Abstract
Online courses in higher education have gained popularity, but students struggle with self-regulation in online learning. The absence of traditional classroom guidance due to limited educator oversight highlights the need for effective student profiling. Existing profiling methods focus on non-university contexts with data-rich platforms, leaving platforms like Moodle at a disadvantage. In this paper, we explore the creation of useful student profiles with limited data, often found in Moodle and similar platforms. We propose to adopt a clustering method based on eight key self-regulation variables: revision, progress, consistency, dedication, regularity, focus, and practicality. Across diverse online university courses, our experiments show that our approach effectively identifies meaningful profiles, even with limited data. These profiles also reveal unique demographics, providing insights into online learning behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
SCORM stands for Sharable Content Object Reference Model, and it is a set of standards and specifications for creating and packaging e-learning content. A SCORM package typically includes a collection of web-based learning resources (such as presentations, quizzes, and simulations) that adhere to the SCORM standards.
References
Barthakur, A., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Siemens, G., Richey, M.C., Dawson, S.: Assessing program-level learning strategies in Moocs. Comput. Hum. Behav. 117, 106674 (2021)
Boroujeni, M.S., Sharma, K., Kidziński, Ł, Lucignano, L., Dillenbourg, P.: How to quantify student’s regularity? In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) Adaptive and Adaptable Learning, pp. 277–291. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_21
Cho, M.-H., Cheon, J., Lim, S.: Preservice teachers’ motivation profiles, self-regulation, and affective outcomes in online learning. Dist. Ed. 42(1), 37–54 (2021)
Cho, M.-H., Shen, D.: Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Educ. 34(3), 290–301 (2013)
Chunkhare, M., Jadhav, S.: “online learning” technology solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study of medical technology and allied healthcare student perceptions. Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ. 13(1), 1–11 (2023)
Corrin, L., de Barba, P.G., Bakharia, A.: Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In Proc. of LAK 2017, 424–428 (2017)
Fenu, G., Galici, R.: Modelling student behavior in synchronous online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic (2021)
Hew, K.F., Qiao, C., Tang, Y.: Understanding student engagement in large-scale open online courses: a machine learning facilitated analysis of student’s reflections in 18 highly rated MOOCs. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19(3) (2018)
Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: Clustering patterns of engagement in massive open online courses (MOOCs): the use of learning analytics to reveal student categories. J. Comput. High. Educ. 29(1), 114–132 (2017)
Kotsiantis, S.B., Pierrakeas, C.J., Pintelas, P.E.: Preventing student dropout in distance learning using machine learning techniques. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pp. 267–274. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45226-3_37
Likas, A., Vlassis, N., Verbeek, J.J.: The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recogn. 36(2), 451–461 (2003)
M. Marras, J. T. T. Vignoud, and T. Käser. Can feature predictive power generalize? benchmarking early predictors of student success across flipped and online courses. In: Proceedings of EDM 2021 (2021)
Matcha, W., Gašević, D., Uzir, N.A., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A.: Analytics of learning strategies: Associations with academic performance and feedback. In Proc. of LAK 2019, 461–470 (2019)
Pardo, A., Gašević, D., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Mirriahi, N.: Exploring student interactions with preparation activities in a flipped classroom experience. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(3), 333–346 (2018)
Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. of Comp. and App. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)
Saint, J., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Gasevic, D., Pardo, A.: Trace-srl: a framework for analysis of microlevel processes of self-regulated learning from trace data. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 13(4), 861–877 (2020)
Sher, V., Hatala, M., Gasevic, D.: Analyzing the consistency in within-activity learning patterns in blended learning. In: Proceedings of LAK, pp. 1–10 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fenu, G., Galici, R., Marras, M. (2024). Data-Efficient Student Profiling in Online Courses. In: Palomba, F., Gravino, C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence with and for Learning Sciences. Past, Present, and Future Horizons. WAILS 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14545. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57402-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57402-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57401-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57402-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)