Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Distinguishing Sensitive and Insensitive Options for the Winograd Schema Challenge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2023)

Abstract

The Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) is a popular benchmark for commonsense reasoning. Each WSC instance has a component that corresponds to the mention of the correct answer option of the two options in the context. We observe that the answers of many instances are insensitive to the options. In this paper, based on this observation, we propose an approach based on fine-tuning the pre-trained language model for WSC by distinguishing sensitive and insensitive options. First, we split WSC instances into option-sensitive and insensitive categories, and use option expanding and option masking strategies to weaken the options so that the model does not pay attention to options when they are insensitive during fine-tuning. Second, we treat the two categories as intermediate-task of each other, and use transfer learning to improve the performance. We fine-tune BERT-Large and T5-XXL with our approach on WINOGRANDE, a new dataset of WSC, and the experiment shows our method outperforms baselines by a large margin, achieving state-of-the-art, which indicates the effectiveness of our instance-distinguishing strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/allenai/mosaic-leaderboard/tree/master/winogrande/evaluator.

References

  1. Akbik, A., Bergmann, T., Blythe, D., Rasul, K., Schweter, S., Vollgraf, R.: Flair: an easy-to-use framework for state-of-the-art NLP. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Demonstrations), pp. 54–59 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, T.-Y., Chi-Jen, L.: Rethinking why intermediate-task fine-tuning works. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pp. 706–713 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

  4. Emami, A., De La Cruz, N., Trischler, A., Suleman, K., Cheung, J.C.K.: A knowledge hunting framework for common sense reasoning. In: EMNLP (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khashabi, D., et al.: UnifiedQA: crossing format boundaries with a single QA system. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 1896–1907 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levesque, H., Davis, E., Morgenstern, L.: The Winograd schema challenge. In: Thirteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, Q., Jiang, H., Ling, Z.-H., Zhu, X., Wei, S., Hu, Y.: Combing context and commonsense knowledge through neural networks for solving Winograd schema problems. In: 2017 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lourie, N., Le Bras, R., Bhagavatula, C., Choi, Y.: Unicorn on rainbow: a universal commonsense reasoning model on a new multitask benchmark. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35, pp. 13480–13488 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Opitz, J., Frank, A.: Addressing the Winograd schema challenge as a sequence ranking task. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Language Cognition and Computational Models, pp. 41–52 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peng, H., Khashabi, D., Roth, D.: Solving hard coreference problems. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 809–819 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pruksachatkun, Y., et al.: Intermediate-task transfer learning with pretrained language models: when and why does it work? In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5231–5247 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raffel, C., et al.: Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683 (2019)

  13. Roberts, A., Raffel, C., Shazeer, N.: How much knowledge can you pack into the parameters of a language model? In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 5418–5426 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakaguchi, K., Le Bras, R., Bhagavatula, C., Choi, Y.: Winogrande: an adversarial Winograd schema challenge at scale. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 8732–8740 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trinh, T.H., Le, Q.V.: A simple method for commonsense reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.02847 (2018)

  16. Zhang, H., Ding, H., Song, Y.: Sp-10k: a large-scale evaluation set for selectional preference acquisition. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 722–731 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (No. 2021ZD0110700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jintao Tang or Ting Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, D. et al. (2023). Distinguishing Sensitive and Insensitive Options for the Winograd Schema Challenge. In: Wang, X., et al. Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13945. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30675-4_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30675-4_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30674-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30675-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics