Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Evaluation of Different Tagging Schemes for Named Entity Recognition in Handwritten Documents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Document Analysis and Recognition - ICDAR 2023 (ICDAR 2023)

Abstract

Performing Named Entity Recognition on Handwritten Documents results in categorizing particular fragments of the automatic transcription which may be employed in information extraction processes. Different corpora employ different tagging notations to identify Named Entities, which may affect the performance of the trained model. In this work, we analyze three different tagging notations on three databases of handwritten line-level images. During the experimentation, we train the same Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (CRNN) and n-gram character Language Model on the resulting data and observe how choosing the best tagging notation depending on the characteristics of each task leads to noticeable performance increments.

This work was supported by Grant PID2020-116813RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, by Grant ACIF/2021/436 funded by Generalitat Valenciana and by Grant PID2021-124719OB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF, EU A way of making Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The documentation for the employed Simplex implementation is available at: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/optimize.linprog-simplex.html.

References

  1. Abadie, N., Carlinet, E., Chazalon, J., Duménieu, B.: A benchmark of named entity recognition approaches in historical documents application to 19th century French directories. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems, pp. 445–460. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bluche, T.: Deep Neural Networks for Large Vocabulary Handwritten Text Recognition. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Sud-Paris XI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boroş, E., et al.: A comparison of sequential and combined approaches for named entity recognition in a corpus of handwritten medieval charters. In: 2020 17th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), pp. 79–84. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell, M., Villegas, M., Fornés, A., Lladós, J.: Joint recognition of handwritten text and named entities with a neural end-to-end model. In: 2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 399–404. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Catelli, R., Casola, V., De Pietro, G., Fujita, H., Esposito, M.: Combining contextualized word representation and sub-document level analysis through bi-LSTM+ CRF architecture for clinical de-identification. Knowl.-Based Syst. 213, 106649 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, A., Keller, A., Frinken, V., Bunke, H.: Lexicon-free handwritten word spotting using character HMMS. Pattern Recognition Letters 33(7), 934–942 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.009, special Issue on Awards from ICPR 2010

  7. Johansson, S., Leech, G., Goodluck, H.: Manual of information to accompany the lancaster-oslo-bergen corpus of British English, for use with digital computers (1978). http://korpus.uib.no/icame/manuals/LOB/INDEX.HTM

  8. Kang, L., Toledo, J.I., Riba, P., Villegas, M., Fornés, A., Rusiñol, M.: Convolve, attend and spell: an attention-based sequence-to-sequence model for handwritten word recognition. In: Brox, T., Bruhn, A., Fritz, M. (eds.) GCPR 2018. LNCS, vol. 11269, pp. 459–472. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12939-2_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lafferty, J.D., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2001, pp. 282–289. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maarand, M., Beyer, Y., Kåsen, A., Fosseide, K.T., Kermorvant, C.: A comprehensive comparison of open-source libraries for handwritten text recognition in norwegian. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems, pp. 399–413. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Marti, U.V., Bunke, H.: The i am-database: an English sentence database for offline handwriting recognition. Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recogn. 5(1), 39–46 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mocholí Calvo, C.: Development and experimentation of a deep learning system for convolutional and recurrent neural networks. Degree’s thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohit, B.: Named entity recognition. In: Zitouni, I. (ed.) Natural Language Processing of Semitic Languages. TANLP, pp. 221–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45358-8_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Monroc, C.B., Miret, B., Bonhomme, M.L., Kermorvant, C.: A comprehensive study of open-source libraries for named entity recognition on handwritten historical documents. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems, pp. 429–444. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Povey, D., et al.: The kaldi speech recognition toolkit. In: IEEE 2011 Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding. No. CFP11SRW-USB, IEEE Signal Processing Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puigcerver, J.: Are multidimensional recurrent layers really necessary for handwritten text recognition? In: 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), vol. 1, pp. 67–72. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Romero, V., et al.: The Esposalles database: an ancient marriage license corpus for off-line handwriting recognition. Pattern Recognit. 46(6), 1658–1669 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rowtula, V., Krishnan, P., Jawahar, C.: Pos tagging and named entity recognition on handwritten documents. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Natural Language Processing, p. 87–91 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sánchez, J.A., Bosch, V., Romero, V., Depuydt, K., De Does, J.: Handwritten text recognition for historical documents in the transcriptorium project. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage, pp. 111–117 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stolcke, A.: Srilm - an extensible language modeling toolkit. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002), pp. 901–904 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tarride, S., Lemaitre, A., Coéasnon, B., Tardivel, S.: A comparative study of information extraction strategies using an attention-based neural network. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems. DAS 2022. LNCS, vol. 13237, pp. 644–658. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_43

  22. Tjong Kim Sang, E.F., Buchholz, S.: Introduction to the CoNLL-2000 shared task chunking. In: Fourth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning and the Second Learning Language in Logic Workshop, pp. 127–132 (2000). https://aclanthology.org/W00-0726

  23. Tüselmann, O., Fink, G.A.: Named entity linking on handwritten document images. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems, pp. 199–213. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Tüselmann, O., Wolf, F., Fink, G.A.: Are end-to-end systems really necessary for NER on handwritten document images? In: Lladós, J., Lopresti, D., Uchida, S. (eds.) ICDAR 2021. LNCS, vol. 12822, pp. 808–822. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86331-9_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Villanova-Aparisi, D.: Line-level named entity recognition annotation for the George Washington and IAM datasets (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7805128

  26. Villanova-Aparisi, D., Martínez-Hinarejos, C.D., Romero, V., Pastor-Gadea, M.: Evaluation of named entity recognition in handwritten documents. In: Uchida, S., Barney, E., Eglin, V. (eds.) Document Analysis Systems. DAS 2022. LNCS, vol. 13237, pp. 568–582. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06555-2_38

  27. Villegas, M., Romero, V., Sánchez, J.A.: On the modification of binarization algorithms to retain grayscale information for handwritten text recognition. In: Paredes, R., Cardoso, J.S., Pardo, X.M. (eds.) IbPRIA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9117, pp. 208–215. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19390-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Wen, Y., Fan, C., Chen, G., Chen, X., Chen, M.: A survey on named entity recognition. In: Liang, Q., Wang, W., Liu, X., Na, Z., Jia, M., Zhang, B. (eds.) CSPS 2019. LNEE, vol. 571, pp. 1803–1810. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9409-6_218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Wick, C., Zöllner, J., Grüning, T.: Transformer for handwritten text recognition using bidirectional post-decoding. In: Lladós, J., Lopresti, D., Uchida, S. (eds.) ICDAR 2021. LNCS, vol. 12823, pp. 112–126. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86334-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Xingjian, S., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.Y., Wong, W.K., Woo, W.C.: Convolutional lstm network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 802–810 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yadav, V., Bethard, S.: A survey on recent advances in named entity recognition from deep learning models. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. pp. 2145–2158. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 2018. https://aclanthology.org/C18-1182

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Villanova-Aparisi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Villanova-Aparisi, D., Martínez-Hinarejos, CD., Romero, V., Pastor-Gadea, M. (2023). Evaluation of Different Tagging Schemes for Named Entity Recognition in Handwritten Documents. In: Fink, G.A., Jain, R., Kise, K., Zanibbi, R. (eds) Document Analysis and Recognition - ICDAR 2023. ICDAR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14189. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41682-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41682-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41681-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41682-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics