Abstract
Screening documents is a tedious and time-consuming aspect of high-recall retrieval tasks, such as compiling a systematic literature review, where the goal is to identify all relevant documents for a topic. To help streamline this process, many Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) methods leverage active learning techniques to reduce the number of documents requiring review. BERT-based models have shown high effectiveness in text classification, leading to interest in their potential use in TAR workflows. In this paper, we investigate recent work that examined the impact of further pre-training epochs on the effectiveness and efficiency of a BERT-based active learning pipeline. We first report that we could replicate the original experiments on two specific TAR datasets, confirming some of the findings: importantly, that further pre-training is critical to high effectiveness, but requires attention in terms of selecting the correct training epoch. We then investigate the generalisability of the pipeline on a different TAR task, that of medical systematic reviews. In this context, we show that there is no need for further pre-training if a domain-specific BERT backbone is used within the active learning pipeline. This finding provides practical implications for using the studied active learning pipeline within domain-specific TAR tasks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, K., Luong, M.T., Le, Q.V., Manning, C.D.: Electra: pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10555 (2020)
Cormack, G.V., Grossman, M.R.: Evaluation of machine-learning protocols for technology-assisted review in electronic discovery. In: Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 153–162 (2014)
Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)
Grossman, M.R., Cormack, G.V.: Technology-assisted review in e-discovery can be more effective and more efficient than exhaustive manual review. Richmond J. Law Technol. 17(3), 11 (2011)
Grossman, M.R., Cormack, G.V., Roegiest, A.: TREC 2016 total recall track overview. In: TREC (2016)
He, P., Gao, J., Chen, W.: DeBERTaV 3: improving DeBERTa using electra-style pre-training with gradient-disentangled embedding sharing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09543 (2021)
He, P., Liu, X., Gao, J., Chen, W.: DeBERTa: decoding-enhanced BERT with disentangled attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03654 (2020)
Kanoulas, E., Li, D., Azzopardi, L., Spijker, R.: CLEF 2017 technologically assisted reviews in empirical medicine overview. In: CLEF 2017 (2017)
Kanoulas, E., Li, D., Azzopardi, L., Spijker, R.: CLEF 2018 technologically assisted reviews in empirical medicine overview. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2125 (2018)
Kanoulas, E., Li, D., Azzopardi, L., Spijker, R.: CLEF 2019 technology assisted reviews in empirical medicine overview. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2380 (2019)
Karpukhin, V., et al.: Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04906 (2020)
Lewis, D.D.: A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers: corrigendum and additional data. ACM SIGIR Forum 29, 13–19 (1995). ACM New York, NY, USA
Lewis, D.D., Yang, Y., Russell-Rose, T., Li, F.: RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5(Apr), 361–397 (2004)
Lin, J., Nogueira, R., Yates, A.: Pretrained transformers for text ranking: BERT and beyond. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 14(4), 1–325 (2021)
Liu, Y., Lapata, M.: Text summarization with pretrained encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08345 (2019)
Lupu, M., Salampasis, M., Hanbury, A.: Domain specific search. In: Professional Search in the Modern World: COST Action IC1002 on Multilingual and Multifaceted Interactive Information Access, pp. 96–117 (2014)
Michelson, M., Reuter, K.: The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 16, 100443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865419302054
Molinari, A., Kanoulas, E.: Transferring knowledge between topics in systematic reviews. Intell. Syst. Appl. 16, 200150 (2022)
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I.: Language models are unsupervised multitask learners (2019)
Raffel, C., et al.: Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21(140), 1–67 (2020)
Roegiest, A., Cormack, G.V., Clarke, C.L., Grossman, M.R.: TREC 2015 total recall track overview. In: TREC (2015)
Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41(4), 288–297 (1990)
Singh, G., Thomas, J., Shawe-Taylor, J.: Improving active learning in systematic reviews. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09496 (2018)
Tonellotto, N.: Lecture notes on neural information retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.13443 (2022)
Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)
Yang, E., Lewis, D.D., Frieder, O.: On minimizing cost in legal document review workflows. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 1–10 (2021)
Yang, E., Lewis, D.D., Frieder, O., Grossman, D.A., Yurchak, R.: Retrieval and richness when querying by document. In: DESIRES, pp. 68–75 (2018)
Yang, E., MacAvaney, S., Lewis, D.D., Frieder, O.: Goldilocks: just-right tuning of BERT for technology-assisted review. In: Hagen, M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2022. LNCS, vol. 13185, pp. 502–517. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_34
Yasunaga, M., Leskovec, J., Liang, P.: LinkBERT: pretraining language models with document links. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15827 (2022)
Acknowledgment
Xinyu Mao is supported by a UQ Earmarked PhD Scholarship and this research is funded by the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects programme ARC DP DP210104043.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mao, X., Koopman, B., Zuccon, G. (2024). A Reproducibility Study of Goldilocks: Just-Right Tuning of BERT for TAR. In: Goharian, N., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14611. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56065-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56066-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)