Abstract
The Metaverse comprises a network of interconnected 3D virtual worlds, poised to become the primary gateway for future online experiences. These experiences hinge upon the use of avatars, participants' virtual counterparts capable of exhibiting human-like non-verbal behaviors, such as gestures, walking, dancing, and social interaction. Discerning between human and artificial avatars becomes crucial as the concept gains prominence. Advances in artificial intelligence have facilitated the creation of virtual human-like entities, underscoring the importance of distinguishing between virtual agents and human characters. This paper investigates the factors differentiating human and virtual participants within the Metaverse environment. A semi-structured interview approach was employed, with data collected from software practitioners (N = 10). Our preliminary findings indicate that response speed, adaptability to unforeseen events, and recurring scenarios play significant roles in determining whether an entity in the virtual world is a human or an intelligent agent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Raij, A.B., et al.: Comparing interpersonal interactions with a virtual human to those with a real human. IEEE Trans. Visualization Computer Graphics 13(3), 443–457 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.1030
Wang, D., Yan, X., Zhou, Y.: Research on metaverse: concept, development and standard system. In: 2021 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Information Technology (CECIT), Sanya, China, pp. 983–991 (2021)
Terrace, J., Cheslack-Postava, E., Levis, P., Freedman, M.J.: Unsupervised conversion of 3D models for interactive metaverses. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp. 902–907 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2012.186
Gonzales-Franco, M.: Keynote speaker: metaversefrom fiction to reality and the research behind it. In: 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), p. 17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00011
Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Pres. Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 21, 373–387 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124
Steed, A., Pan, Y., Zisch, F., Steptoe, W.: The impact of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive virtual reality. In: 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR), Greenville, SC, 19–23 March 2016, pp. 67–76. IEEE, Piscataway (2016)
Gonzalez-Franco, M., Steed, A., Hoogendyk, S., Ofek, E.: Using facial animation to increase the enfacement illusion and avatar self-identification. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 26, 2023–2029 (2020)
Peck, T.C., Doan, M., Bourne, K.A., Good, J.J.: The effect of gender body-swap illusions on working memory and stereotype threat. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph 24, 1604–1612 (2018)
Peck, T.C., Tutar, A.: The impact of a self-avatar, hand collocation, and hand proximity on embodiment and stroop interference. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph 26, 1964–1971 (2020)
Lush, P., Vazire, S., Holcombe, A.: Demand characteristics confound the rubber hand illusion. Collabra: Psychol. 6, 83 (2020)
Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., Anderson, L.: The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, New York; NY, United States, 27 October 2008, pp. 167–170. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2008)
Ebrahimi, E., Hartman, L.S., Robb, A., Pagano, C.C., Babu, S.V.: Investigating the effects of anthropomorphic fidelity of self-avatars on near field depth perception in immersive virtual environments. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), Reutlingen, Germany, 18 March 2018, pp. 1–8. IEEE, Piscataway (2018)
Jung, S., Bruder, G., Wisniewski, P.J., Sandor, C., Hughes, C.E.: Over my hand: using a personalized hand in VR to improve object size estimation, body ownership, and presence. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on spatial user interaction, Berlin, Germany, 13–14 October 2018, pp. 60–68. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018)
Ogawa, N., Narumi, T., Hirose, M.: Virtual hand realism affects object size perception in body-based scaling. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), Osaka, Japan, 23–27 March 2019, pp. 519–528. IEEE, Piscataway (2019))
Gonzalez-Franco, M., Abtahi, P., Steed, A.: Individual differences in embodied distance estimation in virtual reality. In: 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), Osaka, Japan, 23–27 March 2019, pp. 941–943. IEEE, Piscataway (2019)
Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.: An exploration of individual personality types in software development. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 111–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_10
Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Clarke, P.: An examination of personality traits and how they impact on software development teams. Inf. Softw. Technol. 86, 101–122 (2017)
Kim, M., Kim, K., Kim, S., Dey, A.K.: Performance evaluation gaps in a real-time strategy game between human and artificial intelligence players. IEEE Access 6, 13575–13586 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2800016
Han, Y., Oh, S.: Investigation and research on the negotiation space of mental and mental illness based on metaverse. In: 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 673–677 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC52510.2021.9621118
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Adline Publishing Company, Chicago (1967)
Liu, Y., Wu, S.: Quality culture management model of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: a grounded theory study. In: 2018 UKSim-AMSS 20th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), pp. 102–107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/UKSim.2018.00030
Deng, J., Wu, S., Liu, Y.: Investigating the TQM practice of enterprises winning China quality award: a grounded theory perspective. In: 2017 European Modelling Symposium (EMS), pp. 115–120 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2017.30
Zhang, X.: A framework of value connection route for fresh agri-product e-commerce: a grounded theory approach in the context of China. In: 2021 2nd International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information Management (BDEIM), pp. 500–508 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/BDEIM55082.2021.00109
Ståhl, D., Mårtensson, T.: Won’t somebody please think of the tests? a grounded theory approach to industry challenges in continuous practices. In: 2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 70–77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00018
Lili, Y., Xu, X., Liu, C., Sheng, B.: Using grounded theory to understand testing engineers’ soft skills of third-party software testing centers. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering, pp. 403–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2012.6269490
Pang, C., Hindle, A., Barbosa, D.: Understanding DevOps Education with grounded theory. In: 2020 IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), pp. 107–118 (2020)
Lee, L.H., et al.: All one needs to know about metaverse: a complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda (2021). arXiv preprint, arXiv:2110.05352
Zhai, X.: ChatGPT for next generation science learning. XRDS: crossroads. ACM Maga. Stud. 29(3), 42–46 (2023)
Galletta, A.: Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication, vol. 18. NYU press, New York (2013)
Hove, S.E., Anda, B.: Experiences from conducting semi-structured interviews in empirical software engineering research. In: 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 2005), p. 10. IEEE (2005)
Acknowledgement
This research is supported in part by SFI, Science Foundation Ireland (https://www.sfi.ie/) grant No SFI 13/RC/2094 P2 to–Lero - the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Berktaş, O.T., Yılmaz, M., Clarke, P. (2023). Identifying Key Factors to Distinguish Artificial and Human Avatars in the Metaverse: Insights from Software Practitioners. In: Yilmaz, M., Clarke, P., Riel, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1890. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42307-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42307-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42306-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42307-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)