Exploring Dialog Act Recognition in Open Domain Conversational Agents

1. Popescu-Belis, A.: Abstracting a dialog act tagset for meeting processing. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Portugal. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2004). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2004/pdf/268.pdf

2. Wei, C., Yu, Z., Fong, S.: How to build a chatbot: chatbot framework and its capabilities. In: Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing, pp. 369–373 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

3. Xu, A., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Sinha, V., Akkiraju, R.: A new chatbot for customer service on social media. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3506–3510 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

4. Malhotra, G., Waheed, A., Srivastava, A., Akhtar, M.S., Chakraborty, T.: Speaker and time-aware joint contextual learning for dialogue-act classification in counselling conversations. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 735–745 (2022)

   Google Scholar 

5. Noble, J.M., et al.: Developing, implementing, and evaluating an artificial intelligence-guided mental health resource navigation chatbot for health care workers and their families during and following the covid-19 pandemic: Protocol for a cross-sectional study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 11(7), 33717 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Quinn, K., Zaiane, O.: Identifying questions & requests in conversation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International C* Conference on Computer Science & Software Engineering, pp. 1–6 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

7. Welivita, A., Pu, P.: A taxonomy of empathetic response intents in human social conversations. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 4886–4899. International Committee on Computational Linguistics (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.429. https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.429

8. Godfrey, J.J., Holliman, E.: Switchboard-1 release 2. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, vol. 926, p. 927 (1997)

   Google Scholar 

9. Dhillon, R., Bhagat, S., Carvey, H., Shriberg, E.: Meeting recorder project: dialog act labeling guide. Technical report, International Computer Science Inst Berkeley CA (2004)

   Google Scholar 

10. Colombo, P., Chapuis, E., Manica, M., Vignon, E., Varni, G., Clavel, C.: Guiding attention in sequence-to-sequence models for dialogue act prediction. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 7594–7601 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

11. Li, R., Lin, C., Collinson, M., Li, X., Chen, G.: A dual-attention hierarchical recurrent neural network for dialogue act classification. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pp. 383–392 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

12. Raheja, V., Tetreault, J.: Dialogue act classification with context-aware self-attention. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 3727–3733 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

13. Qin, L., Che, W., Li, Y., Ni, M., Liu, T.: DCR-Net: a deep co-interactive relation network for joint dialog act recognition and sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 8665–8672 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

14. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423. https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423

15. Saha, T., Gupta, D., Saha, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Emotion aided dialogue act classification for task-independent conversations in a multi-modal framework. Cogn. Comput. 1–13 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

16. Gautam, D., Maharjan, N., Graesser, A.C., Rus, V.: Automated speech act categorization of chat utterances in virtual internships. In: EDM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

17. Zhang, R., Gao, D., Li, W.: What are tweeters doing: Recognizing speech acts in twitter. In: Analyzing Microtext (2011)

    Google Scholar 

18. Yu, D., Yu, Z.: Midas: A dialog act annotation scheme for open domain humanmachine spoken conversations. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pp. 1103–1120 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

19. Clark, C., Lee, K., Chang, M.-W., Kwiatkowski, T., Collins, M., Toutanova, K.: Boolq: exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 2924–2936 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

20. Coucke, A., et al.: Snips voice platform: an embedded spoken language understanding system for private-by-design voice interfaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10190 (2018)

21. Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., Liang, P.: Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2383–2392 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

22. Byrne, B., et al.: Taskmaster-1: toward a realistic and diverse dialog dataset. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 4516–4525 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

23. Hemphill, C.T., Godfrey, J.J., Doddington, G.R.: The ATIS spoken language systems pilot corpus. In: Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Hidden Valley, Pennsylvania, 24–27 June 1990 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

24. Acharya, S., Fung, G.: Using optimal embeddings to learn new intents with few examples: an application in the insurance domain (2020)

    Google Scholar 

25. González-Carvajal, S., Garrido-Merchán, E.C.: Comparing bert against traditional machine learning text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.13012 (2020)

26. Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026683

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

27. Luo, X.: Efficient English text classification using selected machine learning techniques. Alex. Eng. J. 60(3), 3401–3409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Morales-Hernández, R.C., Becerra-Alonso, D., Vivas, E.R., Gutiérrez, J.: Comparison between SVM and distilbert for multi-label text classification of scientific papers aligned with sustainable development goals. In: Pichardo Lagunas, O., Martínez-Miranda, J., Martínez Seis, B. (eds.) MICAI 2022. LNCS, vol. 13613, pp. 57–67. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19496-2_5

29. Kambar, M.E.Z.N., Nahed, P., Cacho, J.R.F., Lee, G., Cummings, J., Taghva, K.: Clinical text classification of Alzheimer’s drugs’ mechanism of action. In: Yang, X.-S., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds.) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. LNNS, vol. 235, pp. 513–521. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2377-6_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

30. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

31. Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, Y.: DialogSum: a real-life scenario dialogue summarization dataset. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pp. 5062–5074. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online (2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.449. https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-acl.449

32. Li, Y., Su, H., Shen, X., Li, W., Cao, Z., Niu, S.: DailyDialog: a manually labelled multi-turn dialogue dataset. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 986–995. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (2017). https://aclanthology.org/I17-1099

33. Sun, K., Yu, D., Chen, J., Yu, D., Choi, Y., Cardie, C.: DREAM: a challenge data set and models for dialogue-based reading comprehension. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 7, 217–231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00264

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Cui, L., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, M.: MuTual: a dataset for multi-turn dialogue reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1406–1416. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.130. https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.130

Download references