Human-AI Collaboration in Public Services: The Case of Sick Leave Case Handling

1. McCarthy, J.J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., Shannon, C.E.: A Proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Mag. 27(4), 12 (2006)

   Google Scholar 

2. Meske, C., Bunde, E., Schneider, J., Gersch, M.: Explainable artificial intelligence: objectives, stakeholders, and future research opportunities. Inf. Syst. Manag. 39(1), 53–63 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Park, S.Y., et al.: Identifying challenges and opportunities in human-AI collaboration in healthcare. In: Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 506–510 (2019)

   Google Scholar 

4. Benbunan-Fich, R., Desouza, K.C., Andersen, K.V.: IT-enabled innovation in the public sector: introduction to the special issue. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 323–328 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Eggers, W., Fishman, T., Kishnani, P.: AI-Augmented Human Services: Using Cognitive Technologies to Transform Program Delivery (2017)

   Google Scholar 

6. Vassilakopoulou, P., Haug, A., Salvesen, L.M., Pappas, I.O.: Developing human/AI interactions for chat-based customer services: lessons learned from the Norwegian government. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 10–22 (2023)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.: Artificial Intelligence for Decision-Making and the Future of Work (2023)

   Google Scholar 

8. Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O.: Artificial intelligence (AI) and information systems: perspectives to responsible AI. Inf. Syst. Front. 25(1), 1–7 (2023)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Vassilakopoulou, P., Parmiggiani, E., Shollo, A., Grisot, M.: Responsible AI: Concepts, critical perspectives and an Information Systems research agenda. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 34(2), 3 (2022)

   Google Scholar 

10. Akbari, P., Pappas, I., Vassilakopoulou, P.: Justice as Fairness: a hierarchical framework of responsible AI principles. In: ECIS 2023 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

11. Wang, D., et al.: From Human-Human Collaboration to Human-AI Collaboration (2020)

    Google Scholar 

12. McKinsey: Forging the Human–Machine Alliance (2022)

    Google Scholar 

13. Velsberg, O., Westergren, U.H., Jonsson, K.: Exploring smartness in public sector innovation – creating smart public services with the Internet of Things. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 350–368 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Schmager, S., Vassilakopoulou, P., Grøder, C., Parmiggiani, E., Pappas, I.: What do citizens think of AI adoption in public services? Exploratory research on citizen attitudes through a social contract lens. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS Conference Office, vol. 436, pp. 4472–4481 (2023). ISBN 978-0-9981331-6-4

    Google Scholar 

15. Woods, D.D.: Cognitive technologies: the design of joint human-machine cognitive systems. AI Mag. 6(4), 86–92 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

16. Balakrishnan, J., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience. Psychol. Mark. 38(4), 643–668 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Ijtsma, M., Ma, L.M., Pritchett, A.R., Feigh, K.M.: Computational methodology for the allocation of work and interaction in human-robot teams. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 13(4), 221–241 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Stowers, K., Kasdaglis, N., Rupp, M., Chen, J., Barber, D., Barnes, M.: Insights into human-agent teaming: intelligent agent transparency and uncertainty, in advances in human factors in robots and unmanned systems. In: Savage-Knepshield, P., Chen, J. (eds.) Springer International Publishing, pp. 149–160 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

19. Marathe, A.R., Schaefer, K.E., Evans, A.W., Metcalfe, J.S.: Bidirectional communication for effective human-agent teaming, in virtual, augmented and mixed reality: interaction, navigation, visualization, embodiment, and simulation. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds.) Springer International Publishing, pp. 338–350 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

20. Xu, W., Gao, Z.: Applying human-centered AI in developing effective human-AI teaming: A perspective of human-AI joint cognitive systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03913 (2023)

21. Schmager, S., Pappas, I., Vassilakopoulou, P.: Defining Human-centered AI: a comprehensive review of HCAI literature. In: Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2023 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

22. Nav, Hva er NAV? – nav.no. (2023)

    Google Scholar 

23. Jensen, M.V., Lyngstad, C.P.: Innspill til strategi for kunstig intelligens (2019)

    Google Scholar 

24. Fineide, M.J., Hansen, G.V., Haug, E.: How does a new working method in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Organization (NAV) succeed in reducing sick leave rates? Int. J. Integr. Care 19(4), 169 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Neuhoff, R., Simeone, L., Laursen, L.H.: Exploring how design-driven foresight can support strategic thinking in relation to sustainability and circular policy making. In: European Academy of Design Conference: Safe Harbours. The European Academy of Design (2021)

    Google Scholar 

26. Ramos, J., Sweeney, J.A., Peach, K., Smith, L.: Our futures: by the people, for the people. NESTA, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

27. Inayatullah, S.: Methods and Epistemologies in Futures Studies, Knowledge Base of Futures Studies, 1st edn. Foresight International, Brisbane (2000)

    Google Scholar 

28. Oates, B.J., Griffiths, M., McLean, R.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage Publications Limited (2022)

    Google Scholar 

29. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Castleberry, A., Nolen, A.: Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: is it as easy as it sounds? Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. 10(6), 807–815 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Guest, G., Mclellan, E.: Distinguishing the trees from the forest: applying cluster analysis to thematic qualitative data. Field Methods 15(2), 186–201 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Richards, T., et al.: Using hierarchical categories in qualitative data analysis. In: Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Practice, pp. 80–95 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

33. Young, M.R., Bullock, J.B., Lecy, J.D.: Artificial discretion as a tool of governance: a framework for understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on public administration. Perspect. Public Manag. Governance 2, 301–313 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

34. Vassilakopoulou, P., Grisot, M.: Effectual tactics in digital intrapreneurship: a process model. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 29(3), 101617 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Opland, L.E., Pappas, I.O., Engesmo, J., Jaccheri, L.: Employee-driven digital innovation: a systematic review and a research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 143, 255–271 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Gayialis, S.P., Papadopoulos, G.A., Ponis, S.T., Vassilakopoulou, P., Tatsiopoulos, I.P.: Integrating process modeling and simulation with benchmarking using a business process management system for local government. Int. J. Comput. Theory Eng. 8(6), 482 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Kempton, A.M., Parmiggiani, E., Vassilakopoulou, P.: Accountability in Managing Artificial Intelligence: State of the Art and a way forward for Information Systems Research (2023)

    Google Scholar 

38. United Nations: Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals – United Nations Sustainable Development. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

39. Schmager, S.: From commercial agreements to the social contract: human-centered AI guidelines for public services. In: Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2022 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references