social BPM Approach to Deal with Agility. In: Chbeir, R., Benslimane, D., Zervakis, M., Manolopoulos, Y., Ngyuen, N.T., Tekli, J. (eds) Management of Digital EcoSystems. MEDES 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51643-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51643-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51642-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51643-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)