Open Voting Client Architecture and Op-Ed Voting for Secret Ballot Elections

1. Acemyan, C.Z., Kortum, P., Byrne, M.D., Wallach, D.S.: Summative usability assessments of star-vote: a cryptographically secure e2e voting system that has been empirically proven to be easy to use. Hum. Factors 64(5), 866–889 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Adida, B.: Helios documentation (2021). https://vote.heliosvoting.org/docs

3. Adida, B.: Helios github (2021). https://github.com/benadida/helios-server

4. Benaloh, J.: Electionguard specification v0.95 (2021). https://github.com/microsoft/electionguard/releases/tag/v0.95.0

5. Castelló, S.G.: Individual verifiability in electronic voting. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) (2016)

   Google Scholar 

6. Chaabane, F., Ktari, J., Frikha, T., Hamam, H.: Low power blockchained e-vote platform for university environment. Future Internet 14(9), 269 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Chaurasia, P.: Offline signature verification using high pressure regions (2009). uS Patent 7,599,528

   Google Scholar 

8. Chaurasia, P., Yogarajah, P., Condell, J., Prasad, G., McIlhatton, D., Monaghan, R.: Biometrics and counter-terrorism: the case of gait recognition. Behav. Sci. Terrorism Polit. Aggression 7(3), 210–226 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Chowdary, J., Yogarajah, P., Chaurasia, P., Guruviah, V.: A multi-task learning framework for automated segmentation and classification of breast tumors from ultrasound images. Ultrason. Imaging 44(1), 3–12 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Compliance, S.: Es &s evs 6.0.0.0 certification test report (2018). https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/voting_system/files/ESS_EVS6000_EAC_Certification_Test_Report_v4.0.pdf

11. Compliance, S.: County of los angeles vsap tally 2.1 functional test report (2020). https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/LAC/vsap2-1/vsap21-funct-reprt.pdf

12. Denis González, C., Frias Mena, D., Massó Muñoz, A., Rojas, O., Sosa-Gómez, G.: Electronic voting system using an enterprise blockchain. Appl. Sci. 12(2), 531 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Galindo, D., Guasch, S., Puiggalí, J.: 2015 Neuchâtel’s cast-as-intended verification mechanism. In: Haenni, R., Koenig, R.E., Wikström, D. (eds.) VOTELID 2015. LNCS, vol. 9269, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22270-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

14. Khodadadzadeh, M., Ding, X., Chaurasia, P., Coyle, D.: A hybrid capsule network for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sens. 14, 11824–11839 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Mahajan, H.B., et al.: Integration of healthcare 4.0 and blockchain into secure cloud-based electronic health records systems. Appl. Nanosci. 13, 1–14 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

16. Mairiza, D., Zowghi, D., Nurmuliani, N.: Managing conflicts among non-functional requirements. In: 12th Australian Workshop on Requirements Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

17. Pardue, H., Yasinsac, A., Landry, J.: Towards internet voting security: a threat tree for risk assessment. In: 2010 Fifth International Conference on Risks and Security of Internet and Systems (CRiSIS), pp. 1–7 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/CRISIS.2010.5764925

18. Reddy, A.V., Raghavan, S.V.: Architecture of multi channel multi database voting system. In: Funabashi, M., Grzech, A. (eds.) I3E 2005. IIFIP, vol. 189, pp. 281–295. Springer, Boston, MA (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29773-1_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

19. Roy, S., Morais, F.J.A., Salimitari, M., Chatterjee, M.: Cache attacks on blockchain based information centric networks: an experimental evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, pp. 134–142 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

20. Schmidt, A., Albert, L.A.: Designing pandemic-resilient voting systems. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 80, 101174 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. School, T.W.: The business of voting (2017). https://trustthevote.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2017-whartonoset_industryreport.pdf

22. Specter, M.A., Koppel, J., Weitzner, D.: The ballot is busted before the blockchain: A security analysis of voatz, the first internet voting application used in us federal elections. In: 29th \(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security Symposium (\(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security 20), pp. 1535–1553 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

23. Stefanelli, R., Monnat, D.M.X.: A secure e-voting infrastructure. implementation by swiss post. Second In, 326 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

24. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.2001.948567

25. van Lamsweerde, A., Darimont, R., Letier, E.: Managing conflicts in goal-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24(11), 908–926 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/32.730542

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. V &V, P.: Dominion voting systems democracy suite version 5.5 test report (2018). https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/voting_system/files/Dominion_Voting_Systems_D-Suite_5.5_Test_Report_Rev_A.pdf

27. Wilson, A.: Modeling conflicts in secret ballot elections. E-Vote-ID 2019, 171 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

28. Wilson, A.: Open Voting Client Architecture and Op-Ed Voting: a Novel Framework for Solving Requirement Conflicts in Secret Ballot Elections. Ph.D. thesis (2021), https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/open-voting-client-architecture-op-ed-novel/docview/2665128159/se-2, copyright - Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works; Last updated - 2022-05-24

Download references