Struggle for Visibility: Mobilizing Dormant Logic on Social Media Platforms

1. Boell, S., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 1 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

2. Boone, C., et al.: How are competing logics combined in managerial teams? the impact of branch founding team hybridity on the growth of Islamic bank branches in Turkey, 2002–19. J. Manag. Stud. 59(6), 1460–1492 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Boone, C., Özcan, S.: Oppositional logics and the antecedents of hybridization: a country-level study of the diffusion of islamic banking windows, 1975–2017. Organ. Sci. 31(4), 990–1011 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Curchod, C., et al.: Working for an algorithm: power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Adm. Sci. Q. (2019)

   Google Scholar 

5. Currie, G., Spyridonidis, D.: Interpretation of multiple institutional logics on the ground: actors’ position, their agency and situational constraints in professionalized contexts. Organ. Stud. 37(1), 77–97 (2016)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Cutolo, D., Kenney, M.: Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 35(4), 584–605 (2021)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Dalpiaz, E., et al.: Combining logics to transform organizational agency: blending industry and Art at Alessi. Adm. Sci. Q. 61(3), 347–392 (2016)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. van Dijck, J., et al.: The Platform Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)

   Book  Google Scholar 

9. Gerbaudo, P.: From data analytics to data hermeneutics. online political discussions, digital methods and the continuing relevance of interpretive approaches. Digit. Cult. Soc. 2(2), 95–112 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

10. Gray, K.L., Stein, K.: We ‘said her name’ and got zucked: black women calling-out the carceral logics of digital platforms. Gend. Soc. 35(4), 538–545 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hanson, K.R.: Collective exclusion: how white heterosexual dating app norms reproduce status quo hookup culture. Sociol. Inq. 92(S1), 894–918 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Hedberg, L.M., Lounsbury, M.: Not just small potatoes: cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organ. Sci. 32(2), 433–454 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Jaskiewicz, P., et al.: To be or not to be: how family firms manage family and commercial logics in succession. Entrep. Theory Pract. 40(4), 781–813 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Le Loarne-Lemaire, S., et al.: Becoming a green entrepreneur: an advanced entrepreneurial cognition model based on a practiced-based approach. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 18(2), 801–828 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Mees-Buss, J., et al.: From templates to heuristics: how and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 25(2), 405–429 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Mickey, E.L.: When gendered logics collide: going public and restructuring in a high-tech organization. Gend. Soc. 33(4), 509–533 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Ogbor, J.O.: Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. J. Manag. Stud. 37(5), 605–635 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Perkmann, M., et al.: Protecting scientists from gordon Gekko: how organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics. Organ. Sci. 30(2), 298–318 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Rahman, H.A.: The invisible cage: workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Adm. Sci. Q. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

20. Reay, T., Hinings, C.R.: Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ. Stud. 30(6), 629–652 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Rodriguez, J.K., et al.: The theory and praxis of intersectionality in work and organisations: where do we go from here? Gend. Work Organ. 23(3), 201–222 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Romele, A., et al.: Digital hermeneutics: from interpreting with machines to interpretational machines. AI Soc. 35(1), 73–86 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Romero, M., Valdez, Z.: Introduction to the special issue: intersectionality and entrepreneurship. Ethn. Racial Stud. 39(9), 1553–1565 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Schou, P.K.: Coming apart while scaling up – adoption of logics and the fragmentation of organizational identity in science-based ventures. J. Manag. Stud. 60(3), 688–721 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Song, H.-C.: How buddhist monks use historical narratives to delegitimize a dominant institutional logic: the case of a Korean buddhist organizational field, 1910–1962. J. Manag. Inq. 10564926221099424 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

26. York, J.G., et al.: Converging winds: logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Acad. Manage. J. 59(2), 579–610 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Zhu, Y., et al.: Practice-based wisdom theory for integrating institutional logics: a new model for social entrepreneurship learning and education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 15(3), 607–625 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references