Project Engagement Technologies and Their Role in Shaping Conditions for Engagement and Care in Participatory Design Projects

• Andersen, L. B., Danholt, P., Halskov, K., Hansen, N. B., & Lauritsen, P. (2015). Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design. 11(3–4), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246

• Brandt, E., Mortensen, P. F., Malmborg, L., Binder, T., & Sokoloer, T. (2012). SeniorInteraktion: Innovation gennem dialog. In E. Brandt, P. F. Mortensen, L. Malmborg, T. Binder, & T. Sokoloer (Eds.), Uniwersytet śląski (Vol. 7, Issue 1). Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Skoler for Arkitektur, Design og Konservering. https://doi.org/10.2/JQUERY.MIN.JS

• Clement, A., & Van den Besselaar, P. (1993). A retrospective look at PD projects. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.163264

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Del Gaudio, C., Parra-Agudelo, L., Clarke, R., Saad-Sulonen, J., Botero, A., Londoño, F. C., & Escandón, P. (2020). Introduction: PDC2020 - participation(s) otherwise - Vol 1. PDC ‘20: Proceedings of the 16th participatory design conference 2020: Participation(s) otherwise, Vol. 1, VI–IX.

  Google Scholar 

• Disalvo, C. (2022). Design as democratic inquiry: Putting experimental civics into practice: (C. DiSalvo, Ed.). MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Eriksen, M. A. (2009). Engaging design materials, formats and framings in specific, situated co-designing – A micro-material perspective. Nordes, 0(3).

  Google Scholar 

• Ertner, M., Kragelund, A. M., & Malmborg, L. (2010). Five enunciations of empowerment in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference (p. 191).

  Google Scholar 

• Ertner, M., & Winthereik, B. R. (2022). Policy concepts and their shadows. Science & Technology Studies.

  Google Scholar 

• Ertner, S. M. (2015). Infrastructuring design : an ethnographic study of welfare technologies and design in a public-private and user driven innovation project. PhD Thesis, IT University of Copenhagen, software and systems section.

  Google Scholar 

• Fujimura, J., & Clarke, A. (1992). The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences. Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gill, N., Singleton, V., & Waterton, C. (2017). The politics of policy practices. The Sociological Review, 65(2_suppl), 3–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Gordon, E., & Mugar, G. (2020). Meaningful inefficiencies.

  Google Scholar 

• Halse, J., Brandt, E., Clark, B., & Binder, T. (2010). Rehearsing the future. In J. Halse, E. Brandt, B. Clark, & T. Binder (Eds.), The Danish Design School Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Halskov, K., & Hansen, N. B. (2015). The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 81–92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jensen, T. E. (2012). Intervention by Invitation: New concerns and new versions of the user in STS, 25(1), 13–36.

  Google Scholar 

• Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3), 167–185.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kyng, M., & Greenbaum, J. (1991). Cooperative design: Bringing together the practices of users and designers (pp. 405–416). Information Systems Research.

  Google Scholar 

• Latour, B. (2012). Why has critique run out of steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern, 30(2), 225–248.

  Google Scholar 

• Law, J. (2015). Care and killing tensions in veterinary practice. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 57–72). Transcript Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Light, A., & Akama, Y. (2014). Structuring future social relations (pp. 151–160).

  Google Scholar 

• Lindström, K., & Ståhl, Å. (2019). Caring design experiments in the aftermath. Nordes Conference Series, 1.

  Google Scholar 

• Lipp, B. (2022). Caring for robots: How care comes to matter in human-machine interfacing. Social Studies of Science.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mörtberg, C., & Studedahl, D. (2005). Silences and sensibilities: Increasing participation in IT design. In Critical computing - between sense and sensibility - proceedings of the 4th decennial Aarhus conference (pp. 141–144).

  Google Scholar 

• Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pedersen, J. (2016). War and peace in codesign. CoDesign, 12(3), 171–184.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pihkala, S., & Karasti, H. (2016). Reflexive engagement - Enacting reflexivity in design and for “participation in plural.” ACM international conference proceeding series, 1, 21–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Poderi, G., Bettega, M., Capaccioli, A., & D’Andrea, V. (2018). Disentangling participation through time and interaction spaces–the case of IT design for energy demand management. CoDesign, 14(1), 45–59.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Poderi, G., Hasselqvist, H., Capaccioli, A., Bogdan, C., & D’Andrea, V. (2020). Matters of concerns and user stories: Ontological and methodological considerations for collaborative design processes. CoDesign, 16(3), 220–232.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (Vol. 41). University of Minnesota Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rodgers, P., Innella, G., Bremner, C., & Coxon, I. (2019). The Lancaster care charter. Design Issues, 35(1), 73–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosińska, M., & Szydłowska, A. (2019). Zoepolis: Non-anthropocentric design as an experiment in multi-species care. Nordes, 0(8).

  Google Scholar 

• Saad-Sulonen, J., Eriksson, E., Halskov, K., Karasti, H., & Vines, J. (2018). Unfolding participation over time: Temporal lenses in participatory design. CoDesign, 14(1), 4–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (2013). Routledge international handbook of participatory design (hardback). Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Singleton, V., & Mee, S. (2017). Critical compassion: Affect, discretion and policy–care relations. The Sociological Review, 65(2_suppl), 130–149.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, R. C., Bossen, C., & Kanstrup, A. M. (2017). Participatory design in an era of participation. CoDesign, 13(2), 65–69.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stuedahl, D., & Finken, S. (2008). Silence’ as an analytical category for PD. In PDC (pp. 170–173).

  Google Scholar 

• Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Suchman, L., Trigg, R., & Blomberg, J. (2002). Working artefacts: Ethnomethods of the prototype. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 163–179.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Toombs, A. L., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2015). The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces: Care ethics and cultures of making. Conference on human factors in computing systems - proceedings (pp. 629–638).

  Google Scholar 

• Yndigegn, S. L. (2016). Managing resistance and negotiating co-design - Reflections on troublesome and elusive moments. IT University of Copenhagen.

  Google Scholar 

Download references